Microsatellite determination of male reproductive success in a natural population of the territorial ornate dragon lizard, Ctenophorus ornatus

Molecular Ecology - Tập 10 Số 1 - Trang 193-203 - 2001
Natasha R. LeBas1
1Department of Zoology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia

Tóm tắt

Abstract

It is now evident that the genetic mating system can be very different to the observed mating system. However, it is less well known what makes particular individuals more (or less) successful than expected from the observed system. In this study the observed territorial structure of a field population of the agamid lizard, Ctenophorus ornatus, was compared with the mating system as evidenced by microsatellite parentage assignment. This study also investigated whether any male traits predicted reproductive success. Sixty‐five per cent of clutches were sired at least partially by a male other than the main territory‐holding male and 35% of clutches were sired by a male with no overlap of the female’s territory. Multiple paternity was moderately frequent at 25% of clutches. Male chest patch size predicted territory size and the number of females in the territory, but did not predict reproductive success. Instead, male head depth and body size were independently related to the number of offspring sired. As male head depth also predicted the number of females in a territory, these males are likely to be gaining increased reproductive success as a consequence of the higher number of females in their territories. Larger body size males, however, did not have a greater number of females in their territory and instead had more extra‐territorial copulations. Whether these extra‐territorial copulations are due to female choice or success in male competition is unknown.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1007/s002650050382

10.1073/pnas.93.12.5797

10.1098/rspb.1993.0066

10.1007/BF00318265

10.1515/9780691207278

10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01442.x

10.1111/j.1095-8312.1993.tb00933.x

BradshawSD(1965)The Comparative Ecology of Lizards of the Genus Amphibolurus.PhD Thesis.University of Western Australia Perth.

10.1007/s002650050515

10.1111/j.1469-7998.1996.tb05302.x

10.1007/s002650050336

Clutton‐Brock TH, 1988, Reproductive Success: Studies of Individual Variation in Contrasting Breeding Systems

10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00683.x

10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00373.x

10.1006/anbe.1993.1083

10.1086/283163

10.1007/BF00170171

10.1007/BF00170172

10.1098/rspb.1997.0177

10.1126/science.250.4986.1394

10.1046/j.1365-294X.1997.t01-1-00156.x

10.1038/381229a0

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb04302.x

10.1006/anbe.1993.1189

10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0383:IMTWFM]2.0.CO;2

10.1038/357494a0

10.1086/284275

LeBasNR(2000)Sexual selection and the mating system of the ornate dragon lizard Ctenophorus ornatus.PhD Thesis University of Western Australia Perth.

10.1098/rspb.2000.1020

10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00874.x

10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x

10.1086/285531

10.1016/0003-3472(92)90046-C

10.1006/anbe.1994.1280

10.1016/B978-012100543-6/50038-6

Pemberton JM, 1992, Behavioural estimates of male mating success tested by DNA fingerprinting in a polygynous mammal, Behavioral Ecology, 3, 66, 10.1093/beheco/3.1.66

10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01513-4

Sambrook J, 1989, Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual

Stamps JA, 1977, Biology of the Reptilia, 265

10.4159/harvard.9780674183384.c11

10.2307/2531997

10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80120-4

Vitt LJ, 1985, The evolution of sexual dimorphism in the skink Eumeces laticeps: an example of sexual selection, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 67, 68

10.2307/3677042

10.1098/rspb.1997.0075

Zar JH, 1984, Biostatistical Analysis