Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory

Journal of Intellectual Disability Research - Tập 49 Số 10 - Trang 699-706 - 2005
Robert A. Cummins1
1School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Tóm tắt

AbstractBackground  The Special Interest Quality of Life Group has updated its set of statements defining the quality of life (QOL) construct to reflect emerging areas of agreement and the framework for understanding better the QOL construct.Method  This article examines the major areas currently under discussion involving the objective–subjective dichotomy, needs, and core domains.Results  It is concluded that while the new statements constitute a significant advance, further progress requires testable theory. In order to facilitate such future research, a conceptual model is proposed that distinguishes causal and indicator variables within the framework of a homeostatic management system.Conclusion  Several lines of empirical investigation are suggested to test this and similar theoretical models with a view to taking our conceptualization of QOL to the next level.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1080/00049530008255370

10.1080/13668259900034061

Brown R. I., 1994, Quality of Life, 39

Cook V., 2003, Subjective Wellbeing: An Integration of Depression, Stress, and Homeostasis Theory.

10.1007/BF01079026

10.1023/A:1007027822521

10.1023/A:1024712527648

Cummins R. A., 2005, Normative Data for the Personal Wellbeing Index – Australia.

Cummins R. A., 2004, Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: Cumulative Psychometric Record.

10.1023/A:1024704320683

10.1007/978-94-010-0271-4_3

Cummins R. A., 2005, Supportive Care of the Urology patient

10.1586/14737167.4.4.413

10.1023/A:1015678915305

DavernM. T.(2005)Subjective wellbeing as an affective construct.Doctoral Thesis Deakin University Melbourne.

Fayers P. M., 1998, Clinical impact versus factor analysis for quality of life questionnaire construction, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 3

10.1111/j.1365-2788.1997.tb00689.x

10.1111/j.1468-3148.1996.tb00101.x

10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.597

10.1007/BF03359554

10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.731

HeepsL. J.(2000)The role of primary and secondary control in positive psychological adjustment.Unpublished Doctoral Thesis.Deakin University Melbourne Australia.

International Wellbeing Group, 2005, Normative Data – International

Kahneman D., 1999, Well‐being: The foundations of hedonic psychology

Lachman M. E., 1994, Aging and Quality of Life, 216

10.1023/A:1025592219390

Parmenter T. R., 1991, Quality of life: intellectual disabilities and community living, Education Journal of Australia, 3, 12

10.1080/0156655960430103

Rodin J., 1986, Aging and health: effects of the sense of control, Science, 233, 1271, 10.1126/science.3749877

10.1007/BF01078963

10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.5

Rotter J. B., 1966, Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement, Psychological Monographs, 80.

10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145

Schalock R. L., 1996, Quality of Life, Volume I: Conceptualization and Measurement, 123

10.1352/0047-6765(2002)040<0457:CMAAOQ>2.0.CO;2

Schalock R. L., 2002, Handbook on Quality of Life for Human Service Practitioners.

Wolfensberger W., 1972, The Principle of Normalization in Human Services.