Memory, emotion and the enactment of wellbeing over time

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 42 - Trang 19263-19272 - 2022
Søren Harnow Klausen1, Lejla Hasandedic-Dapo2
1Department for the Study of Culture, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
2Department of Psychology, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey

Tóm tắt

The ability to selectively remember positive events is assumed to be one of the key adaptive mechanisms that enable especially older adults to maintain a high level of wellbeing, in spite of declining physical and cognitive functions. This is often explained as a positive side-effect of an attentional bias, the so-called “positivity effect”. We argue, however, that there are both theoretical reasons and empirical evidence for assuming that it that the subsequent, constructive use of memory need not always misrepresent events, but can also help to reveal the full significance of an event, which was not necessarily transparent to the individual at the outset. We tentatively consider a holistic and time-sensitive view of wellbeing, which, contrary to standard atomistic and time-neutral theories, assumes the quality of events and experience depends on the larger life-context in which they become embedded, so that the contribution of events and experiences to the overall quality of one’s life can change over time. We provide empirical support for our theoretical conjectures by analysing the results of an interview-based study of emotional memory of early autobiographical life events.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alexandrova, A. (2017). A Philosophy for the Science of Well-Being. Oxford University Press. Bader, R. (2016). ”Conditions. In E. Lord & B. Maguire (Eds.), Modifiers and Holism”, in Weighing Reasons (pp. 27–55). Oxford University Press. Benatar, D. (2017). The Human Predicament. Oxford University Press. Blanchflower, D. G. (2021). (2021) “Is happiness U-shaped everywhere? Age and subjective well-being in 145 countries.” Journal of Population Economy, 34, 575–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-020-00797-z Broome, J. (1991). Weighing Goods Equality, Uncertainty and Time. Wiley-Blackwell. Brun, G. (2017). Conceptual re-engineering: from explication to reflective equilibrium. Synthese, 197, 925–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1596-4 (2020). Cappelen, H. (2018). Fixing Language. An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford University Press. Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist., 54(3), 165–181. Carstensen, L. L., & Charles, S. T. (2003). Human aging Why is even good news taken as bad? In L. G. Aspinwall & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.), A psychology of human strengths Fundamental questions and future directions for positive psychology (pp. 75–86). American Psychological Association. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). Routledge Falmer. Conde, C., Costa, V., & Tomaz, C. (2000). Effects of emotional reactivity on inhibitory avoidance in the elevated T-maze. Brazilian Journal of Medical Biological Research, 33(2), 233–236. Conway, M. A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 594–628. Cresswell, J. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications. Crisp, R. (2017). “Wellbeing”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Deptula, D., Singh, R., & Pomara, N. (1993). Aging, emotional states, and memory. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150(3), 429–434. Gallo, D. A., Foster, K. T., & Johnson, E. L. (2009). Elevated false recollection of emotional pictures in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 24(4), 981–988. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017545 Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. (2010). Positive aging: Resilience and reconstruction. In P. Fry & C. Keyes (Eds.), New frontiers in resilient aging: Life-strengths and well- being in later life (pp. 340–356). Cambridge University Press. Haug, M. C. (Ed.). (2014). Philosophical Methodology: The Armchair or the Laboratory? Routledge. Heidegger, M. (1986) [1927]. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer Kahneman, D. (2000). Experienced Utility and Happiness: A Moment-Based approach. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, Values and Frames (pp. 673–692). Cambridge University Press. Kierkegaard, S. A. (1992). [1843]. Either/Or. A Fragment of Life. (transl. A. Hannay.). London: Penguin. Klausen, S. H. (2016). Happiness, dispositions and the self. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(3), 995–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9628-6 Klausen, S. H. (2018a). Having or being? Happiness and the structure of human life. Kultura - Media - Teologia, 35(4), 24–38. Klausen, S. H. (2018b). Ethics, knowledge, and a procedural approach to wellbeing. Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2018.1529619 Klausen, S. H. (2018c). Dealing with happiness. In search of a personal happiness policy. In T. Delaney & T. Madigan (Eds.), Happiness and friendship (pp. 91–99). Vernon Press. Klausen, S. H. (2019a). Happiness and the structure and dynamics of human life. In Klausen, et al. (Eds.), Perspectives on happiness (pp. 88–97). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004395794_012 Klausen, S. H. (2019b). Understanding older adults’ wellbeing from a philosophical perspective. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(7), 2629–2648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00197-5 Klausen, S. H., Engelsen, S., Christiansen, R., & Emiliussen, J. (2020). Elderly wellbeing and alcohol – A tricky cocktail. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920931687 Klausen, S. H., Christiansen, R., Emiliussen, J. & Hasandedic-Dapo, L., & Engelsen, S. (2021). The many faces of hedonic adaptation. Philosophical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2021.1967308 Labar, K. S., & Cabeza, R. (2006). Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 54–64. Lawton, M. P. (2001). Emotion in later life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 120–123. Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press. Pinquart, M. (2001). Age Differences in Perceived Positive Affect, Negative Affect, and Affect Balance in Middle and Old Age. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2(4), 375–405. Machery, E., & O’Neill, E. (Eds.). (2014). Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy. Routledge. Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2005). Aging and motivated cognition: The positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 496–502. Raibley, J. (2012). Welfare Over Time and the Case for Holism. Philosophical Papers, 41(2), 239–265. Reed, A. E., & Carstensen, L. L. (2012). The theory behind the age-related positivity effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 339. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00339 Rettie, H., & Emiliussen, J. (2018). Practical impressions of interpretative phenomenological analysis from the novice’s standpoint. Nurse Researcher, 26(2), 46–49. Paley, J. (2017). Phenomenology as Qualitative Research – a critical analysis of meaning attribution. Routledge. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. Sartre, J. P. (2005). [1943] Being and Nothingness. Routledge. Slote, M. (1983). Goods and virtues. Clarendon Press. Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51–80). Sage. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. SAGE Publications. Sparks, J. & A. Ledgerwood (2014). ”Age attenuates the negativity bias in reframing effects”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1–15 Tiberius, V. (2008). The reflective life. Living wisely with our limits. Oxford University Press. Velleman, D. (1991). “Well-Being and Time. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 72, 48–77.