Methods for Assessing Single-Case School-Based Intervention Outcomes

Baer, D. M. (1977). Perhaps it would be better not to know everything. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 167–172.

Brossart, D. F., Parker, R. I., Olson, E. A., & Mahadevan, L. (2006). The relationship between visual analysis and five statistical analyses in a simple AB single-case research design. Behavior Modification, 30, 531–563.

Brossart, D. F., Parker, R. I., & Castillo, L. G. (2011). Robust regression for single-case data analysis: How can it help? Behavior Research Methods, 43, 710–719.

Busk, P. L., & Marascuilo, L. A. (1992). Statistical analysis in single-case research: Issues, procedures, and recommendations, with applications to multiple behaviors. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 159–186). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Busk, P. L., & Serlin, R. C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 187–212). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Busse, R. T. (2005). Methods for assessing response to intervention. Atlanta: Workshop presented at the annual convention of the National Association of School Psychologists.

Busse, R. T., & Yi, M. (2013). Behavioral and academic rating scale applications within the problem-solving model. In R. Brown-Chidsey & A. Andren (Eds.), Assessment for intervention: a problem-solving approach (2nd ed., pp. 180–198). New York: Guilford.

Busse, R. T., Kratochwill, T. R., & Elliott, S. N. (1995). Meta-analysis for single-case consultation outcomes: Applications to research and practice. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 269–285.

Busse, R. T., Elliott, S. N., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1999). Influences of verbal interactions during behavioral consultations on treatment outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 117–143.

Busse, R. T., Elliott, S. N., & Kratochwill, T. K. (2010). Convergent evidence scaling for multiple assessment indicators: Conceptual issues, application, and technical challenges. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 26, 149–161.

Christ, T. J., Zopluoglu, C., Long, J. D., & Monaghen, B. D. (2012). Curriculum-based measurement of oral-reading: Quality of progress monitoring outcomes. Exceptional Children, 78, 356–373.

Coffee, G., & Ray-Subramanian, C. (2009). Goal attainment scaling: a progress-monitoring tool for behavioral interventions. School Psychology Forum, 3, 1–12.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.

DeProspero, A., & Cohen, S. (1979). Inconsistent visual analyses of intrasubject data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 573–579.

Elliott, S. N., & Busse, R. T. (2004). Assessment and evaluation of students’ behavior and intervention outcomes: the utility of rating scale methods. In R. B. Rutherford, M. M. Quinn, & S. R. Mathur (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 123–142). New York: Guilford.

Gingerich, W. J. (1984). Meta-analysis of applied time-series data. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20, 71–79.

Gorman-Smith, D., & Matson, J. L. (1985). A review of treatment research for self-injurious and stereotyped responding. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 29, 295–308.

Gresham, F. M. (1989). Assessment of intervention integrity in school consultation and prereferral interventions. School Psychology Review, 18, 37–50.

Hageman, W. J., & Arrindell, W. A. (1999). Establishing clinically significant change: Increment of precision and the distinction between individual and group level of analysis. Behavior Research and Therapy, 37, 1169–1193.

Hasbrouk, J. E., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: a valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59, 636–644.

Hixson, M., Christ, T. J., & Bradley-Johnson, S. (2008). Best practices in the analysis of progress monitoring data and decision making. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 2133–2146). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.

Hsu, L. M. (1989). Reliable changes in psychotherapy: Taking into account regression toward the mean. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 459–467.

Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.

Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., & Revenstorf, D. (1984). Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behavior Therapy, 15, 336–352.

Kennedy, C. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Kiresuk, T. J., & Sherman, R. E. (1968). Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 4, 443–453.

Kiresuk, T. J., Smith, A., & Cardillo, J. E. (Eds.). (1994). Goal attainment scaling: Application, theory, and measurement. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Knapp, T. J. (1983). Behavior analysts’ visual appraisal of behavior change in graphic display. Behavioral Assessment, 5, 155–164.

Kratochwill, T. R., & Stoiber, K. C. (2002). Empirically supported interventions and school psychology: Conceptual and practice issues: Part II. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 233–253.

Lunnen, K. M., & Ogles, B. M. (1998). A multiperspective, multivariable evaluation of reliable change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 400–410.

McGill, R. J., & Busse, R. T. (2014). An evaluation of multiple single-case outcome indicators using convergent evidence scaling. Contemporary School Psychology, 18, 13–23.

Michael, J. (1974). Statistical inference for individual organism research: Mixed blessing or curse? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 647–653.

Parker, R. I., & Vannest, K. J. (2008). An improved effect size for single-case research: nonoverlap of all pairs. Behavior Therapy, 40, 95–105.

Parker, R. I., Hagan-Burke, S., & Vannest, K. J. (2007). Percentage of all non-overlapping data (PAND): an alternative to PND. The Journal of Special Education, 40, 194–204.

Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–99.

Parsonson, B. S. (2003). Visual analysis of graphs: Seeing is believing. In K. S. Budd & T. Stokes (Eds.), A small matter of proof: the legacy of Donald M. Baer (pp. 35–52). Reno: Context Press.

Parsonson, B. S., & Baer, D.M. (1986). The graphic analysis of data. In A. Poling & R.W. Fuqua (Eds.), Research methods in applied behavior analysis: Issues and advances (pp. 157–186). New York: Plenum.

Riley-Tillman, T. C., & Burns, M. K. (2009). Evaluating educational interventions: Single-case design for measuring response to intervention. New York: Guilford.

Roach, A. T., & Elliott, S. N. (2005). Goal attainment scaling: an efficient and effective approach to monitoring student progress. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37(4), 8–17.

Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–33.

Shinn, M., Good, R., & Stein, S. (1989). Summarizing trend in student achievement: a comparison of methods. School Psychology Review, 18, 356–370.

Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist, 32, 752–760.

Tingey, R. C., Lambert, M. L., Burlingame, G. M., & Hansen, N. B. (1996). Assessing clinical significance: Proposed extensions to the method. Psychotherapy Research, 6, 109–103.

White, O. R. (1987). Some comments concerning “The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research.”. Remedial and Special Education, 11, 203–214.