Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come

Educational Researcher - Tập 33 Số 7 - Trang 14-26 - 2004
R. Burke Johnson1, Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie2
1University of South Alabama, College of Education, BSET, 3700 UCOM, Mobile, AL 36688; . His area of specialization is research methodology
2Department of Educational Measurement and Research, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, EDU 162, Tampa, FL 33620-7750; . His areas of specialization are disadvantaged and under-served populations (e.g., minorities and juvenile delinquents) and methodological topics in the areas of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods

Tóm tắt

The purposes of this article are to position mixed methods research ( mixed research is a synonym) as the natural complement to traditional qualitative and quantitative research, to present pragmatism as offering an attractive philosophical partner for mixed methods research, and to provide a framework for designing and conducting mixed methods research. In doing this, we briefly review the paradigm “wars” and incompatibility thesis, we show some commonalities between quantitative and qualitative research, we explain the tenets of pragmatism, we explain the fundamental principle of mixed research and how to apply it, we provide specific sets of designs for the two major types of mixed methods research ( mixed-model designs and mixed-method designs), and, finally, we explain mixed methods research as following (recursively) an eight-step process. A key feature of mixed methods research is its methodological pluralism or eclecticism, which frequently results in superior research (compared to monomethod research). Mixed methods research will be successful as more investigators study and help advance its concepts and as they regularly practice it.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ayer AJ, 1959, Logical positivism

Biesta GJJ, 2003, Pragmatism and educational research

Brewer J, 1989, Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles

10.2307/590553

10.1037/h0046016

Campbell DT, 1963, Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research

10.3102/00028312029002253

Creswell JW, 1994, Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches

Creswell JW, 2003, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches

Creswell JW, 2003, Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 209

10.1177/0959354303013003001

de Waal C, 2001, On Peirce

10.1037/14162-000

10.1097/00012272-199309000-00009

10.3102/01623737011003255

Guba EG, 1990, The paradigm dialog, 17

Guba EG, 1989, Fourth generation evaluation

10.1177/0959354303131003

10.3102/0013189X017008010

10.1086/444015

James W, 1907, Pragmatism

Johnson RB, 2004, Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches

Johnson RB, 2004, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association

Johnson RB, 2003, Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 297

Kuhn TS, 1962, The structure of scientific revolutions

10.7208/chicago/9780226217239.001.0001

10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Lincoln YS, 2000, Handbook of qualitative research, 163

Maxcy SJ, 2003, Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 51

Maxwell JA, 2003, Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 241

Maxwell SE, 2004, Designing experiments and analyzing data

Menand L, 1997, Pragmatism: A reader

Mertens DM, 2003, Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 135

10.1177/104973239800800307

10.1097/00006199-199103000-00014

Murphy JP, 1990, Pragmatism: From Peirce to Davidson

Nagel T, 1986, The view from nowhere

Newman I, 1998, Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum

Onwuegbuzie AJ, 2000, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Educational Research (AAER)

Onwuegbuzie AJ, 2002, Education, 122, 518

Onwuegbuzie AJ, 2003, Research in the Schools, 10, 71

Onwuegbuzie AJ, 2004, Library anxiety: Theory, research, and applications

Onwuegbuzie AJ, 2004, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association

OnwuegbuzieAJLeechNLOn becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies2004aManuscript submitted for publication

Onwuegbuzie AJ, 2004, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association

Onwuegbuzie AJ, Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology

Onwuegbuzie AJ, 2003, Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 351

Patton MQ, 1990, Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2

Peirce CS, 1878, Popular Science Monthly, 12, 286

Phillips DC, 2004, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association

Phillips DC, 2000, Postpositivism and educational research

Popper KR, 1959, The logic of scientific discovery

Reichardt CS, 1979, Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research, 7

10.1002/ev.1670

Rescher N, 2000, Realistic pragmatism: An introduction to pragmatic philosophy

10.1516/0020757001600057

10.1097/00012272-198604000-00005

10.3102/0013189X021005005

Schwandt TA, 2000, Handbook of qualitative research, 189

10.1016/0149-7189(94)00051-X

Shadish WR, 2002, Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference

10.1086/225467

10.3102/0013189X012003006

10.3102/01623737006004379

Tashakkori A, 1998, Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches

Tashakkori A, 2003, Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research

10.5840/monist199073340

Yin RK, 1984, Case study research: Design and methods

YuCHMisconceived relationships between logical positivism and quantitative research2003Research Methods Forum [On-line]. Retrieved September 2, 2004 fromhttp://www.aom.pace.edu/rmd/2002forum.html.