Meeting the Challenges of English Learners by Pairing Science and Language Educators

Anstrom, K., & DiCerbo, P. (2011). Advanced literacy in science: Language demands and PD practices. AccELLerate! 2. Bakhtin, M. M. (2010). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (Vol. 1). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. Bao, X. (2017). Application of multimodality to teaching reading. English Language and Literature Studies, 7(3), 78. Bobis, J., Sweller, J., & Cooper, M. (1993). Cognitive load effects in a primary school geometry task. Learning and Instruction, 3, 1–21. Brush, T. A., & Saye, J. W. (2002). A summary of research exploring hard and soft scaffolding for teachers and students using a multimedia supported learning environment. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1, 1–2. Cammarata, L., & Tedick, D. J. (2012). Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 251–269. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and the schools. New York: Teachers College Press. Case, R. (2002). The intersection of language, education, and content: Science instruction for ESL students. The Clearing House, 76(2), 71–74. Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse: The learning of teaching and learning. London: Heinmann. Chamot, A. U., & O’malley, J. M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 227–249. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1992). The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 233–246. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1996). Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 151–170. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2013). Multiliteracies: New literacies new learning. In M. Hawkins (Ed.), Framing languages and literacies: Socially situated views and perspectives (pp. 105–135). New York: Routledge. Council of Chief State Schools (2012). Framework for English language proficiency: Development standards corresponding to the common core state standards and the next generation science standards. Washington DC: CCSSO. Council of Europe (2011). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Cadre1_en.asp. Creese, A. (2000). The role of language specialists in disciplinary teaching: In search of a subject? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development., 21(6), 451–470. Creese, A. (2006). Supporting talk? Partnership teachers in classroom interaction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9, 434–453. Crystal, D. (2012). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the cross fire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Cummins, J. (2014). Rethinking pedagogical assumptions in Canadian French immersion programs. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 2(1), 3–22. DeCapua, A., & Marshall, H.W. (2011). Breaking new ground: Teacher students with limited or interrupted formal education in U.S. secondary schools. Ann Harbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Dong, Y. (2002). Integrating language and content: How three biology teachers work with non-English speaking students. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 5(1), 40–57. Fillmore, L. W., & Snow, C. E. (2000). What teachers need to know about language. Retrieved July 24, 2018 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED444379.pdf Gee, J. (2000). Discourse and sociocultural studies in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume III (pp. 195–207). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Retrieved November 9, 2001, from http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=handbook/gee/. Gee, J. (2005). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In R. Yerrick & W.-M. Roth (Eds.), Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of teaching and learning research (pp. 19–37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Genesee, F. (1994) Integrating language and content: Lessons from immersion. Educational Practice Reports. No 11. National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. Glass, R., & Oliveira, A. (2014). Science language accommodation in elementary school read-alouds. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 577–609. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. Grant, E. A., & Wong, S. D. (2003). Barriers to literacy for language-minority learners: An argument for change in the literacy education profession. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46(5), 386–394. Hamann, E. T., & Reeves, J. (2013). Interrupting the professional schism that allows less successful educational practices with ELLs to persist. Theory Into Practice, 52(2), 81–88. Hoare, P., Kong, S., & Bell, J. (2008). Using language objectives to integrate language and content instruction: A case history of planning and implementation challenges. Language and Education, 22, 187–205. Honigsfeld, A., & Dove, M. G. (2010). Collaboration and co-teaching: Strategies for English learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Huang, J. (2004). Socialising ESL students into the discourse of school science through academic writing. Language and Education, 18(2), 97–123. Interagency Language Roundtable (2011). Description of proficiency levels. Retrieved from http://www.govtilr.org/Skills/ILRscale1.htm. Jacoby, S., & Gonzales, P. (1991). The constitution of expert-novice in scientific discourse. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 149–181. Kieffer, M., & Thompson, K. (2018). Hidden progress on multilingual students on NAEP. Educational Researcher, 47(6), 391–398. Kim, M. C., Hannafin, M. J., & Bryan, L. A. (2007). Technology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education: An emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. Science Education, 91(6), 1010–1030. Kozma, R. B. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 949–968. Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1–14. Lazuruk, W. (2007). Linguistic, academic, and cognitive benefits of French immersion. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 605–628. Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2006). Science education and student diversity: Synthesis and research agenda. New York: Cambridge University Press. Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for common core state standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233. Llosa, L., Lee, O., Jiang, F., Haas, A., O’Connor, C., Van Booven, C. D., & Kieffer, M. J. (2016). Impact of a large-scale science intervention focused on English language learners. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 395–424. Lyon, E., Bunch, G., & Shaw, J. (2012). Navigating the language demands of an inquiry-based science performance assessment: Classroom challenges and opportunities for English learners. Science Education, 96(4), 631–651. Lyster, R., & Ballinger, S. (2011). Content-based language teaching: Convergent concerns across divergent contexts. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 279–288. Luykx, A., Lee, O., & Edwards, U. (2008). Lost in translation: Negotiating meaning in a beginning ESOL science classroom. Educational Policy, 22(5), 640–674. Lucas, T., Villegas, A. M., & Freedson-Gonzalez, M. (2008). Linguistically responsive teacher education: Preparing classroom teachers to teach English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 361–373. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2012). Interaction approach in second language acquisition. In C.A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Chichester, UK:Wiley-Blackwell. Manavathu, M., & Zhou, G. (2012). The impact of differentiated instructional materials on English language learner (ELL) students’ comprehension of science laboratory tasks. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 12(4), 334–349. Márquez, C., Izquierdo, M., & Espinet, M. (2006). Multimodal science teachers’ discourse in modeling the water cycle. Science Education, 90(2), 202–226. Marsh, D. (Ed.). (2002). CLIL/EMILE—the European dimension: Actions, trends and foresight. European Commission: Potential Public Services Contract DG EAC. Mayer, R., & Anderson, R. (1991). Animations need narrations: an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484. Mayer, R., & Anderson, R. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444. McDonald, S. P. (2008). Seeing the science: Professional pedagogical vision for instructional leaders. Catalyst for Change, 35, 12–18. Menken, K. (2013). Emergent bilingual students in secondary school: Along the academic language and literacy continuum. Language Teaching, 46, 438–476. Mensah, F. (2009). Confronting assumptions, biases, and stereotypes in preservice teachers' conceptualizations of science teaching through the use of book club. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 1041–1066. Meskill, C. (2005a). Infusing English language learner issues throughout professional educator curricula: The Training All Teachers Project. Teachers College Record, 107, 739–756. Meskill, C. (2005b). Triadic scaffolds: Tools for teaching English language learners with computers. Language Learning Technology, 8, 46–59. Meskill, C., & Mossop, J. (2000). Electronic texts in English to speakers of other languages classrooms. Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages Quarterly, 34, 585–592. Meskill, C., Oliveira, A., Gregory, K., Oliver, G., Reichen, B., & Witmer, P. (2014). Professional development in support of English learner achievement: Science and ESOL educator collaborations. In A Handbook to Implement Educational Programs, Practices, and Policies for English Language Learners, Information Age Press. Mohan, B., & Slater, S. (2006). Examining the theory/practice relation in a high school science register: A functional linguistic perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 302–316. Moore, E., Evnitskaya, N., & Ramos-de Robles, S. L. (2017). Teaching and learning science in linguistically diverse classrooms. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1–12. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 156–163. NYSED. (2012a). NYS bilingual common core initiative: Theoretical foundations. Albany NY: EngageNY Retrieved from https://www.engageny.org/file/135506/download/nysbcci-theoretical-foundations.pdf. NYSED. (2012b). NYS bilingual common core initiative: Teacher’s guide to implement the bilingual common core progressions. Albany NY: EngageNY Retrieved from https://www.engageny.org/file/135511/download/teachers-guide-to-implement-the-bilingual-cc-progressions.pdf. Oliveira, A. W., & Weinburgh, M. (Eds.). (2016a). Science teacher preparation in content-based second language acquisition. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG. Oliveira, A., & Weinburgh, M. (2016b). Guided visualization: Promoting EL science literacies through images. In L. C. de Oliveira (Ed.), The Common Core State Standards Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technological Subjects for English language learners: Grades 6-12 (pp. 91–106). Alexandria: TESOL Press. Pearson, P. D., Moje, E., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science, 328(5977), 459–463. Pritchard, R., & O’Hara, S. (2016). Framing the teaching of academic language to English learners: A Delphi study of expert consensus. TESOL Quarterly, 51, 418–428. Rodgers, C. R. (2002). Seeing student learning: Teacher change and the role of reflection. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 230–253. Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 61–94. Roth, W.-M. (2014). Science language wanted alive: Through the dialectical/dialogical lens of Vygotsky and the Bakhtin Circle. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 1049–1083. Snow, M., Met, M., & Genesee, F. (1989). A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction. Tesol Quarterly, 23, 201–217. Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 664–687. Sylvén, L., & Sundqvist, S. (2012). Gaming as extramural English L2 learning and L2 proficiency among young learners. ReCALL, 24, 302–321. Swain, M., & Watanabe, Y. (2012). Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, M., & Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load and selective attention as factors in the structuring of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychololgy, 119, 176–192. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571–596. Wesche, M. (Ed.). (2001). French immersion and content-based language teaching in Canada. Special issue of The Canadian Modern Language Review, 58(1). Wesche, M. B., & Skehan, P. (2002). Communicative, task-based, and content-based language instruction. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 207–288). New York: Oxford University Press. WIDA. (2012). 2012 amplification of the English language development standards: Kindergarten-Grade 12. Madison, WI: Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. Wright, K., Eslami, Z., McTigue, E., & Reynolds, D. (2015). Picture perfect: Using quality graphics to support English language learners in science class. The Science Teacher, 82, 41–46. Yang, S., & Walker, V. (2015). A pedagogical framework for technology integration in ESL classrooms: The promises and challenges of integration. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 24, 179–203. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.