Methodological evaluation and comparison of five urinary albumin measurements

Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis - Tập 25 Số 5 - Trang 324-329 - 2011
Rui Liu1, Gang Li1, Xiao‐Fan Cui2, D. Zhang2, Qing‐Hong Yang2, Xiao‐Yan Mu2, Wen‐Jie Pan2
1College of Precision Instrument and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China
2Department of Clinical Laboratory, Tianjin Union Medicine Centre, Tianjin, People's Republic of China

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Background: Microalbuminuria is an indicator of kidney damage and a risk factor for the progression kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and so on. Therefore, accurate and precise measurement of urinary albumin is critical. However, there are no reference measurement procedures and reference materials for urinary albumin. Methods: Nephelometry, turbidimetry, colloidal gold method, radioimmunoassay, and chemiluminescence immunoassay were performed for methodological evaluation, based on imprecision test, recovery rate, linearity, haemoglobin interference rate, and verified reference interval. Then we tested 40 urine samples from diabetic patients by each method, and compared the result between assays. Results: The results indicate that nephelometry is the method with best analytical performance among the five methods, with an average intraassay coefficient of variation (CV) of 2.6%, an average interassay CV of 1.7%, a mean recovery of 99.6%, a linearity of R=1.00 from 2 to 250 mg/l, and an interference rate of <10% at haemoglobin concentrations of <1.82 g/l. The correlation (r) between assays was from 0.701 to 0.982, and the Bland–Altman plots indicated each assay provided significantly different results from each other. Conclusion: Nephelometry is the clinical urinary albumin method with best analytical performance in our study. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 25:324–329, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ning T, 2008, Clinical significance of microalbuminuria, Pract Med Tech, 15, 4596

10.1373/clinchem.2008.106567

Mu XY, 2010, Current investigation of serum creatinine and urinary albumin measurement in 50 hospitals in Tianjin, Lab Med, 25, 468

10.1097/MNH.0b013e32833e4ce1

10.1161/01.HYP.0000154082.72286.2a

10.1159/000317524

10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f73638

Cheng SQ, 2006, Microalbuminuria in early diagnosis of diabetic renal injury, J Lab Med, 28, 740

10.1681/ASN.2010010063

10.2337/diacare.25.6.977

10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.07.029

10.1373/clinchem.2008.107508

10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.09219.x

10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2003.10.008

Gu XQ, 2004, Explore the immune turbidimetry assay urinary micro‐albumin, Mod Lab Med J, 19, 36

Wang YC, 1995, Comparison of microalbuminuria methods, J Clin Microbiol, 18, 266

Pan AP, 2003, Comparison and clinical application of microalbuminuria testing among Immunoturbidimetric assay and radioimmunoassay, Jingxi Med Lab Sci, 21, 26

Zhan BE, 2008, Clinical evaluation of ELISA and chemiluminescent immunoassay method on urinary albumin measurement, China Trop Med, 8, 2147

Bao LiM, 2006, Evaluation and clinical application of ELISA assay on urinary albumin measurement, Chin J Health Lab Technol, 16, 227

10.1373/clinchem.2008.115543

10.1373/clinchem.2009.129833

10.1016/S0009-8981(98)00021-7

Liu L, 2000, The primary study on interference mechanism of hemoglobin, bilirubin and lipohemia on automatic biochemical analyzer, Shan Xi Clin Med J, 9, 718

Piao JZ, 2003, Investigation of urinary micro‐albumin measurement, J Chenzhou Med Coll, 5, 31