Mindful Judgment and Decision Making

Annual Review of Psychology - Tập 60 Số 1 - Trang 53-85 - 2009
Elke U. Weber1, Eric J. Johnson1
1Center for the Decision Sciences (CDS), Columbia University, New York, New York 10027;

Tóm tắt

A full range of psychological processes has been put into play to explain judgment and choice phenomena. Complementing work on attention, information integration, and learning, decision research over the past 10 years has also examined the effects of goals, mental representation, and memory processes. In addition to deliberative processes, automatic processes have gotten closer attention, and the emotions revolution has put affective processes on a footing equal to cognitive ones. Psychological process models provide natural predictions about individual differences and lifespan changes and integrate across judgment and decision making (JDM) phenomena. “Mindful” JDM research leverages our knowledge about psychological processes into causal explanations for important judgment and choice regularities, emphasizing the adaptive use of an abundance of processing alternatives. Such explanations supplement and support existing mathematical descriptions of phenomena such as loss aversion or hyperbolic discounting. Unlike such descriptions, they also provide entry points for interventions designed to help people overcome judgments or choices considered undesirable.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/0146167203261890

Anderson MC, 1996, Memory

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01956.x

10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.524

10.1162/00335530360535153

10.1257/089533005774357897

10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00510-1

10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.03.003

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01843.x

10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3

10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.107

10.2307/1422211

10.1007/s11166-005-5103-9

10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.253

10.1287/mnsc.1060.0592

10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.009

10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.409

10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.611

10.3758/BF03194118

10.1016/S0165-4896(02)00016-1

10.1037/1040-3590.14.3.253

10.1037//0033-295X.100.3.432

10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367

10.1006/jmps.1998.1217

10.1086/317590

10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00348.x

Cesarini D, Dawes C, Johannesson M, Lichtenstein P, Wallace B. 2007. Genetic influences on economic preferences.Work. Pap. Ser. Econ. Finance, No. 679, Stockholm School Econ.

10.1086/425091

10.1006/obhd.1999.2841

10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00508-3

10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.310

10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00057-8

10.1111/1467-8721.00203

10.1177/0146167207303948

10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.938

10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.008

10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.177

10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.586

10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.180

10.3758/BF03196449

10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.262

Ellsworth P, 2003, Handbook of Affective Sciences, 572

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01856.x

10.1111/1467-9280.00372

10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.280

10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.912

10.1007/s11166-008-9035-z

10.1287/mnsc.1050.0490

10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.797

10.1037/0033-295X.107.4.659

Figner B, Mackinlay RJ, Wilkening F, Weber EU. 2008. Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task.J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn.Under review

10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S

10.1287/mnsc.45.8.1057

10.1257/089533005775196732

10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.184

Furlong EE, Opfer JE. 2008. Cognitive constraints on how economic rewards affect cooperation.Psychol. Sci.In press

Gaechter S, 2007, Inst. Study Labor Discuss. Pap. 2961

Gelman A, 2007, Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models

10.7182/prtr.13.1.e6w229973t37141g

10.1257/aer.97.2.142

10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.75

10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.137

10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.942

Gul F, 2005, The Case for Mindless Economics

Hammond KR, 1996, Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice, 10.1093/oso/9780195097344.001.0001

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01702.x

10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.653

10.1006/cogp.1998.0708

10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00715.x

10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00366.x

10.1037/1076-898X.9.4.249

10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.733

10.1037/0096-3445.128.1.3

10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.23

10.1037/0096-3445.126.1.45

10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.680

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01677.x

10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01740.x

10.2307/20111864

10.1126/science.1091721

10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.461

10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.263

10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.841

10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.678

Kahneman D, 1973, Attention and Effort

10.1017/CBO9780511803475.038

Kahneman D, 2003, Les Prix Nobel: the Nobel Prizes 2002, 449

Kahneman D, Tversky A. 2000.Choices, Values, and Frames. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01760.x

10.7551/mitpress/9780262195805.003.0011

Krantz DH, 2007, Judgment Decis. Making, 2, 137, 10.1017/S1930297500000826

Krosnick JA, 2004, Rethinking the Vote: The Politics and Prospects of American Election Reform, 51

10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.880

10.1162/003355397555253

10.3758/BF03196581

10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75

10.1111/1467-9280.01433

10.1037//0022-3514.81.1.146

10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00679.x

10.1037//0033-2909.125.2.255

10.1006/obhd.2001.2983

10.1017/CBO9780511618031

Loewenstein GF, 2007, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 59, 1

10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267

10.1006/jmps.1999.1259

10.1006/obhd.1999.2872

Luce RD, 2000, Utility of Gains and Losses: Measurement-Theoretical and Experimental Approaches.

10.1162/003355301753265543

10.1086/341573

10.1111/1467-9280.01455

10.1126/science.1100907

10.3758/BF03196520

10.1111/1467-9280.00350

10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.447

10.1037//0096-3445.128.3.332

10.1006/obhd.2001.2954

10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.923

10.1080/1366987032000123856

10.1509/jmkr.44.3.347

10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00141-0

10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.983

10.1002/bdm.481

10.1007/s11166-005-5831-x

10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000511

10.1002/9780470752937.ch6

10.1002/bdm.528

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x

10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.167

10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085516

10.3758/BF03193973

10.1023/A:1011198414683

10.1023/A:1007879411489

10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.01.002

10.1006/obhd.2000.2948

10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00275.x

10.1111/1539-6924.00332

10.1017/CBO9780511609978.009

10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.150

10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.274

10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.207

10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.370

Russo JE, Carlson KA, Meloy MG. 2008. Choose an inferior alternative.Psychol. Sci.In press

10.1287/mnsc.46.1.13.15127

10.1017/CBO9780511609978

10.1207/s15516709cog2703_8

10.1037/0033-295X.112.3.610

10.1017/S1357530902000558

10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1178

10.1080/026999300402745

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01958.x

Shafir E, 2008, The Behavioral Foundations of Policy

10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135213

10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.207

10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422

10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00678.x

Simon HA, 1957, Models of Man: Social and Rational; Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in Society Setting

Simon HA, 1978, Am. Econ. Rev., 68, 1

10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3

10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00439.x

10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.003

10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.23

10.3758/BF03196629

10.1017/CBO9780511609978.011

10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.451

Tetlock PE., 2005, Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?

10.1111/1467-9280.00418

10.1086/380085

Thaler RH, 2008, Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01816.x

10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403

10.1007/BF00122574

10.1037//0033-295X.101.4.547

10.4135/9781412952552.n228

10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.757

10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.006

10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.862

Wansink B, 2006, Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More Than We Think

10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.01.001

10.1111/j.1740-8784.2004.00005.x

10.1002/bdm.414

10.1287/mnsc.44.9.1205

Weber EU, 2008, Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain, 127

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01932.x

10.1023/A:1007769703493

10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.430

10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00627.x

10.1098/rsbl.2003.0134

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01646.x

Zauberman G, Kim BK, Malkoc SA, Bettman J. 2008. Discounting time and time discounting: subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences.J. Mark. Res.In press

10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.23

10.1111/1467-6494.00124

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Annual Review of Psychology

Tập 60 Số 1

53-85

Thông tin tác giả