Mixture enhances productivity in a two‐species forest: evidence from a modeling approach

Ecological Research - Tập 27 Số 1 - Trang 83-94 - 2012
Thomas Pérot1, Nicolas Picard2
1Cemagref, Unité Ecosystèmes Forestiers, Domaine des Barres Nogent‐sur‐Vernisson 45290 France
2CIRAD Libreville BP 4035 Gabon

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe effect of mixture on productivity has been widely studied for applications related to agriculture but results in forestry are scarce due to the difficulty of conducting experiments. Using a modeling approach, we analyzed the effect of mixture on the productivity of forest stands composed of sessile oak and Scots pine. To determine whether mixture had a positive effect on productivity and if there was an optimum mixing proportion, we used an aggregation technique involving a mean‐field approximation to analyze a distance‐dependent individual‐based model. We conducted a local sensitivity analysis to identify the factors that influenced the results the most. Our model made it possible to predict the species proportion where productivity peaks. This indicates that transgressive over‐yielding can occur in these stands and suggests that the two species are complementary. For the studied growth period, mixture does have a positive effect on the productivity of oak‐pine stands. Depending on the plot, the optimum species proportion ranges from 38 to 74% of oak and the gain in productivity compared to the current mixture is 2.2% on average. The optimum mixing proportion mainly depends on parameters concerning intra‐specific oak competition and yet, intra‐specific competition higher than inter‐specific competition was not sufficient to ensure over‐yielding in these stands. Our work also shows how results obtained for individual tree growth may provide information on the productivity of the whole stand. This approach could help us to better understand the link between productivity, stand characteristics, and species growth parameters in mixed forests.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1007/s00468-006-0049-3

Biging GS, 1992, A comparison of distance‐dependent competition measures for height and basal area growth of individual conifer trees, For Sci, 38, 695

Brown AHF, 1992, The ecology of mixed‐species stands of trees, 125

10.1139/x03-232

10.1002/9781119115151

Wit CT, 1960, On competition

10.1051/forest/2009035

10.1017/CBO9780511525537

Garber SM, 2004, Stand productivity and development in two mixed‐species spacing trials in the central Oregon cascades, For Sci, 50, 92

Harper JL, 1977, Population biology of plants

10.1890/08-1813.1

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01865.x

10.1126/science.286.5442.1123

10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00337.x

10.1890/04-0922

10.1002/9780470725160

10.1007/s11284-009-0668-4

Ishii HT, 2004, Exploring the relationships among canopy structure, stand productivity, and biodiversity of temperature forest ecosystems, For Sci, 50, 342

10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00470.x

10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.011

10.1007/978-94-015-8052-6

Levin SA, 1997, Spatial ecology: the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions, 271

10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12685.x

10.1126/science.1064088

Loreau M, 2002, Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: synthesis and perspectives, 10.1093/oso/9780198515708.001.0001

Lotwick HW, 1982, Methods for analysing spatial processes of several types of points, J Royal Stat Soc B, 44, 406

10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00341-1

MCPFE, UNECE, FAO, 2007, State of Europe's forests 2007

Morneau F, 2008, Les forêts mélangées en France métropolotaine. Caractérisation à partir des résultats de l'Inventaire Forestier National, Revue Forestiere Francaise, 107

Ngo Bieng MA, 2006, A first typology of Oak and Scots pine mixed stands in the Orleans forest (France), based on the canopy spatial structure, N Z J Forest Sci, 36, 325

10.1890/0012-9615(2006)076[0521:TTSDAW]2.0.CO;2

10.1051/forest/2010004

10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00380-5

10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.065

10.1007/3-540-26599-6_3

10.1007/978-3-540-88307-4

10.1007/s10342-008-0215-9

Ripley BD, 1977, Modelling spatial patterns, J Royal Stat Soc B, 39, 172

10.1093/jpe/rtn011

10.1051/forest:2004061

10.1051/forest:2007025

10.1007/s11284-005-0127-9

10.1126/science.1060391

10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00867.x

10.1017/CBO9780511623523

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01016.x