Mendelian Randomization as an Approach to Assess Causality Using Observational Data
Tóm tắt
Mendelian randomization refers to an analytic approach to assess the causality of an observed association between a modifiable exposure or risk factor and a clinically relevant outcome. It presents a valuable tool, especially when randomized controlled trials to examine causality are not feasible and observational studies provide biased associations because of confounding or reverse causality. These issues are addressed by using genetic variants as instrumental variables for the tested exposure: the alleles of this exposure–associated genetic variant are randomly allocated and not subject to reverse causation. This, together with the wide availability of published genetic associations to screen for suitable genetic instrumental variables make Mendelian randomization a time- and cost-efficient approach and contribute to its increasing popularity for assessing and screening for potentially causal associations. An observed association between the genetic instrumental variable and the outcome supports the hypothesis that the exposure in question is causally related to the outcome. This review provides an overview of the Mendelian randomization method, addresses assumptions and implications, and includes illustrative examples. We also discuss special issues in nephrology, such as inverse risk factor associations in advanced disease, and outline opportunities to design Mendelian randomization studies around kidney function and disease.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Klungel, 2004, Methods to assess intended effects of drug treatment in observational studies are reviewed., J Clin Epidemiol, 57, 1223, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.03.011
Lawlor, 2008, Mendelian randomization: Using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology., Stat Med, 27, 1133, 10.1002/sim.3034
Evans, 2015, Mendelian randomization: New applications in the coming age of hypothesis-free causality., Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet, 16, 327, 10.1146/annurev-genom-090314-050016
Weed, 1998, Biologic plausibility in causal inference: Current method and practice., Am J Epidemiol, 147, 415, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009466
Jansen, 2014, Mendelian randomization studies in coronary artery disease., Eur Heart J, 35, 1917, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu208
Greenland, 2000, An introduction to instrumental variables for epidemiologists., Int J Epidemiol, 29, 722, 10.1093/ije/29.4.722
Thomas, 2004, Commentary: The concept of ‘Mendelian randomization’., Int J Epidemiol, 33, 21, 10.1093/ije/dyh048
Bennett, 2010, An introduction to instrumental variables analysis: Part 1., Neuroepidemiology, 35, 237, 10.1159/000319455
Taylor, 2014, Mendelian randomization in health research: Using appropriate genetic variants and avoiding biased estimates., Econ Hum Biol, 13, 99, 10.1016/j.ehb.2013.12.002
Bennett, 2010, An introduction to instrumental variables--part 2: Mendelian randomisation., Neuroepidemiology, 35, 307, 10.1159/000321179
Burgess, 2015, Mendelian randomization: Where are we now and where are we going?, Int J Epidemiol, 44, 379, 10.1093/ije/dyv108
Verduijn, 2010, Mendelian randomization: Use of genetics to enable causal inference in observational studies., Nephrol Dial Transplant, 25, 1394, 10.1093/ndt/gfq098
Smith, 2014, Association of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-related genetic variants with aortic valve calcium and incident aortic stenosis., JAMA, 312, 1764, 10.1001/jama.2014.13959
Davey Smith, 2014, Mendelian randomization: Genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies., Hum Mol Genet, 23, R89, 10.1093/hmg/ddu328
Palmer, 2012, Using multiple genetic variants as instrumental variables for modifiable risk factors., Stat Methods Med Res, 21, 223, 10.1177/0962280210394459
Burgess, 2013, Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data., Genet Epidemiol, 37, 658, 10.1002/gepi.21758
Davies, 2015, The many weak instruments problem and Mendelian randomization., Stat Med, 34, 454, 10.1002/sim.6358
Davies, 2013, Issues in the reporting and conduct of instrumental variable studies: A systematic review., Epidemiology, 24, 363, 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31828abafb
Swanson, 2013, Commentary: How to report instrumental variable analyses (suggestions welcome)., Epidemiology, 24, 370, 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31828d0590
Hernán, 2006, Instruments for causal inference: An epidemiologist’s dream?, Epidemiology, 17, 360, 10.1097/01.ede.0000222409.00878.37
Del Greco, 2015, Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome., Stat Med, 34, 2926, 10.1002/sim.6522
Martens, 2006, Instrumental variables: Application and limitations., Epidemiology, 17, 260, 10.1097/01.ede.0000215160.88317.cb
Didelez, 2010, Assumptions of IV methods for observational epidemiology., Stat Sci, 25, 22, 10.1214/09-STS316
Clarke, 2012, Instrumental variable estimators for binary outcomes., J Am Stat Assoc, 107, 1638, 10.1080/01621459.2012.734171
Burgess, A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization [published online ahead of print August 17, 2015]., Stat Methods Med Res
Palmer, 2008, Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses., Int J Epidemiol, 37, 1161, 10.1093/ije/dyn080
Palmer, 2011, Instrumental variable estimation of causal risk ratios and causal odds ratios in Mendelian randomization analyses., Am J Epidemiol, 173, 1392, 10.1093/aje/kwr026
Vuistiner, 2012, A comparison of three methods of Mendelian randomization when the genetic instrument, the risk factor and the outcome are all binary., PLoS One, 7, e35951, 10.1371/journal.pone.0035951
Harbord, 2013, Severity of bias of a simple estimator of the causal odds ratio in Mendelian randomization studies., Stat Med, 32, 1246, 10.1002/sim.5659
Boef, 2015, Mendelian randomization studies: A review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting., Int J Epidemiol, 44, 496, 10.1093/ije/dyv071
Freathy, 2008, Common variation in the FTO gene alters diabetes-related metabolic traits to the extent expected given its effect on BMI., Diabetes, 57, 1419, 10.2337/db07-1466
Brion, 2014, Beyond the single SNP: Emerging developments in mendelian randomization in the “omics” era., Curr Epidemiol Rep, 1, 228, 10.1007/s40471-014-0024-2
Inoue, 2010, Two-sample instrumental variables estimators., Rev Econ Stat, 92, 557, 10.1162/REST_a_00011
Pierce, 2013, Efficient design for Mendelian randomization studies: Subsample and 2-sample instrumental variable estimators., Am J Epidemiol, 178, 1177, 10.1093/aje/kwt084
Welsh, 2010, Unraveling the directional link between adiposity and inflammation: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization approach., J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 95, 93, 10.1210/jc.2009-1064
Palmer, 2013, Association of plasma uric acid with ischaemic heart disease and blood pressure: Mendelian randomisation analysis of two large cohorts., BMJ, 347, f4262, 10.1136/bmj.f4262
Burgess, 2015, Network Mendelian randomization: Using genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate mediation in causal pathways., Int J Epidemiol, 44, 484, 10.1093/ije/dyu176
Relton, 2012, Two-step epigenetic Mendelian randomization: A strategy for establishing the causal role of epigenetic processes in pathways to disease., Int J Epidemiol, 41, 161, 10.1093/ije/dyr233
Varbo, 2015, Remnant cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and blood pressure as mediators from obesity to ischemic heart disease., Circ Res, 116, 665, 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.304846
Evans, 2013, Mining the human phenome using allelic scores that index biological intermediates., PLoS Genet, 9, e1003919, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003919
Linsel-Nitschke, 2008, Lifelong reduction of LDL-cholesterol related to a common variant in the LDL-receptor gene decreases the risk of coronary artery disease--a Mendelian Randomisation study., PLoS One, 3, e2986, 10.1371/journal.pone.0002986
Ference, 2012, Effect of long-term exposure to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol beginning early in life on the risk of coronary heart disease: A Mendelian randomization analysis., J Am Coll Cardiol, 60, 2631, 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.017
Voight, 2012, Plasma HDL cholesterol and risk of myocardial infarction: A mendelian randomisation study., Lancet, 380, 572, 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60312-2
Burkhardt, 2008, Common SNPs in HMGCR in micronesians and whites associated with LDL-cholesterol levels affect alternative splicing of exon13., Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 28, 2078, 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.172288
Talmud, 2009, Gene-centric association signals for lipids and apolipoproteins identified via the HumanCVD BeadChip., Am J Hum Genet, 85, 628, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.014
McKenney, 2015, Understanding PCSK9 and anti-PCSK9 therapies., J Clin Lipidol, 9, 170, 10.1016/j.jacl.2015.01.001
Zacho, 2008, Genetically elevated C-reactive protein and ischemic vascular disease., N Engl J Med, 359, 1897, 10.1056/NEJMoa0707402
Elliott, 2009, Genetic Loci associated with C-reactive protein levels and risk of coronary heart disease., JAMA, 302, 37, 10.1001/jama.2009.954
Wensley, 2011, Association between C reactive protein and coronary heart disease: Mendelian randomisation analysis based on individual participant data., BMJ, 342, d548, 10.1136/bmj.d548
VanderWeele, 2014, Methodological challenges in mendelian randomization., Epidemiology, 25, 427, 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000081
Swerdlow, 2015, HMG-coenzyme A reductase inhibition, type 2 diabetes, and bodyweight: Evidence from genetic analysis and randomised trials., Lancet, 385, 351, 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61183-1
Testa, 2014, Association of a polymorphism in a gene encoding a urate transporter with CKD progression., Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 9, 1059, 10.2215/CJN.11041013
Hughes, 2014, Mendelian randomization analysis associates increased serum urate, due to genetic variation in uric acid transporters, with improved renal function., Kidney Int, 85, 344, 10.1038/ki.2013.353
Yang, 2010, Multiple genetic loci influence serum urate levels and their relationship with gout and cardiovascular disease risk factors., Circ Cardiovasc Genet, 3, 523, 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.109.934455
Greenberg, 2015, Plasma urate and risk of a hospital stay with AKI: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study., Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 10, 776, 10.2215/CJN.05870614
Del Greco, Serum iron level and kidney function: A Mendelian randomization study [published online ahead of print June 2, 2016]., Nephrol Dial Transplant
Benyamin, 2014, Novel loci affecting iron homeostasis and their effects in individuals at risk for hemochromatosis., Nat Commun, 5, 4926, 10.1038/ncomms5926
Pattaro, 2012, Genome-wide association and functional follow-up reveals new loci for kidney function., PLoS Genet, 8, e1002584, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002584
Panduru, 2015, Kidney injury molecule-1 and the loss of kidney function in diabetic nephropathy: A likely causal link in patients with type 1 diabetes., Diabetes Care, 38, 1130, 10.2337/dc14-2330
Todd, 2015, Genetic evidence for a causal role of obesity in diabetic kidney disease., Diabetes, 64, 4238, 10.2337/db15-0254
Verduijn, 2011, Is fetuin-A a mortality risk factor in dialysis patients or a mere risk marker? A Mendelian randomization approach., Nephrol Dial Transplant, 26, 239, 10.1093/ndt/gfq402
Zoccali, 2006, Mendelian randomization: A new approach to studying epidemiology in ESRD., Am J Kidney Dis, 47, 332, 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.10.027
Liu, 2004, Association between cholesterol level and mortality in dialysis patients: Role of inflammation and malnutrition., JAMA, 291, 451, 10.1001/jama.291.4.451
Boef, 2015, Mendelian randomization studies in the elderly., Epidemiology, 26, e15, 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000243
Böger, 2011, CUBN is a gene locus for albuminuria., J Am Soc Nephrol, 22, 555, 10.1681/ASN.2010060598
Köttgen, 2010, New loci associated with kidney function and chronic kidney disease., Nat Genet, 42, 376, 10.1038/ng.568
Pattaro, 2016, Genetic associations at 53 loci highlight cell types and biological pathways relevant for kidney function., Nat Commun, 7, 10023, 10.1038/ncomms10023
Okada, 2012, Meta-analysis identifies multiple loci associated with kidney function-related traits in east Asian populations., Nat Genet, 44, 904, 10.1038/ng.2352
Gharavi, 2011, Genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for IgA nephropathy., Nat Genet, 43, 321, 10.1038/ng.787
Yu, 2011, A genome-wide association study in Han Chinese identifies multiple susceptibility loci for IgA nephropathy., Nat Genet, 44, 178, 10.1038/ng.1047
Kiryluk, 2014, Discovery of new risk loci for IgA nephropathy implicates genes involved in immunity against intestinal pathogens., Nat Genet, 46, 1187, 10.1038/ng.3118
Köttgen, 2013, Genome-wide association analyses identify 18 new loci associated with serum urate concentrations., Nat Genet, 45, 145, 10.1038/ng.2500
Sandholm, 2013, Chromosome 2q31.1 associates with ESRD in women with type 1 diabetes., J Am Soc Nephrol, 24, 1537, 10.1681/ASN.2012111122
Iyengar, 2015, Genome-wide association and trans-ethnic meta-analysis for advanced diabetic kidney disease: Family Investigation of Nephropathy and Diabetes (FIND)., PLoS Genet, 11, e1005352, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005352
Olden, 2013, Overlap between common genetic polymorphisms underpinning kidney traits and cardiovascular disease phenotypes: The CKDGen consortium., Am J Kidney Dis, 61, 889, 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.12.024
Matsushita, 2010, Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: A collaborative meta-analysis., Lancet, 375, 2073, 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60674-5
Rosenbaum, 1983, The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects., Biometrika, 70, 41, 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
D’Agostino, 1998, Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group., Stat Med, 17, 2265, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::AID-SIM918>3.0.CO;2-B
Robins, 2000, Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology., Epidemiology, 11, 550, 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00011
Joffe, 2004, Model selection, confounder control, and marginal structural models: Review and new applications., Am Stat, 58, 272, 10.1198/000313004X5824
Brion, 2013, Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies., Int J Epidemiol, 42, 1497, 10.1093/ije/dyt179
Freeman, 2013, Power and sample size calculations for Mendelian randomization studies using one genetic instrument., Int J Epidemiol, 42, 1157, 10.1093/ije/dyt110
Burgess, 2014, Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome., Int J Epidemiol, 43, 922, 10.1093/ije/dyu005
Baigent, 2005, Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: Prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins., Lancet, 366, 1267, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67394-1
Millard, 2015, MR-PheWAS: Hypothesis prioritization among potential causal effects of body mass index on many outcomes, using Mendelian randomization., Sci Rep, 5, 16645, 10.1038/srep16645
Burgess, 2011, Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies., Int J Epidemiol, 40, 755, 10.1093/ije/dyr036
Burgess, 2013, Use of allele scores as instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization., Int J Epidemiol, 42, 1134, 10.1093/ije/dyt093
Bowden, 2015, Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: Effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression., Int J Epidemiol, 44, 512, 10.1093/ije/dyv080
Mokry, 2015, Mendelian randomisation applied to drug development in cardiovascular disease: A review., J Med Genet, 52, 71, 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102438
Osier, 2002, A global perspective on genetic variation at the ADH genes reveals unusual patterns of linkage disequilibrium and diversity., Am J Hum Genet, 71, 84, 10.1086/341290
Lewis, 2005, Alcohol, ALDH2, and esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis which illustrates the potentials and limitations of a Mendelian randomization approach., Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 14, 1967, 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0196