Modelling problem-solving situations into number theory tasks: The route towards generalisation

Amit, M., & Neria, D. (2008). “Rising to challenge”: Using generalization in pattern problems to unearth the algebraic skills of talented pre-algebra students.ZDM, 40(1), 111–129. Arcavi, A. (1994). Symbol sense: Informal sense-making in formal mathematics.For the Learning of Mathematics, 14, 24–35. Balacheff, N. (1988). Aspects of proof in pupils’ practice of school mathematics. In D. Pimm (Ed.),Mathematics, teachers and children (pp. 216–235). Milton Keynes: Open University. Ball, D. L. (1988). Unlearning to teach mathematics.For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(1), 40–48. Becker, J. R., & Rivera, F. (2004). An investigation of beginning algebra students’ ability to generalize linear patterns. In M. J. Hoins & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.),Proceedings of the 28th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (vol. 1, p. 286). Bergen, Norway: Bergen University College. Brown, A., Thomas, K., & Tolias, G. (2002). Conceptions of divisibility: Success and understanding. In S. R. Campbell & R. Zazkis (Eds.),Learning and teaching number theory: Research in cognition and instruction (pp. 41–82). Westport, CT: Ablex. Carraher, D., Martinez, M., & Schliemann, A. (2008). Early algebra and mathematics generalization.ZDM, 40(1), 3–22. Cooper, M., & Sakane, H. (1986). Comparative experimental study of children’s strategies with deriving a mathematical law. InProceedings of the 10th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 410–414). London: University of London, Institute of Education. Cooper, T. & Warren, E. (2008). The effect of different representations on Year 3 to 5 students’ ability to generalise.ZDM, 40(1), 23–37. Douady, R., & Parzysz, B. (1998). Geometry in the classroom. In C. Mammana & V. Villani (Eds.),Perspectives on the teaching of geometry for the 21 st century (pp. 159–192). Kluwer: Netherlands. Ellis, A. (2007). Connections between generalizing and justifying: Students’ reasoning with linear relationships.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 194–229. Ginat, D. (2006). Overlooking number patterns in algorithmic problem solving. In R. Zazkis & S. R. Campbell (Eds.),Number theory in mathematics education: Perspectives and prospects (pp. 223–248). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Harel, G. & Tall, D. (1991). The general, the abstract, and the generic in advanced mathematics.For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(1), 38–42. Iatridou, M., & Papadopoulos, I. (2010). From area to number theory: A case study. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.),Proceedings of the 6 th Conference of European Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 599–608). Institut National De Recherche Pedagogique, Lyon. Ishida, J. (1997). The teaching of general solution methods to pattern finding problems through focusing on an evaluation and improvement process.School Science and Mathematics, 97, 155–162. Kaput, J. J. (1992). Teaching and learning a new algebra. In E. Fennena & T. Romberg (Eds.),Mathematics classroom that promote understanding (pp.133–155). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Kieran, C. & Guzman, J. (2006). Number theoretic experience of 12 to 15 year olds in a calculator environment: The intertwining coemergence of technique and theory. In R. Zazkis & S. R. Campbell (Eds.),Number theory in mathematics education: Perspectives and prospects (pp. 173–200). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Krutetskii, V. A. (1976).The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lee, L., & Wheeler, D. (1987).Algebraic thinking in high school students: Their conceptions of generalisation and justification. Research Report. Montreal: Concordia University. Lester, F. K. (1985). Methodological considerations in research on mathematical problem solving. In E. A. Silver (Ed.),Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 41–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Mamona-Downs, J. & Papadopoulos, I. (in press). Problem-solving activity ancillary to the concept of area.Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.),Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 65–86). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer. Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (1982).Thinking mathematically. New York: Addison Wesley. Orton, J., Orton, A., & Roper, T. (1999). Pictorial and practical contexts and the perception of pattern. In A. Orton (Ed.),Patterns in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 121–136). London: Cassell Publishers. Polya, G. (1957).How to solve it. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Polya, G. (1968).Mathematics and plausible reasoning: Vol. 2. Patterns of plausible inference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Rico, L. (1996). The role of representation systems in the learning of numerical structures. In L. Puig & A. Gutierrez (Eds.),Proceedings of the 20th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 87–102). Valencia, Spain. Schoenfeld, H. A. (1985).Mathematical problem solving. Academic Press, Inc. Schoenfeld, H. A. (1988). Mathematics, technology and higher order thinking. In R. Nickerson & P. Zodhiates (Eds.),Technology in education: Looking toward 2020 (pp. 67-96). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Sinclair, N., Zazkis, R., & Liljedahl, P. (2004). Number worlds: Visual and experimental access to elementary number theory concepts.International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 8, 235–263. Sriraman, B. (2003). Mathematical giftedness, problem solving, and the ability to formulate generalizations: The problem-solving experiences of four gifted students.Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14, 151–165. Sriraman, B. (2004). Reflective abstraction, uniframes and the formulation of generalizations.Journal of Mathematical behavior, 23(2), 205–222. Stacey, K. (1989). Finding and using patterns in linear generalising problems.Educational Studies of Mathematics, 20(2), 147–164. Steele, D. (2008). Seventh-grade students’ representations for pictorial growth and change problems.ZDM, 40(1), 97–110. Steele, D. F., & Johanning, D. I. (2004). A schematic-theoretic view of problem solving and the development of algebraic thinking.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 65–90. Zazkis, R., & Campbell, S. R. (1996). Divisibility and multiplicative structure of natural numbers: Preservice teachers’ understanding.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 540–563. Zazkis, R., & Liljedahl, P. (2004). Understanding primes: The role of representation.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 164–186. Zazkis, R., Liljedahl, P., & Chernoff, E. (2008). The role of examples in forming and refuting generalizations.ZDM, 40(1), 131–141. Zazkis, R. (1998). Odds and ends of odds and evens: An inquiry into students’ understanding of even and odd numbers.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36(1), 73–89. Zazkis, R. (2000). Factors, divisors and multiples: Exploring the web of students’ connections. In A. Schoenfels, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.),Research in collegiate mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 210–238). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. Zazkis, R. (2007). Number Theory in mathematics education: Queen and servant. In J. Novotna & H. Moraova (Eds.),Proceedings of the International Symposium Elementary Maths Teaching SEMT ’07 (pp. 46–59). The Czech Republic: Charles University, Prague.