Mothers roles in traditional and modern korean families: The consequences for parental practices and adolescent socialization
Tóm tắt
This paper examines Korean mothers’ roles in the socialization of their adolescent children. First, the issue is analyzed through a historical approach that takes into account the Confucian background of Korean family life. Secondly, we consider concepts and results from recent studies on mothers’ attitudes, parenting styles, and adolescent socialization. Some of the arguments and data are particularly relevant to middle class mothers. We point out that the Confucian influence remains strong in modern South Korea while at the same time mothers responsibilities in parenting and socialization have increased. As a consequence, the relationship between mothers and their adolescent children has become more complex, intense, and unstable. We conclude that the balancing of autonomy and relatedness is the most important developmental task facing mothers and their children.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Baumrind, D. (1991). Effective parenting during the early adolescent transition. In P.A. Cowan, & E.M. Hetherington (Eds.),Family transitions (pp. 111–163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cho, H. J. (1998). Korean women and their experiences in the traditional world. In H.S. Ro (Ed.),Korean women and culture (pp. 25–52). Seoul: Research Institute of Asian Women.
Hannerz, U. (1992).Cultural complexity. Studies in the social organization of meaning. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1998). Moving cultures: The perilous problems of cultural dichotomies in a globalizing society.American Psychologist, 53, 1111–1120
Inglehart, R. (1997).Modernization and postmodernization. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Kagitcibasi, C. (2000).Cultural mediation of autonomy-relatedness dynamics in adolescence. Keynote address to the 7th Congress of the European Association for Research in Adolescence, May 31–June 4, Jena, Germany.
Kim, H. B. (1992).An ethnographic study on parents involvements in schooling of their children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Kim, M. H. (1992). Late industrialization and womens work in urban South Korea: An ethnographic study of upper-middle-class families.City & Society, 6(2), 156–173.
Kim, M. H. (1995). Gender, class, and family in late-industrializing South Korea.Asian Journal of Womens Studies, 1, 58–86.
Kim, H. O. (1997). Womens quality of life.Womens Studies, 5, 95–132.
Kim, H. O., & Lee. S. A. (1997). A survey research on the womens life satisfaction.Womens Studies, 5, 207–262.
Kim, U., Triandis, H.C., Kagitcibasi, C., Choi, S.-C., & Yoon, G. (Eds.). (1994).Individualism and collectivism: theory, method, and applications. London: Sage.
Korean National Statistical Office (1999a).Number of household. http:// www.nso.go.kr/cgi-bin.
Korean National Statistical Office (1999b).Summary of economically active population/by sex. http:// www.nso.go.kr/cgi-bin.
Korean National Statistical Office (1999c).Opinions toward obstruction of female employment/by sex, age and educational attainment. http:// www.nso.go.kr/cgi-bin.
Lee, K. K. (1997).Korean family and kinship. Seoul: Jipmoondang.
Maeng, Y. J. (1996).Ethische Grundpositionen als Handlungsrechtfertigung interpersonaler Handlungen: Ein Kulturvergleich zwischen Korea (ROK) und Deutschland. [Ethical positions as justifications for interpersonal actions: A cross-cultural comparison between the Republic of Korea and Germany.] Muenster (Germany): Waxmann.
Piaget, J. (1965).The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.
Rohner, R. P., & Pettengill, S. M. (1985). Perceived parental acceptance-rejection and parental control among Korean adolescents.Child Development, 56, 524–528.
Ryan, R. M., & Lynch, J. H. (1994). Emotional autonomy versus detachment: Revisiting the vicissitudes of adolescence and young adulthood.Child Development, 60, 340–256.
Selman, R. L. (1980).The growth of interpersonal understanding: Developmental and clinical analyses. New York: Academic Press.
Smith, G., & Schwartz, S. (1996). Values. In W. Berry, M.H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.),Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Vol. 3: Social behavior and applications (pp. 78–118). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Yu, A. B., & Yang, K. S. (1994). The nature of achievement motivation in collectivist societies. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon, (Eds.),Individualism and collectivism: theory, method, and applications (pp. 239–250). London: Sage.