Mindful Judgment and Decision Making
Tóm tắt
A full range of psychological processes has been put into play to explain judgment and choice phenomena. Complementing work on attention, information integration, and learning, decision research over the past 10 years has also examined the effects of goals, mental representation, and memory processes. In addition to deliberative processes, automatic processes have gotten closer attention, and the emotions revolution has put affective processes on a footing equal to cognitive ones. Psychological process models provide natural predictions about individual differences and lifespan changes and integrate across judgment and decision making (JDM) phenomena. “Mindful” JDM research leverages our knowledge about psychological processes into causal explanations for important judgment and choice regularities, emphasizing the adaptive use of an abundance of processing alternatives. Such explanations supplement and support existing mathematical descriptions of phenomena such as loss aversion or hyperbolic discounting. Unlike such descriptions, they also provide entry points for interventions designed to help people overcome judgments or choices considered undesirable.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderson MC, 1996, Memory
Cesarini D, Dawes C, Johannesson M, Lichtenstein P, Wallace B. 2007. Genetic influences on economic preferences.Work. Pap. Ser. Econ. Finance, No. 679, Stockholm School Econ.
Ellsworth P, 2003, Handbook of Affective Sciences, 572
Figner B, Mackinlay RJ, Wilkening F, Weber EU. 2008. Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task.J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn.Under review
Furlong EE, Opfer JE. 2008. Cognitive constraints on how economic rewards affect cooperation.Psychol. Sci.In press
Gaechter S, 2007, Inst. Study Labor Discuss. Pap. 2961
Gelman A, 2007, Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
Gul F, 2005, The Case for Mindless Economics
Hammond KR, 1996, Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice, 10.1093/oso/9780195097344.001.0001
Kahneman D, 1973, Attention and Effort
Kahneman D, 2003, Les Prix Nobel: the Nobel Prizes 2002, 449
Krosnick JA, 2004, Rethinking the Vote: The Politics and Prospects of American Election Reform, 51
Loewenstein GF, 2007, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 59, 1
Luce RD, 2000, Utility of Gains and Losses: Measurement-Theoretical and Experimental Approaches.
Russo JE, Carlson KA, Meloy MG. 2008. Choose an inferior alternative.Psychol. Sci.In press
Shafir E, 2008, The Behavioral Foundations of Policy
Simon HA, 1957, Models of Man: Social and Rational; Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in Society Setting
Simon HA, 1978, Am. Econ. Rev., 68, 1
Tetlock PE., 2005, Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?
Thaler RH, 2008, Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness
Wansink B, 2006, Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More Than We Think
Weber EU, 2008, Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain, 127
Zauberman G, Kim BK, Malkoc SA, Bettman J. 2008. Discounting time and time discounting: subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences.J. Mark. Res.In press