Mid-term results of Miller−Galante unicompartmental knee replacement for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology - Tập 17 - Trang 199-206 - 2015
Hemanth Kumar Venkatesh1, S. S. Maheswaran2
1Department of Orthopedics, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospital, Basildon, UK
2Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital of North Tees & Hartlepool, Stockton On Tees, UK

Tóm tắt

The purpose of this study is to analyse and report the mid-term results of 175 unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) procedures performed for medial compartment knee arthritis from January 2001 to January 2010. The cohort participants were selected after stringent inclusion criteria and the average follow-up was 5.6 years (range 2–10 years). The fixed-bearing UKR procedure was carried out on all patients. The pre-operative mean knee range of movement improved from 100° ± 11.3° to 118.3° ± 12° (p value <0.001). The pre-operative mean Knee Society (KS) knee and functional score improved from 47 ± 5.5 and 55.1 ± 4.6 to 91.8 ± 9.2 and 92 ± 10.1 (p value <0.001), respectively. The revision rate of the cohort was 4 % (seven knees) and implant survival rate was 96 % at the end of 10 years; 87 % of the cohort were satisfied with the procedure and had a normal gait pattern. In this study, there was no statistical difference between groups with a body mass index (BMI) ≤30 kg/m2 and those with a BMI ≥30 kg/m2, and between groups aged ≤55 years and those aged ≥55 years, in clinical and functional outcome following UKR. This study confirms that fixed-bearing UKR gives excellent results in patients with medial compartment knee arthritis who comply with the inclusion criteria. Age and BMI were not considered to influence the clinical and functional outcomes. Level of evidence-III.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Peat G, Mc carney R, Croftt P (2001) Knee pain and osteoarthritis in older adults; a review of community burden and current use of health care. Ann Rheum Dis 60:91–97 Hootman JM, Helmick CG (2006) Projections of US prevalence of arthritis and associated activities limitations. Arthritis Rheum 54(1):226–229 American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Osteoarthritis Guidelines (2000) Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Arthritis Rheum 43:1905–1915 Ahlback S (1968) Osteoarthrosis of the knee: a radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) Suppl 277:7–72 Fisher N, Agarwal M, Reuben SF, Johnson DS, Turner PG (2006) Sporting and physical activity following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 13(4):296–300 Price AJ, Waite JC, Svard UC (2005) Long term clinical results of the medial oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 435:171–180 Bedson J, Jordon K, Croft P (2004) The prevalence and history of knee osteoarthritis in general practice: a case-control study. Fam Pract 21:1–6 Murray DV, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a 10-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80-B:983–989 Bert JM (2005) Unicompartmental knee replacement. Orthop Clin N Am 36(4):513–522 Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD (1991) Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop 273:151–156 Svard UCG, Price AJ (2001) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(2):191–194 Tanavalee A, Choi YJ, Tria AJ Jr (2005) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty: past and present. Orthopedics 28(12):1423–1433 Ackroyd CE, Whitehouse SL, Newman JH, Joslin CC (2002) A comparative study of the medial St Georg sled and kinematic total knee arthroplasties. Ten-year survivorship. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84-B:667–672 Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ et al (2005) Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of 10 years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:999–1006 BrennerSmith At, Ewings P, Weale AE (2004) Knee scores in a normal elderly population. Knee 11:279–282 Rougraff BT, Heck DA, Gibson AE (1991) A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop 273:157–164 Jonsson GT (1981) Compartmental arthroplasty for gonarthrosis. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 193 Goodfellow Hungerford DS, Zindel M (1976) Patella-femoral joint mechanics and pathology. 1. Functional anatomy of the patella-femoral joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 58B:287–290 Beard DJ, Pandit H, Ostlere S, Jenkins C, Dodd CAF, Murray DW (2007) Pre-operative clinical and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint in unicompartmental knee replacement and its influence on outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89-B:1602–1607 Sundberg M, Lidgren L, Knutson K, Robertson O. Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 2011 annual report. http://www.myknee.se/en Lewold S, Goodman S, Knutson K, Robertson O, Lidgren I (1995) Oxford meniscal bearing knee versus the Marmor knee in unicompartmental arthroplasty for arthrosis. A Swedish multicentre survival study. J Arthroplasty 10:722–731 Argenson Jn, O’Connor JJ (1992) Polyethylene wear in meniscal knee replacement. A one to nine-year retrieval analysis of the Oxford knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:228–232 Psychoylos V, Crawford RW, O’Connor JJ, Murray DW (1998) Wear of congruent meniscal bearings in unicompartmental knee replacement: a retrieval study of 16 specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:976–982 Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, Sheinkop MM, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO (1999) Unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to10-year follow up. Clin Orthop 367:50–60 Squire MW, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC (1999) Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15 year follow up study. Clin Orthop 367:61–72 Voss F, Sheinkop MB, Galante JO, Barden RM, Rosenberg AG (1995) Miller-Galante unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 2- to 5-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 10(6):764–770 Foran JR, Mont MA, Rajadhyaksha AD (2004) Total knee arthroplasty in obese patients: a comparison with a matched control group. J Arthroplasty 19:817 Winiarsky R, Barth P, Lotke P (1998) Total knee arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1770 Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH (2005) Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:60 Heck DA, Marmor L, Gibson A (1993) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A multicentre investigation with long term follow up evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:154 Tabor OB Jr, Tabor OB, Bernard M (2005) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long term success in middle age and obese patients. J Surg Orthop Adv 14:59 Kuipers BM, Kollen BJ, Kaijser Bots PC (2010) Factors associated with reduced early survival in the Oxford phase III medial unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 17:48 Peter MB, Maria SG, Micael GZ, Harpal SK, Aaron JJ, Michael AM (2011) Outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty stratified by body mass index. J Arthroplasty 26(8):1149–1153 Lidgren L, Knutson K, Robertson O. Swedish Knee arthroplasty register 2004 annual report. www.myknee.se/en Argenson JN, Chevrol-Bankeddache Y, Aubaniac JM (2002) Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to 10-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:2235–2239 Price AJ, Dodd CA, Svard UCG, Murray DW (2005) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(11):1488–1492 Pennington DW, Swienchowski JJ, Lutes WB, Drake GN (2003) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients 60 years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1968–1973 Parratte S, Argenson JNA, Pearce O, Pauly V, Auquier P, Aubaniac JM (2009) Medial unicompartmental knee replacement in the under-50 s. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 B:351–356 Hanssen AD, Stuart MJ, Scott RD, Scuderi GR (2001) Surgical options for the middle aged patient with osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Instr Course Lect 50:499–511 Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Sheinkop MB, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO (2004) The progression of patellofemoral arthrosis after medial unicompartmental replacement: results at 11 to 15 years. Clin Orthop Rel Res 428:92–99 Weale AE, Newman JH (1994) Unicompartmental arthroplasty and high tibia osteotomy for osteoarthrosis of the knee: a comparative study with a 12- to 17-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop 302:134–137