Methodological issues in developing a multi-dimensional coding procedure for small-group chat communication

Learning and Instruction - Tập 17 - Trang 394-404 - 2007
Jan-Willem Strijbos1, Gerry Stahl2
1Leiden University, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Centre for the Study of Learning and Instruction, Section for Educational Studies, Department of Pedagogical Sciences, Wassenaarseweg 52, P.O. Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands
2Drexel University, College of Information Science and Technology, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

2003 Artstein, R., & Poesio, M. (2005). Kappa3 = alpha (or beta) (NLE Technical Note 05–1). University of Essex: Natural Language Engineering and Web Applications Group. Barron, 2003, When smart groups fail, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307, 10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1 Beers, 2005, Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments, Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 623, 10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.036 Cakir, M., Xhafa, F., Zhou, N., & Stahl, G. (2005, July). Thread-based analysis of patterns of collaborative interaction in chat. Paper presented at the 12th international conference on artificial intelligence in education, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Chi, 1997, Quantifying qualitative analysis of verbal data: a practical guide, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271, 10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1 Chiu, 2003, Rudeness and status effects during group problem solving: do they bias evaluations and reduce the likelihood of correct solutions?, Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 506, 10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.506 De Wever, 2006, Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: a review, Computers & Education, 46, 6, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005 Fischer, 2002, Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools, Learning and Instruction, 12, 213, 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00005-6 Fischer, 2005, Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning: the role of external representation tools, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 405, 10.1207/s15327809jls1403_3 Fuks, 2006, R-U-Typing-2-Me? Evolving a chat tool to increase understanding in learning activities, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 117, 10.1007/s11412-006-6845-3 Gunawardena, 1997, Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 397, 10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG Henri, 1992, Computer conferencing and content analysis, 117 Hmelo-Silver, 2003, Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: multiple methods for integrated understanding, Computers & Education, 41, 397, 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.07.001 Hurme, 2005, Students’ activity in computer-supported collaborative problem solving in mathematics, International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 10, 49, 10.1007/s10758-005-4579-3 Jonassen, 2001, Communication patterns in computer mediated and face-to-face group problem solving, Educational Technology Research & Development, 49, 35, 10.1007/BF02504505 Krippendorff, 2004, Reliability in content analysis: some common misconceptions and recommendations, Human Communication Research, 30, 411, 10.1093/hcr/30.3.411 Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33, 159, 10.2307/2529310 Mercer, 1999, Is “exploratory talk” productive talk?, 79 Neuendorf, 2002 O'Neill, J., & Martin, D. (2003). Text chat in action. Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Groupware (GROUP 2003), Sanibel Island, FL, USA. Polya, 1985 Renninger, 2003, Mentor-participant exchange in the Ask Dr. Math service: Design and implementation considerations, 159 Riffe, 1998 Rourke, 2001, Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8 Schellens, 2005, Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: what about the impact on cognitive processing?, Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 957, 10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.025 Sfard, 2003, Analyzing tools: perspectives on the role of designed artifacts in mathematics learning (special issue), The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11 Stahl, 2002, Rediscovering CSCL, 169 Stahl, 2006 Stahl, G. (2006b). Virtual Math Teams project: An overview of VMT. Retrieved January 23, 2007, from: http://www.mathforum.org/vmt/researchers/orientation.html. Stahl, 2006, Sustaining group cognition in a math chat environment, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning (RPTEL), 1, 85, 10.1142/S1793206806000068 Stahl, 2006, Analyzing and designing the group cognitive experience, International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems (IJCIS), 15, 157, 10.1142/S0218843006001323 Stahl, 2006, Supporting group cognitions in an online math community: a cognitive tool for small-group text referencing in chat, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 103, 10.2190/Q435-7611-2561-720P Stahl, 2006, Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective, 409 Strijbos, J. W. (2004). The effect of roles on computer-supported collaborative learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Open University of The Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands. 2004 Strijbos, 2004, The effect of functional roles on perceived group efficiency: using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups, Small Group Research, 35, 195, 10.1177/1046496403260843 Strijbos, 2006, Content analysis: what are they talking about?, Computers & Education, 46, 29, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.002 Webb, 2003, The development of students’ helping behaviour and learning in peer-directed small groups, Cognition & Instruction, 21, 361, 10.1207/s1532690xci2104_2 Weinberger, 2006, A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning, Computers & Education, 46, 71, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003 Zemel, A., Xhafa, F., & Stahl, G. (2005, September). Analyzing the organization of collaborative math problem-solving in online chats using statistics and conversation analysis. Paper presented at CRIWIG 2005 conference, Recipe, Brazil.