Multicentre study of abdominal aortic aneurysm measurement and enlargement

British Journal of Surgery - Tập 102 Số 12 - Trang 1480-1487 - 2015
Frank A. Lederle1, Siamak Noorbaloochi1, Sean Nugent1, Brent C Taylor1, J. Grill1, Ted R. Kohler2, L R Cole3
1Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
2VA Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
3VA Medical Center, West Los Angeles, California, USA

Tóm tắt

Abstract Background

No effective treatment is currently available to prevent progression of small and medium-sized abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Identification of drugs with sufficient promise to justify large expensive randomized trials remains challenging. One potentially useful strategy is to look for associations between commonly used drugs and AAA enlargement in appropriately adjusted observational studies.

Methods

Potential AAA measurements were identified from abdominal imaging reports in the electronic data files of three medical centres from 1995 to 2010. AAA measurements were extracted manually and patients with an aneurysm of 3 cm or larger, who had at least two measurements over an interval of at least 6 months, were identified. Other data were obtained from the electronic data files (demographics, co-morbidities, smoking status, drug use) to conduct a propensity analysis of the associations of drugs and other factors with AAA enlargement.

Results

From 52 962 abdominal imaging studies, 5362 patients with an AAA of 3 cm or more were identified, of whom 2428 had at least two measurements over at least 6 months. Mean AAA follow-up was 3·4 years and the mean AAA enlargement rate was 2·0 mm per year. Propensity analysis demonstrated no significant association of AAA enlargement with statins, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers. Diabetes was associated with a reduction in AAA enlargement of 1·2 mm per year (P = 0·008), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was associated with increased enlargement (0·5 mm per year; P = 0·050). Moderate AAA measurement variation and substantial terminal digit preference were also observed, but the digit preference became less pronounced after 2000.

Conclusion

This study confirms the negative association of diabetes with AAA progression. There was no evidence that commonly used cardiovascular drugs affect AAA enlargement.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Takagi, 2013, The Last Judgment upon abdominal aortic aneurysm screening, Int J Cardiol, 167, 2331, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.11.011

Preventive, 2005, Services Task Force. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: recommendation statement, Ann Intern Med, 142, 198, 10.7326/0003-4819-142-3-200502010-00011

Filardo, 2012, Surgery for small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD001835, 10.1002/14651858.CD001835.pub3

Lederle, 2013, Abdominal aortic aneurysm: still no pill, Ann Intern Med, 159, 852, 10.7326/0003-4819-159-12-201312170-00012

Golledge, 2011, Current status of medical management for abdominal aortic aneurysm, Atherosclerosis, 217, 57, 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.03.006

Burnham, 2002, Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information–Theoretic Approach, 2nd

Ho, 2011, MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference, J Stat Software, 42, 1, 10.18637/jss.v042.i08

Imai, 2008, Toward a common framework for statistical analysis and development, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 17, 892, 10.1198/106186008X384898

van Walraven, 1999, Surveying physicians to determine the minimal important difference: implications for sample-size calculation, J Clin Epidemiol, 52, 717, 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00050-5

Lederle, 2002, Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms, N Engl J Med, 346, 1437, 10.1056/NEJMoa012573

Sweeting, 2012, Meta-analysis of individual patient data to examine factors affecting growth and rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms, Br J Surg, 99, 655, 10.1002/bjs.8707

Bhak, 2015, Factors associated with small abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion rate, JAMA Surg, 150, 44, 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2025

Lindholt, 1999, Impaired results of a randomised double blinded clinical trial of propranolol versus placebo on the expansion rate of small abdominal aortic aneurysms, Int Angiol, 18, 52

Propranolol Aneurysm Trial Investigators, 2002, Propranolol for small abdominal aortic aneurysms: results of a randomized trial, J Vasc Surg, 35, 72, 10.1067/mva.2002.121308

Wilmink, 2000, Effect of propranolol on the expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a randomized study, Br J Surg, 87, 499, 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01420-23.x

Lederle, 2012, The strange relationship between diabetes and abdominal aortic aneurysm, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 43, 254, 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.12.026

Lederle, 1995, Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group, J Vasc Surg, 21, 945, 10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70222-9

Wannemacher, 2002, Antihypertensive medication compliance in a Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Ann Pharmacother, 36, 986, 10.1345/aph.1A324

Piette, 2004, Problems due to medication costs among VA and non-VA patients with chronic illnesses, Am J Manag Care, 10, 861

Steiner, 1988, A general method of compliance assessment using centralized pharmacy records. Description and validation, Med Care, 26, 814, 10.1097/00005650-198808000-00007

Steiner, 1997, The assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records: methods, validity, and applications, J Clin Epidemiol, 50, 105, 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00268-5