Model-Based Feature Information Network (MFIN): A Digital Twin Framework to Integrate Location-Specific Material Behavior Within Component Design, Manufacturing, and Performance Analysis
Tóm tắt
The digital transformation of manufacturing requires digitalization, including automatic and efficient data exchange. Model-based definitions (MBDs) capture digital product definitions, in order to eliminate error-prone information exchange associated with traditional paper-based drawings and to provide contextual information through additional metadata. The flow of MBDs extends throughout the product lifecycle (including the design, analysis, manufacturing, in service life, and retirement stages) and can be extended beyond the typical geometry and tolerance information within a computer-aided design. In this paper, the MBDs are extended to include materials information, via dynamic linkages. To this end, a model-based feature information network (MFIN) is created to provide a comprehensive framework that facilitates storing, updating, searching, and retrieving of relevant information across a product’s lifecycle. The use case of a damage tolerant analysis for a compressor bladed-disk (blisk) is demonstrated, in Ti-6Al-4V blade(s) linear friction welded to the Ti-6Al-4V disk, creating well-defined regions exhibiting grain refinement and high residuals stresses. By capturing the location-specific microstructure and residual stress values at the weld regions, this information is accessed within the MFIN and used for downstream damage tolerant analysis. The introduction of the MFIN framework facilitates access to dynamically evolving data for use within physics-based models (resulting in the opportunity to reduce uncertainty in subsequent prognosis analyses), thereby enabling a digital twin description of the component or system.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Tuegel EJ, Ingraffea AR, Eason TG, Spottswood SM (2011) Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin. Int J of Aerosp Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/154798
Glaessgen E, Stargel D (2012, April). The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and US Air Force vehicles. In: 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference and 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures conference 14th AIAA. Honolulu, Hawaii (p. 1818). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-1818
Grieves M, Vickers J (2017). Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In: Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems. Springer, Cham, pp. 85–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7
Tuegel EJ, Kobryn P, Zweber JV, Kolonay RM (2017, January). Digital Thread and Twin for Systems Engineering: Design to Retirement. In: 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Grapevine, Texas (p. 0876). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0876
Christodoulou L, Larsen JM (2004) Using materials prognosis to maximize the utilization potential of complex mechanical systems. JOM 56:15–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-004-0027-4
National Research Council (2008) Integrated computational materials engineering: a transformational discipline for improved competitiveness and national security. National Academies Press, Washington
Furrer DU, Dimiduk DM, Cotton JD, Ward CH (2017) Making the case for a model-based definition of engineering materials. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 6:249–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-017-0102-7
Sangid MD, Matlik JF, Keskin A, Thacker BH, Bichon, BJ, Ball DL, Engelstead SP, Ward C, Venkatesh V, Kim HA, Saraf V, Gorham R (2017, January). Integrating ICME practices into design systems and structural analysis. In: 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Grapevine, Texas. (p. 0874). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0874
Ramalhete PS, Senos AMR, Aguiar C (2010) Digital tools for material selection in product design. Mater Des 31:2275–2287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.12.013
Arnold SM, Holland FA, Bednarcyk BA, Pineda EJ (2015) Combining material and model pedigree is foundational to making ICME a reality. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 4:37–62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40192-015-0031-2
Bolcavage A, Brown PD, Cedoz R, Cooper N, Deaton C, Hartman DR, Keskin A, Ma K, Matlik JF, Modgil G, Stillinger JD (2014) Integrated computational materials engineering from a gas turbine engine perspective. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 3:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9772-3-13
Briggs C, Brown GB, Siebenaler D, Faoro J, Rowe S (2010, April). Model-Based Definition. In: 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 18th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 12th. Orlando, Florida. (p. 3138). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-3138
Ruemler SP, Zimmerman KE, Hartman NW, Hedberg T, Barnard Feeny A (2017) Promoting model-based definition to establish a complete product definition. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 139:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034625
Hedberg T, Lubell J, Fischer L, Maggiano L, Feeney AB (2016) Testing the digital thread in support of model-based manufacturing and inspection. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 16:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032697
Miller AMD, Alvarez R, Hartman N (2018) Towards an extended model-based definition for the digital twin. Comput Aided Des Appl 15:880–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2018.1462569
Gopalakrishnan S, Hartman NW, Sangid MD (2020) Integrating materials model-based definitions into design, manufacturing, and sustainment: a digital twin demonstration of incorporating residual stresses in the lifecycle analysis of a turbine disk. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 21:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4048426
Morse E, Heysiattalab S, Barnard-Feeney A, Hedberg T (2016) Interoperability: Linking Design and Tolerancing with Metrology. Proc CIRP 43:13–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.106
Kwon S, Monnier LV, Barbau R, Bernstein WZ (2020) Enriching standards-based digital thread by fusing as-designed and as-inspected data using knowledge graphs. Adv Eng Inform 46:101102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101102
Pratt MJ (2001) Introduction to ISO 10303—the STEP standard for product data exchange. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 1:102–103. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1354995
Siemens (2017) NX 11.0 CAD Software. Munich, Germany. https://docs.plm.automation.siemens.com/tdoc/nx/11.0.1/nx_help#uid:xid1128415:index_exnx. Accessed 16 November 2020
Capvidia (2016) MBDVidia 4.0 Software. Houston, Texas. https://www.capvidia.com/products/mbdvidia. Accessed 16 November 2020
International Organization for Standardization (2016) Automation systems and integration—Quality information framework (QIF)—An integrated model for manufacturing quality information (ISO 23952:2020). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/77461.html
Leach P, Mealling M, Salz R (2005) RFC 4122: A universally unique identifier (UUID) URN namespace. (https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4122.txt)
Bigot PA (2014) PyXB: Python XML Schema Bindings. https://pyxb.sourceforge.net/. Accessed 16 November 2020
Astheimer RL, Del Re K, Gopalakrishnan S, Hartman NW, Sangid MD (2019, June). Extending model based definition to capture product behavior and contextual information using a model based feature information network. Proceedings of CAD'19. Singapore. (pp 253–257). https://doi.org/10.14733/cadconfP.2019.253-257
Granta Design Ltd (2016) Granta MI. Cambridge, UK. https://www.ansys.com/products/materials/granta-mi/. Accessed 16 November 2020
MSC Software (2016) Material center. Newport Beach, CA, USA. https://www.mscsoftware.com/product/materialcenter. Accessed 16 November 2020
MSC Software (2016) NASTRAN, Version 2016.0. Newport Beach, CA, USA. https://www.mscsoftware.com/product/msc-nastran. Accessed 16 November 2020
MSC Software (2016) PATRAN, Version 2016.0. Newport Beach, CA, USA. https://www.mscsoftware.com/product/patran. Accessed 16 November 2020
Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corporation (2018) Abaqus/CAE Simulia. Johnston, RI, USA. https://www.3ds.com/products-services/simulia/services-support/support/documentation/. Accessed 16 November 2020
International Organization for Standardization (2010) Industrial automation systems and integration—Product data representation and exchange—Part 214: Application protocol: Core data for automotive mechanical design processes (ISO 10303-214). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/43669.html
Li W, Vairis A, Preuss M, Ma T (2016) Linear and rotary friction welding review. Int Mater Rev 61:71–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2015.1109214
Turner R, Gebelin JC, Ward RM, Reed RC (2011) Linear friction welding of Ti-6Al-4V: Modelling and validation. Acta Mater 59:3792–3803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.02.028
Grujicic M, Arakere G, Pandurangan B, Yen CF, Cheeseman BA (2012) Process modeling of Ti-6Al-4V linear friction welding (LFW). J Mater Eng Perform 21:2011–2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-011-0097-8
Bandyopadhyay R, Rotella J, Naragani D, Park JS, Eff M, Sangid MD (2019) Residual Strain Analysis in Linear Friction Welds of Similar and Dissimilar Titanium Alloys Using Energy Dispersive X-ray Diffraction. Metall Mater Trans A 50:704–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-018-5034-0
Pan Z, Shih DS, Tabei A, Garmestani H, Liang SY (2017) Modeling of Ti-6Al-4V machining force considering material microstructure evolution. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:2673–2680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9964-7
Li Y, Wang H, Gong D (2012) The interrelation of the parameters in the Paris equation of fatigue crack growth. Eng Fract Mech 96:500–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.08.016
Spasic I (2012) https://grabcad.com/library/blisk. Accessed 16 November 2020
John R, Larsen JM, Buchanan DJ, Ashbaugh NE (2001, October) Incorporating residual stresses in life prediction of turbine engine disks. In: Proceedings from NATO RTO (AVT) Symposium on Monitoring and Management of Gas Turbine Fleets for Extended Life and Reduced Costs. Manchester, UK. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/p014133.pdf
Enright M, Chan K (2004) Extension of a microstructure-based fatigue crack growth model for predicting fatigue life variability. In: Probabilistic Aspects of Life Prediction. STP1450-EB, W Johnson, B Hillberry, (Eds.). (pp. 87–103). https://doi.org/10.1520/STP11281S
Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21:31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9
Hall EO (1951) The deformation and ageing of mild steel: II Characteristics of the Lüders deformation. Proc Phys Soc London, Sect B 64:742–747. https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1301/64/9/302
Petch NJ (1953) The cleavage strength of polycrystals. J Iron Steel Inst 173(5):25–28
Cláudio RA, Branco CM, Gomes EC, Byrne J, Harrison GF, Winstone MR (2004) Fatigue life prediction and failure analysis of a gas turbine disc using the finite-element method. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 27(9):849–860
Cook CH, Spaeth CE, Hunter DT, Hill RJ (1982, April). Damage tolerant design of turbine engine disks. In: ASME 1982 International Gas Turbine Conference and Exhibit. London, England. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection. https://doi.org/10.1115/82-GT-311
Annis Jr CG, VanWanderham MC, Harris Jr JA, Sims DL (1980, March). Gas Turbine Engine Disk Retirement-for-Cause: An Application of Fracture Mechanics and NDE. In: Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. New Orleans, Louisiana. (Vol. 79665, p. V01BT02A033). https://doi.org/10.1115/80-GT-127
Walker K (1970). The Effect of Stress Ratio During Crack Propagation and Fatigue for 2024-T3 and 7075-T6 Aluminum. In: Effects of Environment and Complex Load History on Fatigue Life, ASTM International, M Rosenfeld (Ed.), West Conshohocken, PA, (pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.1520/STP32032S
Kraft EM (2016, January). The air force digital thread/digital twin-life cycle integration and use of computational and experimental knowledge. In: 54th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting. San Diego, California. (p. 0897). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-0897
Lee SG, Ma YS, Thimm GL, Verstraeten J (2008) Product lifecycle management in aviation maintenance, repair and overhaul. Comput Ind 59:296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2007.06.022
Zhang JM, Zhang Y, Xu KW, Ji V (2007) Anisotropic elasticity in hexagonal crystals. Thin Solid Films 515:7020–7024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2007.01.045
Kasemer M, Quey R, Dawson P (2017) The influence of mechanical constraints introduced by β annealed microstructures on the yield strength and ductility of Ti-6Al-4V. J Mech Phys Solids 103:179–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2017.03.013
Kartal ME (2013). Analytical solutions for determining residual stresses in two-dimensional domains using the contour method. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci 469(2159):20130367. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2013.0367
Bouchard PJ, Budden PJ, Withers PJ (2012) Fourier basis for the engineering assessment of cracks in residual stress fields. Eng Fract Mech 91:37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.05.004
Pan J, Lin SH (2005) Fracture mechanics and fatigue crack propagation. Fatigue testing and analysis, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 237–284