Neurobehavioral response to multisensory stimulation programme in high-risk neonates

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 23 - Trang 22-29 - 2018
Eman K. Mohamed1, Faten Abdelazeim1, Mohamed A. Elshafey1, Nehad Nasef2,3
1Department of Physical Therapy for Paediatrics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Cairo, Giza, Egypt
2Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt
3Department of Neonatal Perinatal Medicine, HSC, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Tóm tắt

High-risk neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are suffering from lack of sensory experiences that are vital for normal brain development, rather are exposed to excessive or inappropriately timed stimulation in the NICU that leads to deleterious effects on premature infants whose brains are immaturely developed. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of multisensory stimulation programme on neurobehavioral development in high-risk neonates. A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted on 40 high-risk neonates, who were selected from NICUs, with mean gestational age of33±1.03 weeks according to new Ballard score and mean weight 1442±228.5 g. They were allocated into either the control group or the study group. The control group received routine medical and nursery care in the NICU, whereas the study group received the same programme given to the control group in addition to the multisensory stimulation programme given daily for 2 successive weeks. The outcomes were measured before and after the intervention by Morgan neonatal neurobehavioral examination and Brazelton neonatal behavioural assessment scale. There was a significant improvement in all measured variables in the study group after the intervention programme (P<0.05) except in the state regulation and autonomic system, whereas the control group showed no significant difference in all measured variables except in weight gain. Multisensory stimulation improved neurobehavioral development in high-risk neonates. This could be a vital part of the routine neonatal physiotherapy for preterm and high-risk neonates.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Segen JC. Concise dictionary of modern medicine. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.; 2002. Mosby’s medical dictionary. 8th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2009. Ramachandran S, Dutta S. Early developmental care interventions of preterm very low birth weight infants. Indian Pediatr 2013; 50: 765–770. Sweeney JK, Heriza CB, Blanchard Y. Neonatal physical therapy. Part I: clinical competencies and neonatal intensive care unit clinical training models. Pediatr Phys Ther 2009; 21:296. Spittl AJ, Orton J. Cerebral palsy and developmental coordination disorder in children born preterm. Semin Fetal Neonat Med 2014; 19:84–89. Treyvaud K, Ure A, Doyle LW, Lee KJ, Rogers CE, Kidokoro H, et al. Psychiatric outcomes at age seven for very preterm children: rates and predictors. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2013; 54:772–779. Doyle LW, Cheong JL, Burnett A, Roberts G, Lee KJ, Anderson PJ, et al. Biological and social influences on outcomes of extreme-preterm/low-birth weight adolescents. Pediatrics 2015; 136:513–520. Vogel JP, Oladapo OT, Manu A, Gulmezoglu AM, Bah IR. New WHO recommendations to improve the outcomes of preterm birth. Lancet Glob Health 2015; 3:589–590. Zohreh B, Shiva S, Pegah P. Effect of massage on weight gain in premature infants. Iranian J Neonatol 2012; 3:57–62. Symington A, Pinelli J. Developmental care for promoting development and preventing morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 4:2. Meeks M, Hallsworth M, Yeo H. Nursing the neonate. 2nd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. Dieter J, Emory E. Supplemental stimulation of premature infants: a treatment model. J Pediatr Psychol 1997; 22:281–295. Anand KJS, Berqvist L, Hall RW, Carbajal R. A cute pain management in newborn infants. Pain Clin Update 2011; 19:1–6. Bellieni CV, Buonocore G, Nenci A, Franci N, Cordelli DM, Bagnoli F. Sensorial saturation: an effective analgesic tool for heel-prick in preterm infants: a prospective randomized trial. Biol Neonate 2001; 80:15–18. Jang GJ, Lee SL, Kim HM. Breast feeding rates and factors influencing breast feeding practice in late preterm infants: comparison with preterm born at less than 34 weeks of gestational age. J Korean Acad Nurs 2012; 42:181–189. Sweeney JK, Heriza CB, Blanchard Y, Dusing SC. Neonatal physical therapy. Part II: practice frameworks and evidence-based practice guidelines. Pediatr Phys Ther 2010; 22:2–16. Jeng SF, Tsao CC, Chenb LC, Teng GR, Yau TK, Jan M. Reliability of the neonatal neurobehavioral examination Chinese version. Early Hum Dev 1996; 45:191–192. Morgan AM, Koch V, Lee V, Aldag J. Neonatal neurobehavioral examination: a new instrument for quantitative analysis of neonatal neurological status. Phys Ther 1988; 68:1352–1358. Brazelton TB, Nugent JK. Neonatal behavioral assessment scale. In: Brazelton TB, Nugent JK. editors. Clinics in developmental medicine. 3rd ed. London: Mac Keith Press 1995. pp. 137–166. Costa R, Figueiredo B, Tendais I, Conde A, Pacheco A, Teixeira C. Brazelton Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale: a psychometric study in a Portuguese sample. Infant Behav Dev 2010; 33:510–517. Procianoy RS, Renato S, Mendes EW, Silveira RC. Massage therapy improves neurodevelopment outcome at two years corrected age for very low birth weight infants. Early Hum Dev 2009; 86:7–11. Fucile S, Gisel EG. Sensorimotor interventions improve growth and motor function in preterm infants. Neonatal Netw 2010; 29:359–366. Samara M, Johnson S, Lamberts K, Marlow N, Wolke D. Eating problems at age 6 years in a whole population sample of extremely preterm children. Dev Med Child Neurol 2010; 52:16–22. Blauw-Hospers CH, Hadders-Algra M. A systematic review of the effects of early intervention on motor development. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005; 47:421–432. Gabis LV, Hacham-Pilosof K, Yosef OB, Rabinovitz G, Leshem G, Shilon-Hadass A, et al. The influence of a multisensory intervention for preterm infants provided by parents, on developmental abilities and on parental stress levels. J Child Neurol 2015; 30:896–903. Keller A, Arbel N, Merlob P, Davidson S. Neurobehavioral and autonomic effects of hammock positioning in infants with very low birth weight. Pediatr Phys Ther 2003; 15:3. Pedersen S, Sommerfelt K, Markestad T. Early motor development of premature infants with birthweight less than 2000 grams. Acta Paediatr 2000; 89:1456–1461. Smith GC, Gutovich J, Smyser C, Pineda R, Newnham C, Tjoeng TH, et al. Neonatal intensive care unit stress is associated with brain development in preterm infants. Ann Neurol 2011; 70:541–549. Als H. Developmental care in the newborn intensive care unit. Curr Opin Pediatr 1998; 10:138. Aliabadi F, Askary R. Effects of tactile-kinaesthetic stimulation on low birth weight neonates. Iran J Pediatr 2013; 23:289–294. John NI, Dieter, Emory EK. Supplemental stimulation of premature infants: a treatment model. J Pediatr Psychol 1997; 22:281–295. Hodges AL, Wilson LL. Preterm infants’ responses to music: an integrative literature review. Southern Online J Nurs Res 2010; 10:1–6. Taneja V, Sriram S, Beri RS, Sreenivas V, Aggarwal R, Kaur R. Not by bread alone Impact of a structured 90 min play session on development of children in an orphanage. Child Care Health Dev 2002; 28: 95–100. Fiaenza C, Capone C, Galgano MC. The emergence of the sleep-wake cycle in infancy. Ital J Neurol Sci 1986; 5:37–42. Ferreira AM, Bergamasco NH. Behavioral analysis of preterm neonates included in a tactile and kinesthetic stimulation program during hospitalization. Rev Bras Fisioter 2010; 14:141–148. Diego M, Field T, Hernandez-Reif M. Preterm infant massage elicits consistent increase in vagal activity and gastric motility that are associated with greater weight gain. Acta Paediatr 2007; 96: 1588–1591. Rocha AD, Moreira ME, Pimenta HP, Ramos JRM, Lucena SL. A randomized study of the efficacy of sensorymotor-oral stimulation and non-nutritive sucking in very low birthweight infant. Early Hum Dev 2007; 83:385.