Metaphysical foundationalism, heterarchical structure, and Huayan interdependence

Dushun 杜順. n.d. Cessation and contemplation in the five teachings of Huayan (Huayan wujiao zhiguan famen 華嚴五教止觀法門). T, volume 45, number 1867.

Fazang 法藏.n.d.-a Commentary on the Avataṃsaka Sūtra (Huayan jing zhigui 華嚴經旨歸). T, volume 45, number 1871.

Fazang 法藏.n.d.-b Treatise on the divisions within the one vehicle doctrine of Huayan (Huayan yicheng jiaoyi fenqi zhang 華嚴一乘教義分齊章). Also known as Treatise on the five teachings of Huayan (Huayan wujiao zhang 華嚴五教章). T, volume 45, number 1866.

Nāgārjuna. n.d.Commentary on the Great perfection of wisdom (Da zhidu lun 大智度論). Translated by Kumārajīva. T, volume 25, number 1509.

Śikṣānanda 實叉難陀. n.d. Buddhāvataṃsaka-sūtra (Dafangguang Fohuayan jing 大方廣佛華嚴經). Also known as Avataṃsaka Sūtra. T, volume 10, number 279.

Zhiyan 智儼. n.d. Ten mysterious gates of the unitary vehicle of Huayan (Huayan yicheng shixuan men 華嚴一乘十玄門). T, volume 45, number 1868.

Amijee, F. (2020). Principle of sufficient reason. In M. J. Raven (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of metaphysical grounding (pp. 63–75). Routledge.

Bernstein, S. (2021). Could a middle level be the most fundamental? Philosophical Studies, 178(4), 1065–1078.

Bliss, R. (forthcoming). Some work for a theory of grounding? In M. Roques (Ed.), Grounding in medieval philosophy: Brill.

Bliss, R., & Priest, G. (2018). Metaphysical dependence, east and west. In S. M. Emmanuel (Ed.), Buddhist philosophy: A comparative approach (pp. 63–85). John Wily & Sons.

Bohn, E. D. (2018). Divine foundationalism. Philosophy Compass, 13(10), e12524.

Bondarenko, D. M. (2007). Homoarchy as a principle of sociopolitical organization: An introduction. Anthropos, 102(1), 187–199.

Chödrön, G.K.M. (2001). The treatise on the great perfection of wisdom by Nāgārjuna (Mahāprajñāpāramitāśāstra). Karma Changchub Ling.

Cleary, T. (1983). Entry into the inconceivable: An introduction to Hua-yen Buddhism. University of Hawai’i Press.

Cleary, T. (1993). The flower ornament scripture: A translation of the Avatamsaka Sutra. Shambhala.

Cook, F. H. (1970). Fa-tsang’s treatise on the five doctrines: An annotated translation. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Wisconsin.

Crumley, C. L. (1979). Three locational models: An epistemological assessment for anthropology and archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 2, 141–173.

Duncan, M., Miller, K., & Norton, J. (2018). Ditching determinism and dependence: Or, how to wear the crazy trousers. Synthese, 128(1), 395–418.

Fine, K. (2005). Tense and reality. In Kit Fine, Modality and tense: Philosophical papers (pp. 261–320). Oxford University Press.

Gang, C. (2009). Hierarchy, form, and reality. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 4(3), 437–453.

Di Giacomo, F. (2021). Early theoretical chemistry: Plato’s chemistry in Timaeus. Foundations of Chemistry, 23, 17–30.

Hammond, J. L. (2015). The anarchism of Occupy Wall Street. Science & Society, 79(2), 288–313.

Ho, C.-h. (2014). The way of nonacquisition: Jizang’s philosophy of ontic indeterminacy. In C.-k. Lin & M. Radich (Eds.), A distant mirror: Articulating Indic ideas in sixth and seventh century Chinese Buddhism (pp. 397–418). Hamburg University Press.

Huseyinzadegan, D. (2018). Does Kant have an organic theory of state? In V. L. Waibel, M. Ruffing, & D. Wagner (Eds.), Natur und Fraheit (pp. 2557–2564). De Gruyter.

James, D. (2020). Social organisms: Hegel's organizational theory of social functions. In R. Hufendiek, D. James, & R. van Riel (Eds.), Social functions in philosophy: Metaphysical, normative, and methodological perspectives (pp. 219–246). Routledge.

Jones, N. (2018). The metaphysics of identity in Fazang’s Huayan Wujiao Zhang: The inexhaustible freedom of dependent origination. In Y. Wang & S. A. Wawrytko (Eds.), Dao companion to Chinese Buddhist philosophy (pp. 295–323). Springer.

Jones, N. (2022). Interpreting interdependence in Fazang’s metaphysics. The Journal of East Asian Philosophy, 2(1), 35–52.

Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the power of judgment, trans. Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (2004). Prolegomena to any future metaphysics, trans. Cambridge University Press.

Kopf, G. (2019). Emptiness, multiverses, and the conception of multi-entry philosophy. APA Newsletter/Asian and Asian-American Philosophers and Philosophies, 19(1), 34–36.

Kronen, J., & Tuttle, J. (2011). Composite substances as true wholes: Toward a modified Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika theory of composite substances. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 41(2), 289–316.

LaFave, K. (2018). The sound of ontology: Music as a model for metaphysics. Lexington Books.

Mahoney, E. P. (1982). Metaphysical foundations of the hierarchy of being according to some Late-Medieval and Renaissance philosophers. In P. Morewedge (Ed.), Philosophies of existence, ancient and medieval (pp. 165–257). New York: Fordham University Press.

Martin, J. D. (2015). Fundamental disputations: The philosophical debates that governed American physics, 1939-1993. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 45(5), 703–757.

McKenzie, K. (2022). Fundamentality and grounding. Cambridge University Press.

Minsky, M., & Papert, S. (1972). Artificial Intelligence Progress Report. In MIT Artificial Intelligence Memo No. 252. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Mitchell, S. D. (2020). Perspectives, representation, and integration. In M. Massimi & C. D. McCoy (Eds.), Understanding perspectivism: scientific challenges and methodological prospects (pp. 178–193). Routledge.

Morganti, M. (2014). Metaphysical infinitism and the regress of being. Metaphilosophy, 45(2), 232–244.

Morganti, M. (2018). From ontic structural realism to metaphysical coherentism. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 9(1), 1–20.

Oberle, T. (2022). Metaphysical foundationalism: Consensus and controversy. American Philosophical Quarterly, 59(1), 97–110.

Oppenheim, P., & Putnam, H. (1958). Unity of science as a working hypothesis. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2, 3–36.

Pennisi, E. (2014). Our egalitarian Eden. Science, 344(6186), 824–825.

Priest, G. (2018). Buddhist dependence. In R. Bliss & G. Priest (Eds.), Reality and its structure: Essays in fundamentality (pp. 126–139). Oxford University Press.

Rabin, G. O., & Rabern, B. (2016). Well founding grounding. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 45(4), 349–279.

Rothbard, M. S. (1978). Society without a state. Nomos, 19, 191–207.

Sahlins, M. D. (1958). Social stratification in Polynesia. University of Washington Press.

Schaffer, J. (2010). Monism: The priority of the whole. Philosophical Review, 119(1), 31–76.

Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106(6), 467–482.

Tahko, T. E. (2018). Fundamentality and ontological minimality. In R. Bliss & G. Priest (Eds.), Reality and its structure: Essays in fundamentality (pp. 237–253). Oxford University Press.

Thompson, N. (2016). Metaphysical interdependence. In M. Jago (Ed.), Reality making (pp. 38–56). Oxford University Press.

Valentino, L. (2021). The Heterarchy of occupational status: Evidence for diverse logics of prestige in the United States. Sociological Forum, 36(S1), 1395–1418.

Verdon, M. (1982). On the laws of physical and human nature: Hobbes' physical and social cosmologies. Journal of the History of Ideas, 43(4), 653–663.

Williams, P. M. (1981). On Abhidharma ontology. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 9(3), 227–257.

Ziporyn, B. (2021). Why Chinese Buddhist philosophy? Journal of Buddhist Philosophy, 3, 4–35.