Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Giáo Dục Y Khoa Tỉnh Thức Trực Tuyến
Tóm tắt
Đại dịch COVID-19 đã làm gián đoạn giáo dục y khoa. Các lớp học trực tiếp và các vòng lặp lâm sàng đã bị hủy bỏ khẩn cấp, tiếp theo là cuộc di cư lịch sử và chưa từng có sang việc dạy học trực tuyến. Hầu hết các khóa học y khoa không được thiết kế để hoàn toàn trực tuyến, và các giảng viên cũng như sinh viên đều còn non nớt trong quá trình này. Mục đích của bài viết này là cung cấp các khuyến nghị cho các nhà giáo dục nhằm tối ưu hóa cách tiếp cận của họ trong việc chuyển đổi chương trình học trực tuyến. Dạy học trực tuyến một cách tỉnh thức tạo ra sự hiện diện, thiết lập bầu không khí và hỗ trợ đối thoại, thiết lập các thói quen nhằm xây dựng thực hành, mô phỏng các kỳ vọng nghề nghiệp, và thách thức nhưng cũng hỗ trợ người học.
Từ khóa
#COVID-19 #giáo dục y khoa #dạy học trực tuyến #chuyển đổi chương trình học #các phương pháp giảng dạyTài liệu tham khảo
Ernest P, Guitert Catasús M, Hampel R, Heiser S, Hopkins J, Murphy L, et al. Online teacher development: collaborating in a virtual learning environment. Comput Assist Lang Learn. 2013;26(4):311–33.
Hauck M, Stickler U. What does it take to teach online? Calico J. 2013;23(3):463–75.
Salmon G. Flying not flapping: a strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions ALT-J. 2005;13(3):201–18.
Wang Y, Han X, Yang J. Revisiting the blended learning literature: using a complex adaptive systems framework. Educ Technol Soc. 2015;18(2):380–93.
Brown J, Kurzweil M. Instructional quality, student outcomes and institutional finances. 2018;Accessed January 12, 2021 from: https://www.acenet.edu/Documents/Instructional-Quality-Student-Outcomes-and-Institutional-Finances.pdf.
Bettinger EP, Fox L, Loeb S, Taylor ES. Virtual classrooms: how online college courses affect student success. Am Econ Rev. 2017;107(9):2855–75.
Young A, Norgard C. Assessing the quality of online courses from the students’ perspective. Internet High Educ. 2006;9(2):107–15.
Chao T, Saj T, Tessier F. Establishing a quality review for online courses. Educause Quart. 2006;29(3):32–9.
Legon R. Measuring the impact of the Quality Matters rubric: a discussion of possibilities. J Dist Educ. 2015;29(3):166–73.
Puzziferro M, Shelton K. A model for developing high-quality online courses: integrating a systems approach with learning theory. JALN. 2008;12(4):119–36.
Rovai AF. A practical framework for evaluating online distance education programs. Internet High Educ. 2003;6(2):109–24.
Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR, Airasian PW, Cruikshank KA, Mayer RE, Pintrich PR, et al. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, N.Y.: Longman; 2001.
Schussler DL, Stooksberry LM, Bercaw LA. Understanding teacher candidate dispositions: reflecting to build self-awareness. J Teach Educ. 2010;61(4):350–63.
Underhill A. The role of groups in developing teacher self-awareness. ELT J. 1992;46(1):71–80.
Sutkin G, Wagner E, Harris I, Schiffer R. What makes a good clinical teacher in medicine? A review of the literature. Acad Med. 2008;83(5):452–66.
Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
Shea P, Li CS, Pickett A. A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. Internet High Educ. 2006;9:175–90.
Garrison DR, Andersen AR, Archer SL. The Community of Inquiry framework ten years later. Internet High Educ. 2010;13:1–2.
Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Internet High Educ. 2000;2:87–105.
Zilka GC, Cohen R, Rahimi ID. Teacher presence and social presence in virtual and blended courses. JITE: Res. 2018;17:103–26.
Swan K, Shih LF. On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. JALN. 2005;9(3):115–36.
Richardson J, Swan K, Lowenthal P, Ice P. Social presence in online learning: past, present and future. In Proceedings of Global Learn-Global Conference on Learning and Technology. 2016;Limerick, Ireland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)( Retrieved July 21, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/172799/.):477-83.
Cobb S. Social presence and online learning: a current view from a research perspective. J Interact Online Learn. 2009;8(3):241–54.
Richardson J, Swan K. Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction JALN. 2003;7(1):68–88.
Garrison DR, Anderson T. E-learning in the 21st century: a framework for research and practice. Third edition ed. New York: Routledge; 2003.
Sharples JM, Oxman AD, Mahtani KR, Chalmers I, Oliver S, Collins K, et al. Critical thinking in healthcare and education. BMJ. 2017;357:j2234.
Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. Am J Dist Learn. 2001;15(1):7–23.
Shea P, Bidjerano T. Learning presence: towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a Communities of Inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Comput Educ. 2010;55(4):1721–31.
Lim CP. Engaging learners in online learning environments. Tech Trends. 2004;48(4):16–23.
Schmidt H, Rikers R. How expertise develops in medicine: knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Med Educ. 2007a;41:1133–9.
Mar RA, Oatley K. The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008;3(3):173–92.
Norman GR, Monteiro SD, Sherbino J, Ilgen JS, Schmidt HG, Mamede S. The causes of errors in clinical reasoning: cognitive biases, knowledge deficits, and dual process thinking. Acad Med. 2017;92(1):23–30.
Malau-Aduli BS, Alele FO, Heggarty P, Teague PA, Sen Gupta T, Hays R. Perceived clinical relevance and retention of basic sciences across the medical education continuum. Adv Physiol Educ. 2019;43(3):293–9.
Guimaraes B, Dourado L, Tsisar S, Diniz JM, Madeira MD, Ferreira MA. Rethinking anatomy: how to overcome challenges of medical education’s evolution. Acta Med Port. 2017;30(2):134–40.
Schmidt HG, Rikers RM. How expertise develops in medicine: knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Med Educ. 2007b;41(12):1133–9.
Pashler H, Bain P, Bottge B, Graesser A, Koedinger K, McDaniel M, Metcalfe J. Organizing instruction and study to improve student learning (NCER 2007–2004). IES Practice Guide. 2007; National Center for Education Research, Institute of Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved January 11, 2021 from http://ncer.ed.gov.
Cepeda NJ, Pashler H, Vul E, Wixted JT, Rohrer D. Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: a review and qualitative synthesis. Psych Bul. 2006;132(6):354–80.
Agarwal PK, Karpicke JD, Kang SHK, Roediger HL, McDermott KB. Examining the testing effect with open- and closed-book tests Appl Cogn Psychol. 2008;22(7):861–76.
Blunt JR, Karpicke JD. Learning with retrieval-based concept mapping J Educ Psych. 2014;106(3):849–58.
Novak JD. Clarify with concept maps: a tool for students and teachers alike. Sci Teach. 1991;58:45–9.
Flaherty C. Zoom boom. Inside Higher Ed. 2020;April 29(Accessed January 5 2021 from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/04/29/synchronous-instruction-hot-right-now-it-sustainable).
Hrastinski S. Asynchronous & synchronous e-learning: a student of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning methods discovered that each supports different purposes. Educause Quarterly. 2008;4:51–5.
Giesbers B, Rienties B, Tempelaar D, Gijselaers W. A dynamic analysis of the interplay between asynchronous and synchronous communication in online learning: the impact of motivation. J Comput Assist Learn. 2013;30:30–50.
Gillis A, Krull LM. COVID-19 remote learning transition in Spring 2020: class structures, student perceptions, and inequality in college courses. Teach Sociol. 2020;48(4):283–99.
Lee J. A neuropsychological exploration of Zoom fatigue. Psychiatric Times Accessed January 8 2021 from https://www.psychiatrictimescom/view/psychological-exploration-zoom-fatigue. 2020;November 17.
Schoenbach R, Greenleaf C, Murphy L. Reading for understanding: how reading apprenticeship improves disciplinary learning in secondary and college classrooms. 2nd Edition ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
Meyer JHF, Land R, Baillie C. Threshold concepts and transformational learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2010.
Eva KW, Hatala RM, Leblanc VR, Brooks LR. Teaching from the clinical reasoning literature: combined reasoning strategies help novice diagnosticians overcome misleading information. Med Educ. 2007;41(12):1152–8.
ten Cate O, Durning SJ. Understanding clinical reasoning from multiple perspectives: a conceptual and theoretical overview. In: ten Cate O, Durning SJ, editors. Principles and Practice of Case-based Clinical Reasoning Education Innovation and Change in Professional Education. Springer: Cham; 2018. p. 35–46.
Siddaiah-Subramanya M, Nyandowe M, Zubair O. Self-regulated learning: why is it important compared to traditional learning in medical education? Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8:243–6.
van Houten-Schat MA, Berkhout JJ, van Dijk N, Endedijk MD, Jaarsma ADC, Diemers AD. Self-regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2018;52(10):1008–15.
Lajoie SP, Gube M. Adaptive expertise in medical education: accelerating learning trajectories by fostering self-regulated learning. Med Teach. 2018;40(8):809–12.
Regan L, Hopson LR, Gisondi MA, Branzetti J. Learning to learn: a qualitative study to uncover strategies used by Master Adaptive Learners in the planning of learning. Med Teach. 2019;41(11):1252–62.
Rothstein D, Santana L. Make just one change: teach students to ask their own questions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press; 2011.
Simpkin AL, Schwartzstein RM. Tolerating uncertainty - the next medical revolution? NEJM. 2016;375(18):1713–5.
Carraccio CL, Englander R. From Flexner to competencies: reflections on a decade and the journey ahead. Acad Med. 2013;88(8):1067–73.
Adair D, Shattuck K. Quality Matters: an educational input in an ongoing design-based research project. Amer J Dist Educ. 2015;29(3):159–65.
Brown PC, Roediger HL, MacDaniel MA. Make it stick: the science of successful learning. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard; 2014.
Hattikudur S, Postle BR. Effects of test-enhanced learning in a cognitive psychology course. J Behavand Neurosci Res. 2011;9:151–7.
Swan Sein A, Rashid H, Meka J, Amiel J, Pluta W. Twelve tips for embedding assessment for and as learning practices in a programmatic assessment system. Med Teach. 2020:1–7.
Agarwal PK, Bain PM, Chamberlain RW. The value of applied research: retrieval practice improves classroom learning and recommendations from a teacher, a principal, and a scientist. Educ Psych Rev. 2012;24(3):437–48.
Karpicke JD, Roediger HL 3rd. The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science. 2008;319(5865):966–8.
Blouin D, Tekian A. Accreditation of medical education programs: moving from student outcomes to continuous quality improvement measures. Acad Med. 2018;93(3):377–83.
Dittmar E, McCracken H. Promoting continuos quality improvement in online teaching: The META model. JALN. 2012;16:163–75.
Stratton TD. Legitimizing Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI): navigating rationality in undergraduate medical education. J Gen Int Med. 2019;34(5):758–61.
Wong BM, Headrick LA. Application of continuous quality improvement to medical education. Med Educ. 2021;55(1):72–81.
Sargeant J, Wong BM, Campbell CM. CPD of the future: a partnership between quality improvement and competency-based education. Med Educ. 2018;52(1):125–35.
Wong BM, Baum KD, Headrick LA, Holmboe ES, Moss F, Ogrinc G, et al. Building the bridge to quality: An urgent call to integrate quality improvement and patient safety education with clinical care. Acad Med. 2020;95(1):59–68.
Wilcha RJ. Effectiveness of virtual medical teaching during the COVID-19 crisis: systematic review. JMIR Med Educ. 2020;6(2):e20963.
Chick RC, Clifton GT, Peace KM, Propper BW, Hale DF, Alseidi AA, et al. Using technology to maintain the education of residents during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Surg Educ. 2020;77(4):729–32.
Kakadia R, Chen E, Ohyama H. Implementing an online OSCE during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Dent Educ. 2020.
Chen C, White L, Kowalewski T, Aggarwal R, Lintott C, Comstock B, et al. Crowd-sourced assessment of technical skills: a novel method to evaluate surgical performance. J Surg Res. 2014;187(1):65–71.
Wijesooriya NR, Mishra V, Brand PLP, Rubin BK. COVID-19 and telehealth, education, and research adaptations. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020;35:38–42.
Jumreornvong O, Yang E, Race J, Appel J. Telemedicine and medical education in the age of COVID-19. Acad Med. 2020;95(12):1838–43.
Baker DL. Designing and orchestrating online discussions. JOLT. 2011;7(3):401–11.
Harrington R, Loffredo DA. MBTI personality type and other factors that relate to preference for online versus face-to-face instruction. Internet High Educ. 2010;13:89–95.