Multiple versus Single Banking Relationships: Theory and Evidence

Journal of Finance - Tập 55 Số 3 - Trang 1133-1161 - 2000
Enrica Detragiache1, Paolo G. Garella2, Luigi Guiso3
1International Monetary Fund
2università di Bologna
3Universita' di Sassari and Ente Luigi Einaudi

Tóm tắt

A theory of the optimal number of banking relationships is developed and tested using matched bank‐firm data. According to the theory, relationship banks may be unable to continue funding profitable projects owing to internal problems and a firm may thus have to refinance from nonrelationship banks. The latter, however, face an adverse selection problem, as they do not know the quality of the project, and may refuse to lend. In these circumstances, multiple banking can reduce the probability of an early liquidation of the project. The empirical evidence supports the predictions of the model.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Asarnow Elliot, 1995, Measuring loss on defaulted bank loans: A 24‐year study, Journal of Commercial Lending, 77, 11

10.1086/296668

10.2307/2118356

10.1086/262015

Buchinsky Moshe, 1995, Evaluating the probability of failure of a banking firm, Cowles Foundation Discussion paper no. 1108

10.1006/jfin.1994.1009

10.1086/261775

10.2307/2937924

Generale Andrea, 1996, Loan recovery: cost, duration, and bank behavior, Temi di Discussione no. 265, Banca d'ltalia

10.1162/003355399555981

10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03753.x

10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05229.x

10.1016/0304-405X(89)90098-6

Ongena Steven, 1998, What determines the number of bank relationships? Cross‐country evidence, Unpublished manuscript

10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb04418.x

10.2307/2118445

10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04662.x

10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb02427.x

Shleifer Andrei, 1992, Liquidation values and debt capacity: A market equilibrium approach, Journal of Finance, 43, 1343, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04661.x

Von Thadden Ernst‐Ludwig, 1994, The commitment of finance, duplicated monitoring, and the investment horizon, Unpublished manuscript

10.1006/jfin.1995.1001