Moodle: Ten Years On
Tóm tắt
As Moodle (and similar online teaching tools) move into their second decade, it is important to learn how they have caught on among teachers and students. This research attempts to answer the question: Do students and teachers use Moodle to the maximum? A two-part questionnaire was designed to probe student and teacher use of Moodle. Results show that neither students nor teachers take full advantage of what Moodle has to offer.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
S. Jones and S. Fox, “Generations Online in 2009,” Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington DC, 2009.
A. Al-Ajlan and H. Zedan, “Why Moodle,” in Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems, 2008, FTDCS’08, 12th IEEE International Workshop on, pp. 58-64, IEEE, 2008.
(2015). Internet Users (per 100 people) in Israel. [Online] Available: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/israel/internet-users-per-100-people-wb-data.html
(2013). Israel No. 2 in World for Internet Usage. [Online] Available: http://www.israel21c.org/news/israel-no-2-in-world-for-internet-usage/
D. Shamah (2012). Study:Young Online Israelis ‘Hyper-connected,’ Adults Not Far Behind. [Online] Available: http://www.timesofisrael.com/study-young-on-line-israelis-hyper-connected-adults-not-far-behind/
J. Cole, Using Moodle, Sebastopol: O’Reilly, 2005.
C. Romero, S. Ventura, and E. Garcia, “Data Mining in Course Management Systems: Moodle case study and tutorial,” Comput. and Educ., Vol. 51, pp. 368-384, Aug. 2008.
F.D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quart., Vol. 13, pp. 319-339, Sept. 1989.
H. Lou, W. Luo, and D. Strong, “Perceived Critical Mass Effect on Groupware Acceptance,” European J. of Inform. Syst., Vol. 9, pp. 91-102, Jun. 2000.
E.W.T Ngai, J.K.L. Poon, and Y.H.C. Chan, “Empirical Examination of the Adoption of WebCT using TAM,” Comput. and Educ., Vol. 48, pp. 250-267, Feb. 2007.
R.A. Sanchez and A.D. Hueros, “Motivational Factors that Influence the Acceptance of Moodle using TAM,” Comput. in Human Behavior, Vol. 26, pp. 1632-1640, Nov. 2010.
J.W. Moon and Y.G. Kim, “Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web Context,” Inform. and Manage., Vol. 38, pp. 217-230, Feb. 2001.
H-H. Hsu, “The Acceptance of Moodle: an empirical study based on UTAUT,” Creative Educ., Vol. 3, pp. 44-46, Dec. 2012.
T. Escobar- Rodriguez and P. Monge-Lozano, “The Acceptance of Moodle Technology by Business Administration Students,” Comput. and Educ., Vol. 58, pp. 1085-1093, May 2012.
K. Brandl, “Are You Ready to “Moodle?”, Language Learning and Tech., Vol. 9, pp. 16-23, May 2005.
M. DeSchryver, P. Mishra, M Koehleer, and A. Francis, “Moodle vs. Facebook: does using Facebook for discussions in an online course enhance perceived social presence and student interaction?”, in Soc. for Inform Tech. and Teacher Educ. Int. Conference, Vol. 2009, No. 1, pp. 329-336, 2009.
S. Rahm-Barnett, “Thinking Out Loud: engaging eLearners in your thought process…and other amazing mind reading tricks,” presented at the 4th annual Heartland eLearning Conference, Edmond, OK, 2013.