More than 1000 genotypes are required to derive robust relationships between yield, yield stability and physiological parameters: a computational study on wheat crop

Theoretical and Applied Genetics - Tập 136 - Trang 1-15 - 2023
Tien-Cheng Wang1,2, Pierre Casadebaig3, Tsu-Wei Chen1
1Section of Intensive Plant Food Systems, Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
2Institut für Gartenbauliche Produktionssysteme, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany
3INRAE, UMR AGIR, Université de Toulouse, Castanet-Tolosan, France

Tóm tắt

Using in silico experiment in crop model, we identified different physiological regulations of yield and yield stability, as well as quantify the genotype and environment numbers required for analysing yield stability convincingly. Identifying target traits for breeding stable and high-yielded cultivars simultaneously is difficult due to limited knowledge of physiological mechanisms behind yield stability. Besides, there is no consensus about the adequacy of a stability index (SI) and the minimal number of environments and genotypes required for evaluating yield stability. We studied this question using the crop model APSIM-Wheat to simulate 9100 virtual genotypes grown under 9000 environments. By analysing the simulated data, we showed that the shape of phenotype distributions affected the correlation between SI and mean yield and the genotypic superiority measure (Pi) was least affected among 11 SI. Pi was used as index to demonstrate that more than 150 environments were required to estimate yield stability of a genotype convincingly and more than 1000 genotypes were necessary to evaluate the contribution of a physiological parameter to yield stability. Network analyses suggested that a physiological parameter contributed preferentially to yield or Pi. For example, soil water absorption efficiency and potential grain filling rate explained better the variations in yield than in Pi; while light extinction coefficient and radiation use efficiency were more correlated with Pi than with yield. The high number of genotypes and environments required for studying Pi highlight the necessity and potential of in silico experiments to better understand the mechanisms behind yield stability.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ajay BC, Aravind J, Abdul R (2018) Ammistability: additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model stability parameters. https://cran.r-project.org/package=ammistability Asseng S, Martre P, Maiorano A et al (2019) Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein. Glob Change Biol 25(1):155–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14481 Barillot R, Escobar-Gutiérrez AJ, Fournier C et al (2014) Assessing the effects of architectural variations on light partitioning within virtual wheat-pea mixtures. Ann Bot 114(4):725–737. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcu099 Barraclough PB, Lopez-Bellido R, Hawkesford MJ (2014) Genotypic variation in the uptake, partitioning and remobilisation of nitrogen during grain-filling in wheat. Field Crop Res 156:242–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.10.004 Becker HC, Léon J (1988) Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed 101(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x Bocci R, Bussi B, Petitti M et al (2020) Yield, yield stability and farmers’ preferences of evolutionary populations of bread wheat: a dynamic solution to climate change. Eur J Agron 121:126–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2020.126156 Bolaños J, Edmeades GO (1993) Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. I. Responses in grain yield, biomass, and radiation utilization. Field Crops Res 31(3–4):233–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(93)90064-T Branco LC (2015) Phenability: nonparametric stability analysis. https://cran.r-project.org/package=phenability Breseghello F, Morais OP, Castro EM et al. (2009) Recurrent selection resulted in rapid genetic gain for upland rice in Brazil. International Rice Research Notes 34. https://doi.org/10.3860/irrn.v34i0.1069 Casadebaig P, Zheng B, Chapman S et al (2016) Assessment of the potential impacts of wheat plant traits across environments by combining crop modeling and global sensitivity analysis. PLOS ONE 11(1):e0146385. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146385 Chen T-W, Nguyen TMN, Kahlen K, Stützel H (2015) High temperature and vapor pressure deficit aggravate architectural effects but ameliorate non-architectural effects of salinity on dry mass production of tomato. Front Plant Sci 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00887 Chenu K, Cooper M, Hammer GL et al (2011) Environment characterization as an aid to wheat improvement: interpreting genotype–environment interactions by modelling water-deficit patterns in North-Eastern Australia. J Exp Bot 62(6):1743–1755. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq459 Cooper M, Powell O, Voss-Fels KP et al (2021) Modelling selection response in plant-breeding programs using crop models as mechanistic gene-to-phenotype (CGM-G2P) multi-trait link functions. in silico Plants. https://doi.org/10.1093/insilicoplants/diaa016 Cormier F, Faure S, Dubreuil P et al (2013) A multi-environmental study of recent breeding progress on nitrogen use efficiency in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 126(12):3035–3048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-013-2191-9 Damisch W, Wiberg A (1991) Biomass yield — a topical issue in modern wheat breeding programmes. Plant Breed 107(1):11–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1991.tb00523.x Dwivedi SL, Ceccarelli S, Blair MW et al (2016) Landrace germplasm for improving yield and abiotic stress adaptation. Trends Plant Sci 21(1):31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.10.012 Ehdaie B, Alloush GA, Madore MA, Waines JG (2006) Genotypic variation for stem reserves and mobilization in wheat: I. Postanthesis changes in internode dry matter. Crop Sci 46(2):735–746. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.04-0033 Eskridge KM (1990) Selection of stable cultivars using a safety-first rule. Crop Sci 30(2):369. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000020025x Fasahat P (2015) An overview on the use of stability parameters in plant breeding. BBIJ. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2015.02.00043 Ferrante A, Cartelle J, Savin R, Slafer GA (2017) Yield determination, interplay between major components and yield stability in a traditional and a contemporary wheat across a wide range of environments. Field Crop Res 203:114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.028 Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aust J Agric Res 14(6):742–754. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9630742 Hammer G, Messina C, Wu A, Cooper M (2019) Biological reality and parsimony in crop models—why we need both in crop improvement! in silico Plants. https://doi.org/10.1093/insilicoplants/diz010 Hanson WD (1970) Genotypic stability. Theor Appl Genet 40(5):226–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00285245 Juliana P, Singh RP, Braun H-J et al (2020) Genomic selection for grain yield in the CIMMYT wheat breeding program—status and perspectives. Front Plant Sci 11:1418. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.564183 Kouadio L, Newlands N, Potgieter A et al (2015) Exploring the potential impacts of climate variability on spring wheat yield with the APSIM decision support tool. Agric Sci 06(07):686–698. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2015.67066 Laplace P-S (1812) Théorie analytique des probabilités. Courcier Leakey ADB, Ferguson JN, Pignon CP et al (2019) Water use efficiency as a constraint and target for improving the resilience and productivity of C3 and C4 crops. Annu Rev Plant Biol 70:781–808. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040305 Lichthardt C, Chen T-W, Stahl A, Stützel H (2020) Co-evolution of sink and source in the recent breeding history of winter wheat in Germany. Front Plant Sci 10:1771. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01771 Lin CS, Binns MR (1988) A superiority measure of cultivar performance for cultivar × location data. Can J Plant Sci 68(1):193–198. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps88-018 Lin CS, Binns MR, Lefkovitch LP (1986) Stability analysis: where do we stand? Crop Sci 26(5):894–900. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600050012x Lollato RP, Edwards JT (2015) Maximum attainable wheat yield and resource-use efficiency in the southern great plains. Crop Sci 55(6):2863–2876. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.04.0215 Longin CFH, Reif JC (2014) Redesigning the exploitation of wheat genetic resources. Trends Plant Sci 19(10):631–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.06.012 Macholdt J, Honermeier B (2017) Yield stability in winter wheat production: a survey on German farmers’ and advisors’ views. Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy7030045 Mathews KL, Chapman SC, Trethowan R et al (2007) Global adaptation patterns of Australian and CIMMYT spring bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet 115(6):819–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-007-0611-4 Mohammadi R, Amri A (2008) Comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for selecting stable and adapted durum wheat genotypes in variable environments. Euphytica 159(3):419–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9600-6 Nassar R, Hühn M (1987) Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: tests of significance for nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics 43(1):45–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531947 Oury FX, Bérard P, Brancourt-Hulmel M et al (2003) Yield and grain protein concentration in bread wheat: a review and a study of multi-annual data from a French breeding program. J Genet Breed 57:59–68 Ovenden B, Milgate A, Lisle C et al (2017) Selection for water-soluble carbohydrate accumulation and investigation of genetic × environment interactions in an elite wheat breeding population. Theor Appl Genet 130(11):2445–2461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-017-2969-2 Parent B, Leclere M, Lacube S et al (2018) Maize yields over Europe may increase in spite of climate change, with an appropriate use of the genetic variability of flowering time. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115(42):10642–10647. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720716115 Pedro A, Savin R, Habash DZ, Slafer GA (2011) Physiological attributes associated with yield and stability in selected lines of a durum wheat population. Euphytica 180(2):195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0352-y Perez RPA, Dauzat J, Pallas B et al (2018) Designing oil palm architectural ideotypes for optimal light interception and carbon assimilation through a sensitivity analysis of leaf traits. Ann Bot 121(5):909–926. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcx161 Pfeiffer WH, Sayre KD, Reynolds MP, Payne TS (2001) Increasing yield potential and yield stability in durum wheat. In: Bedö Z, Láng L (eds) Wheat in a global environment. Proceedings of the 6th international wheat conference, 5–9 June 2000, Budapest, Hungary. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 569–577 Piepho H-P (1998) Methods for comparing the yield stability of cropping systems. J Agron Crop Sci 180(4):193–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.1998.tb00526.x Piepho H-P, Lotito S (1992) Rank correlation among parametric and nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Euphytica 64:221–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046052 Pinthus MJ (1973) Estimate of genotypic value: a proposed method. Euphytica 22(1):121–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021563 Pour-Aboughadareh A, Yousefian M, Moradkhani H et al (2019) STABILITYSOFT: a new online program to calculate parametric and non-parametric stability statistics for crop traits. Appl Plant Sci 7(1):e01211–e01211. https://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.1211 Powell JP, Rutten M (2013) Convergence of European wheat yields. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 28:53–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.048 Powell N, Ji X, Ravash R et al (2012) Yield stability for cereals in a changing climate. Funct Plant Biol 39(7):539–552. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP12078 Purchase JL, Hatting H, van Deventer CS (2000) Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa: II. Stability analysis of yield performance. S Afr J Plant Soil 17(3):101–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2000.10634878 Quilot-Turion B, Ould-Sidi M-M, Kadrani A et al (2012) Optimization of parameters of the ‘Virtual Fruit’ model to design peach genotype for sustainable production systems. Eur J Agron 42:34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2011.11.008 R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org/ Rebetzke GJ, Chenu K, Biddulph B et al (2012) A multisite managed environment facility for targeted trait and germplasm phenotyping. Funct Plant Biol 40(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP12180 Reckling M, Ahrends H, Chen T-W et al (2021) Methods of yield stability analysis in long-term field experiments. A Rev Agron Sustain Dev 41(2):27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00681-4 Reckling M, Döring TF, Bergkvist G et al (2018) Grain legume yields are as stable as other spring crops in long-term experiments across northern Europe. Agron Sustain Dev 38(6):63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0541-3 Rembe M, Zhao Y, Jiang Y, Reif JC (2019) Reciprocal recurrent genomic selection: an attractive tool to leverage hybrid wheat breeding. Theor Appl Genet 132(3):687–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-018-3244-x Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Watt M et al (2010) Breeding for improved water productivity in temperate cereals: phenotyping, quantitative trait loci, markers and the selection environment. Funct Plant Biol 37(2):85–97. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09219 Römer T (1917) Sind die ertragdreichen Sorten ertagissicherer? Mitteilungen Der Deutschen Landwirtschaftlichen Gesellschaft 32(1):87–89 Rose T, Kage H (2019) The contribution of functional traits to the breeding progress of Central-European winter wheat under differing crop management intensities. Front Plant Sci 10:1521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01521 Schulthess AW, Reif JC, Ling J et al (2017) The roles of pleiotropy and close linkage as revealed by association mapping of yield and correlated traits of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Exp Bot 68(15):4089–4101. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx214 Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch CE (2010) Variance components. Wiley, New York Sehgal D, Autrique E, Singh R et al (2017) Identification of genomic regions for grain yield and yield stability and their epistatic interactions. Sci Rep 7(1):41578. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41578 Senapati N, Semenov MA (2019) Assessing yield gap in high productive countries by designing wheat ideotypes. Sci Rep 9(1):5516. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40981-0 Senapati N, Semenov MA (2020) Large genetic yield potential and genetic yield gap estimated for wheat in Europe. Glob Food Secur 24:100340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100340 Shukla GK (1972) Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype environmental components of variability. Heredity 29(2):237–245 Sinclair TR, Jamieson PD (2008) Yield and grain number of wheat: A correlation or causal relationship?: Authors’ response to “The importance of grain or kernel number in wheat: A reply to Sinclair and Jamieson” by R.A. Fischer. Field Crops Res 105(1):22–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.07.003 Slafer GA, Savin R, Sadras VO (2014) Coarse and fine regulation of wheat yield components in response to genotype and environment. Field Crop Res 157:71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.004 Slafer GA, García GA, Serrago RA, Miralles DJ (2022) Physiological drivers of responses of grains per m2 to environmental and genetic factors in wheat. Field Crops Res 285:108593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108593 Slewinski TL (2012) Non-structural carbohydrate partitioning in grass stems: a target to increase yield stability, stress tolerance, and biofuel production. J Exp Bot 63(13):4647–4670. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers124 Stockman YM, Fischer RA, Brittain EG (1983) Assimilate supply and floret development within the spike of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Funct Plant Biol 10(6):585–594. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9830585 Sun H, Zhang X, Wang E et al (2016) Assessing the contribution of weather and management to the annual yield variation of summer maize using APSIM in the North China Plain. Field Crop Res 194:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.05.007 Thorup-Kristensen K, Halberg N, Nicolaisen M et al (2020) Digging deeper for agricultural resources, the value of deep rooting. Trends Plant Sci 25(4):406–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.12.007 Tian Z, Jing Q, Dai T et al (2011) Effects of genetic improvements on grain yield and agronomic traits of winter wheat in the Yangtze River Basin of China. Field Crop Res 124(3):417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.07.012 Tollenaar M, Lee EA (2002) Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize. Field Crop Res 75(2):161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00024-2 van Frank G, Rivière P, Pin S et al (2020) Genetic diversity and stability of performance of wheat population varieties developed by participatory breeding. Sustainability 12(1):384. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010384 Vishwakarma MK, Mishra VK, Gupta PK et al (2014) Introgression of the high grain protein gene Gpc-B1 in an elite wheat variety of Indo-Gangetic Plains through marker assisted backcross breeding. Curr Plant Biol 1:60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2014.09.003 Voss-Fels KP, Stahl A, Wittkop B et al (2019) Breeding improves wheat productivity under contrasting agrochemical input levels. Nat Plants 5(7):706–714. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0445-5 Wang T-C, Chen T-W (2022) toolStability. Tool for Stability Indices Calculation. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/toolStability/index.html Wang Y, Mette MF, Miedaner T et al (2015) First insights into the genotype–phenotype map of phenotypic stability in rye. J Exp Bot 66(11):3275–3284. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv145 Welcker C, Spencer NA, Turc O et al (2022) Physiological adaptive traits are a potential allele reservoir for maize genetic progress under challenging conditions. Nat Commun 13(1):3225. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30872-w Wricke G (1962) Über eine Methode zur Erfassung der ökologischen Streubreite in Feldverzuchen. Z Für Pflanzenzücht 47:92–96 Wu A, Hammer GL, Doherty A et al (2019) Quantifying impacts of enhancing photosynthesis on crop yield. Nat Plants 5(4):380–388. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0398-8 Wu L, Yuan S, Huang L et al (2016) Physiological mechanisms underlying the high-grain yield and high-nitrogen use efficiency of elite rice varieties under a low rate of nitrogen application in China. Front Plant Sci 7:1024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01024 Xiao YG, Qian ZG, Wu K et al (2012) Genetic gains in grain yield and physiological traits of winter wheat in Shandong Province, China, from 1969 to 2006. Crop Sci 52(1):44–56. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2011.05.0246 Yaseen M, Eskridge KM, Murtaza G (2018) Stability: stability analysis of genotype by environment interaction (GEI). https://cran.r-project.org/package=stability Zhu X-G, Long SP, Ort DR (2010) Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61(1):235–261. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112206