Modeling and Measuring the Structure of Professional Vision in Preservice Teachers

American Educational Research Journal - Tập 51 Số 4 - Trang 739-771 - 2014
Tina Seidel1,2, Kathleen Stürmer1,2
1Technical University of Munich
2Technische Universität München

Tóm tắt

Professional vision has been identified as an important element of teacher expertise that can be developed in teacher education. It describes the use of knowledge to notice and interpret significant features of classroom situations. Three aspects of professional vision have been described by qualitative research: describe, explain, and predict classroom situations. We refer to these aspects in order to model professional vision. We developed a video-based instrument to empirically test the model. The results show that our measure to assess aspects of professional vision differentiates between description, explanation, and prediction. The study provides insight into the structure of professional vision, allowing us to conceptualize it theoretically and discuss the targeted use for teaching and formative assessment of preservice teachers.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1093/her/cy1086

Baker F. B., 2004, Item response theory. Parameter estimation techniques, 2, 10.1201/9781482276725

10.3102/0002831209345157

10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00004-6

Blomberg G., 2013, Journal of Educational Research Online, 5, 3

10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.008

Bond T. G., 2001, Applying the Rasch model, 10.4324/9781410600127

10.3102/0013189X033008003

Borko H., 2008, Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417, 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012

10.3102/00028312026004473

10.1016/0959-4752(95)00019-4

Briggs D. C., 2003, Journal of Applied Measurement, 4, 87

Brophy J., 2004, Using video in teacher education

Brouwer N., 2010, International encyclopedia of education, 7, 503, 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00644-8

10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.07.008

10.1016/0742-051X(87)90015-1

10.1177/0022487103054003001

Cochran-Smith M., 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education

10.1177/0022487105283796

10.1177/0022487109348024

Darling-Hammond L., 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do

Deci E. L., 2002, The handbook of self-determination research

10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.341

Embretson S. E., 2000, Item response theory for psychologists

Ericsson K. A., 1993, Psychological Review, 100, 363, 10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363

Fraser B. J., 1987, International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 145, 10.1016/0883-0355(87)90035-8

Goldman R., 2007, Video research in the learning sciences

Goldstein G., 2000, Handbook of psychological assessment

10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100

10.3102/0002831207312906

10.1080/1047621022000007594

Hattie J., 2009, Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement

10.3102/00028312042002371

10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3

10.1177/016327879401700202

10.1177/0013164407313369

10.1027/0044-3409.216.2.61

Koster B., 2005, Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 157, 10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.004

10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.002

10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.001

Muthèn L. K., 1998, Mplus user’s guide, 6

Moosbrugger H., 2002, Psychologische Beiträge, 44, 136

Noguchi K., 2012, Journal of Statistical Software, 50, 1, 10.18637/jss.v050.i12

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2005, PISA 2003 technical report

Oser F., 2010, Unterrichtswissenschaft, 38, 5

10.2307/1176586

Rauch P., 2010, Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 354

Resnick L., 1987, Education and learning to think

Reusser K. (2005–2009). Videoportal [Training videos]. Retrieved from http://www.didac.uzh.ch/videoportal/

10.1177/0022487110369555

10.1007/s10857-007-9029-9.

Schäfer S., Journal of Educational Research Online

Seidel T., 2010, Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 56, 296

Seidel T., Blomberg G., Stürmer K. (2010b). Observer: video-based tool to diagnose teachers’ professional vision. [Software]. Unpublished instrument, retrieved from http://ww3.unipark.de/uc/observer_engl/demo/kv/

Seidel T., Blomberg G., Renkl A. (2013). Instructional strategies for using video in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 56–65. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.004

Seidel T., 2007, Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 10, 201

Seidel T., 2005, How to run a video study: Technical report of the IPN Video Study

Seidel T., 2003, Unterrichtswissenschaft, 31, 142

10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.08.004

10.3102/0034654307310317

Shavelson R. J., 1991, Performance assessment for the workplace

Sherin M. G., 2011, Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes, 10.4324/9780203832714

10.1177/0022487108328155

Shulman L. S., 1987, Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1, 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7

Stokking K., 2003, European Journal of Teacher Education, 26, 329, 10.1080/0261976032000128175

10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02075.x

10.1007/s11612-013-0216-0

van Es E., 2009, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 100, 10.1080/10508400802581668

van Es E., 2002, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571

van Es E., 2008, Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244, 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005

10.1037/a0025125

10.3102/00346543073001089

Wilson M., 2005, Constructing measures. An item responses modeling approach

Wu M. L., 1997, ConQuest: Multi-aspect test software