Modelling tree density effects on provisioning ecosystem services in Europe

Agroforestry Systems - Tập 93 - Trang 1985-2007 - 2018
Josep Crous-Duran1, Anil R. Graves2, Joana A. Paulo1, Jaconette Mirck3, Tânia S. Oliveira1, Sonja Kay4, Silvestre García de Jalón2, João H. N. Palma1
1Forest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
2Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK
3Department of Soil Protection and Recultivation, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany
4Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland

Tóm tắt

Agroforestry systems, in which trees are integrated in arable or pasture land, can be used to enable sustainable food, material, and energy production (i.e. provide provisioning ecosystem services) whilst reducing the negative environmental impacts associated with farming. However, one constraint on the uptake of agroforestry in Europe is a lack of knowledge on how specific agroforestry designs affect productivity. A process-based biophysical model, called Yield-SAFE, was used: (1) to quantify the food, material and biomass energy production of four contrasting case study systems in Europe in a common energy unit (MJ ha−1), and (2) to quantify how tree density determined the supply of provisioning ecosystem services. The Yield-SAFE model was calibrated so that simulated tree and crop growth fitted observed growth data for reference monoculture forestry, pasture, and arable systems. The modelled results showed that including trees in pasture or arable systems increased the overall accumulated energy of the system in comparison with monoculture forestry, pasture, and arable systems, but that the accumulated energy per tree was reduced as tree density increased. The greatest accumulated energy occurred in the highest tree density agroforestry system at all the case study sites. This suggests that the capture of environmental resources, such as light and water, for obtaining provisioning services is most effective in high density agroforestry systems. Further modelling should include tree canopy effects on micro-climatic and the impact this has on pasture, crop, and livestock yields, as well as the impact of tree density on the economic value and management of the different systems.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Benavides R, Douglas GB, Osoro K (2009) Silvopastoralism in New Zealand: review of effects of evergreen and deciduous trees on pasture dynamics. Agrofor Syst 76:327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9186-6 Burgess PJ, Rosati A (2018) Advances in European agroforestry: results from the AGFORWARD project. Agrofor Syst 92:801–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0261-3 Burgess PJ, Incoll LD, Corry DT, Beaton A, Hart BJ (2005) Poplar (Populus spp.) growth and crop yields in a silvoarable experiment at three lowland sites in England. Agrofor Syst 63:157–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-004-7169-9 Burgess PJ, Crous-Duran J, den Herder M, Dupraz C, Fagerholm N, Freese D, Garnett K, Graves A, Hermansen J, Liagre F, Mirck J, Moreno G, Mosquera-Losada M, Palma JHN, Pantera A, Plieninger T, Upson M (2015) AGFORWARD project periodic report: January to December 2014, 95 p. Cranfield University, Cranfield (UK). AGFORWARD project. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/9199. Accessed 17 Oct 2018 Chirko CP, Gold MA, Nguyen PV, Jiang JP (1996) Influence of direction and distance from trees on wheat yield and photosynthetic photon flux density (Qp) in a Paulownia and wheat intercropping system. For Ecol Manage 83:171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(96)03721-8 Coe R, Sinclair F, Barrios E (2014) Scaling up agroforestry requires research ‘in’ rather than ‘for’ development. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:73–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.013 Cubera E, Nunes JM, Madeira M, Gazarini L (2009) Influence of Quercus ilex trees on herbaceous production and nutrient concentrations in southern Portugal. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:565–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200800191 Cuddington K, Fortin MJ, Gerber LR, Hastings A, Liebhold A, O’Connor M, Ray C (2013) Process-based models are required to manage ecological systems in a changing world. Ecosphere 4:art20. https://doi.org/10.1890/es12-00178.1 den Herder M, Moreno G, Mosquera-losada RM, Palma JHN, Sidiropoulou A, Santiago-Freijanes JJ, Crous-duran J, Paulo JA, Tomé M, Pantera A, Papanastasis VP, Mantzanas K, Pachana P, Papadopoulos A, Plieninger T, Burgess P (2017) Current extent and stratification of agroforestry in the European Union. Agric Ecosyst Environ 241:121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.03.005 Eastham J, Rose CW, Charles Edwards DA et al (1990) Planting density effects of water use efficiency of trees and pasture in an agroforestry experiment. N Z J For Sci 20:39–53 Garrity DP, Akinnifesi FK, Ajayi OC, Weldesemayat SG, Mowo JG, Kalinganire A, Larwanou M, Bayala J (2010) Evergreen agriculture: a robust approach to sustainable food security in Africa. Food Secur 2:197–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-010-0070-7 Glover JD, Reganold JP, Cox CM (2012) Agriculture: plant perennials to save Africa’s soils. Nature 489:359–361. https://doi.org/10.1038/489359a Godinho S, Guiomar N, Machado R, Santos P, Sá-Sousa P, Fernandes JP, Neves N, Pinto-Correia T (2014) Assessment of environment, land management and spatial variables on recent changes in montado land cover in southern Portugal. Agrofor Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9757-7 Graves AR, Burgess PJ, Palma JHN, Herzog F, Moreno G, Bertomeu M, Dupraz C, Liagre F, Keesman K, van der Werf W, de Nooy AK, van den Briel JPP (2007) Development and application of bio-economic modelling to compare silvoarable, arable, and forestry systems in three European countries. Ecol Eng 29:434–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.09.018 Graves AR, Burgess PJ, Palma J, Keesman K, Van der Werf W, Dupraz C, van Keulen H, Herzog F, Mayus M (2010) Implementation and calibration of the parameter-sparse Yield-SAFE model to predict production and land equivalent ratio in mixed tree and crop systems under two contrasting production situations in Europe. Ecol Model 221:1744–1756 Gruenewald H, Brandt BKV, Schneider BU, Bens O, Kendzia G, Hüttl RF (2007) Agroforestry systems for the production of woody biomass for energy transformation purposes. Ecol Eng 29:319–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.09.012 Herzog F (1998) Streuobst: a traditional agroforestry system as a model for agroforestry development in temperate Europe. Agrofor Syst 42:61–80. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006152127824 Hodgson J (1990) Grazing Management: science into practice. longman handbooks in agriculture. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow IAASTD (2009) Synthesis report: agriculture at a crossroads. International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development. Island Press, Washington DC. http://apps.unep.org/redirect.php?file=/publications/pmtdocuments/-Agriculture%20at%20a%20crossroads%20-%20Synthesis%20report-2009Agriculture_at_Crossroads_Synthesis_Report.pdf. Accessed 17 Oct 2018 Jose S, Gillespie AR, Pallardy SG (2004) Interspecific interactions in temperate agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 61–62:237–255. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000029002.85273.9b Kanzler M, Mirck J (2017) Lesson learnt report: alley cropping in Germany. AGFORWARD project. BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg, 03046 Cottbus, Germany. https://www.agforward.eu/index.php/en/alley-cropping-systems-in-germany.html?file=files/agforward/documents/LessonsLearnt/WP4_D_Alley_cropping_lessons-learnt_final.pdf. Accessed 17 Oct 2018 López-Díaz ML, Rolo V, Benítez R, Moreno G (2015) Shrub encroachment of Iberian dehesas: implications on total forage productivity. Agrofor Syst 89:587–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9793-y Mirck J, Kanzler M, Quinkenstein A (2016) Agforward project system Report: Alley Cropping in Germany. AGFORWARD project. BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg, 03046 Cottbus, Germany. https://www.agforward.eu/index.php/pt/integracao-de-arvores-e-culturas-arvenses-alemanha-862.html?file=files/agforward/documents/WP4%20Initial%20Stakeholder%20report%20BTU%20Arable%20final.pdf. Accessed 17 Oct 2018 Moreno G, Aviron S, Berg S, Crous-Duran J, Franca A, García de Jalón S, Hartel T, Mirck J, Pantera A, Palma JHN, Paulo JA, Re GA, Sanna F, Thenail C, Varga A, Viaud V, Burgess PJ (2018) Agroforestry systems of high nature and cultural value in Europe: provision of commercial goods and other ecosystem services. Agrofor Syst 92:877–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0126-1 Olea L, San Miguel-Ayanz A (2006) The Spanish dehesa, a traditional Mediterranean silvopastoral system. In: 21st General meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Badajoz, Spain Palma JHN (2017) Clipick–climate change web picker. A tool bridging daily climate needs in process based modelling in forestry and agriculture. For Syst 26:1–4. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2017261-10251 Palma JHN, Graves AR, Burgess PJ, van der Werf W, Herzog F (2007) Integrating environmental and economic performance to assess modern silvoarable agroforestry in Europe. Ecol Econ 63:759–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.011 Palma JHN, Graves AR, Crous-Duran J, Upson M, Paulo JA, Oliveira TS, Garcia de Jalón S, Burgess PJ (2016). Yield-SAFE model improvements. Report for Milestone 29 (6.4) of the AGFORWARD project, Lisboa. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/12337. Accessed 17 Oct 2018 Palma JHN, Oliveira TSO, Crous-Duran J, Graves AR, Garcia de Jalón S, Upson M, Giannitsopoulos M, Burgess PJ, Paulo JA, Tomé M, Ferreiro-Dominguéz N, Mosquera-Losada MR, Gonzalez-Hernández P, Kay S, Mirk J, Kanzler M, Smith J, Moreno G, Pantera A, Mantovani D, Rosati A, Luske B, Hermansen J (2017) Deliverable 6.17 (6.2): modelled agroforestry outputs at field and farm scale to support biophysical and environmental assessments AGFORWARD project. 18 October 2017, 162 p. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/14799. Accessed 17 Oct 2018 Pisanelli A, Paris P, Marandola D, Romano R, Marongiu S, Rosati A (2014) The role of EU rural development policy in supporting agroforestry systems in EU Italian working group in agroforestry. In: Palma J, Chalmin A (eds) 2nd European agroforestry conference: integrating science and policy to promote agroforestry in practice. EURAF, Cottbus Reynolds PE, Simpson JA, Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM (2007) Effects of tree competition on corn and soybean photosynthesis, growth, and yield in a temperate tree-based agroforestry intercropping system in southern Ontario, Canada. Ecol Eng 29:362–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.09.024 Rivest D, Rolo V, López-Díaz L, Moreno G (2011) Shrub encroachment in Mediterranean silvopastoral systems: Retama sphaerocarpa and Cistus ladanifer induce contrasting effects on pasture and Quercus ilex production. Agric Ecosyst Environ 141:447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.04.018 Rivest D, Paquette A, Moreno G, Messier C (2013) A meta-analysis reveals mostly neutral influence of scattered trees on pasture yield along with some contrasted effects depending on functional groups and rainfall conditions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 165:74–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.12.010 Salkanovic E (2017) Simulation of agronomic productivity in a Combined Food and Energy (CFE) system in Denmark using the Yield-SAFE Model. Master Thesis. University of Copenhagen. Faculty of Science, Department of Plant and Environmental Science Sereke F, Graves AR, Dux D, Palma JHN, Herzog F (2015) Innovative agroecosystem goods and services: key profitability drivers in Swiss agroforestry. Agron Sustain Dev 35:759–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0261-2 Smith J, Pearce BD, Wolfe MS (2013) Reconciling productivity with protection of the environment: is temperate agroforestry the answer? Renew Agric Food Syst 28:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170511000585 Toillon J, Fichot R, Dallé E et al (2013) Planting density affects growth and water-use efficiency depending on site in Populus deltoides × P. nigra. For Ecol Manage 304:345–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.017 Torralba M, Fagerholm N, Burgess PJ, Moreno G, Plieninger T (2016) Do European agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services? a meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 230:150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.002 van der Werf W, Keesman K, Burgess P, Graves A, Pilbeam D, Incoll LDD, Metselaar K, Mayus M, Stappers R, van Keulen H, Palma J, Dupraz C (2007) Yield-SAFE: a parameter-sparse, process-based dynamic model for predicting resource capture, growth, and production in agroforestry systems. Ecol Eng 29:419–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.09.017