Medical student attitudes toward video games and related new media technologies in medical education
Tóm tắt
Studies in K-12 and college students show that their learning preferences have been strongly shaped by new media technologies like video games, virtual reality environments, the Internet, and social networks. However, there is no known research on medical students' game experiences or attitudes towards new media technologies in medical education. This investigation seeks to elucidate medical student experiences and attitudes, to see whether they warrant the development of new media teaching methods in medicine.
Medical students from two American universities participated. An anonymous, 30-item, cross-sectional survey addressed demographics, game play experience and attitudes on using new media technologies in medical education. Statistical analysis identified: 1) demographic characteristics; 2) differences between the two universities; 3) how video game play differs across gender, age, degree program and familiarity with computers; and 4) characteristics of students who play most frequently.
217 medical students participated. About half were female (53%). Respondents liked the idea of using technology to enhance healthcare education (98%), felt that education should make better use of new media technologies (96%), and believed that video games can have educational value (80%). A majority (77%) would use a multiplayer online healthcare simulation on their own time, provided that it helped them to accomplish an important goal. Men and women agreed that they were most inclined to use multiplayer simulations if they were fun (97%), and if they helped to develop skill in patient interactions (90%). However, there was significant gender dissonance over types of favorite games, the educational value of video games, and the desire to participate in games that realistically replicated the experience of clinical practice.
Overall, medical student respondents, including many who do not play video games, held highly favorable views about the use of video games and related new media technology in medical education. Significant gender differences in game play experience and attitudes may represent male video game design bias that stresses male cognitive aptitudes; medical educators hoping to create serious games that will appeal to both men and women must avoid this.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Friedman CP: The marvelous medical education machine or how medical education can be "unstuck" in time. Medical Teacher. 2000, 22 (5): 496-502. 10.1080/01421590050110786.
The Oxford English Dictionary. 1989, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, Second
Foerman J: Game-Based learning: How to delight and instruct in the 21st century. 2004, 39 (5): 50-66.
Griffiths MD, Davies MNO, Chappell D: Breaking the stereotype: The case of online gaming. Cyber Psychology & Behavior. 2003, 6 (1): 81-91.
Yee N: The demographics, motivations, and derived experiences of users of massively multi-user online graphical environments. Presence. 2006, 15 (3): 309-329. 10.1162/pres.15.3.309.
Holzinger A, Kickmeir-Rust M, Albert D: Dynamic media in computer science education: Content complexity and learning preformance: Is less more?. Educational Technology & Society. 2008, 11 (1): 279-290.
Gee JP: What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. 2003, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1
Shaffer DW: Epistemic Games. Innovate Journal of Online Education. 2005, 1 (6).
Reeves B, Malone TW, O'Driscoll T: Leadership's Online Labs. Harvard Business Review. 2008, 59-66.
IBM's Management Games. [http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2007/tc20070613_838152.htm]
Cisco Launches 'Subnetting Game'. [http://www.huliq.com/13438/cisco-launches-subnetting-game]
Raybourn EM: Computer game design: New directions for intercultural simulation game designers. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises. 1997, 24.
Raybourn EM: Applying simulation experience design methods to creating serious game-based adaptive training systems. The American Digital Library. 2007, 19 (2): 206-214.
Virtual Worlds: A first-hand account of market and society on the Cyberian Frontier. [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=294828]
On Virtual Economies. [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=338500]
Elam C, Stratton T, Gibson DG: Welcoming a new generation to college: The Millennial students. Journal of College Admission. 2007, 195 (Spring): 20-25.
Oblinger DG, Boomer , Gen-Xers , Millennials : Understanding new students. Educause Review. 2003, 38 (4): 37-47.
Oblinger DG, Oblinger JL: Educating the Net Generation. Edited by: Oblinger DG, Oblinger JL. 2005, EDUCAUSE
Grunwald Associates: Children, Familes and the Internet. 2003, Grunwald Associates LLC
Strauss W, Howe N: Millennials Rising: The next great generation. 2000, New York: Vantage Press
Creating & Connecting: Research and guidelines on online social and educational networking. [http://www.nsba.org/site/view.asp?CID=63&DID=41340]
Sweeny RT: How the new generation of well-wired multitaskers is changing campus culture. Chronicle of Higher Education. 2007, 53 (13).
Lenhart A, Madden M, Hitlin P: Teens and Technology: Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. 2005, PEW INTERNET & AMERICAN LIFE PROJECT
Health Games Research. [http://www.healthgamesresearch.org/]
Building the Field of Digital Media and Learning. [http://digitallearning.macfound.org/site/c.enJLKQNlFiG/b.2029199/k.BFC9/Home.htm]
Kanter : A"Grand Challenge" from the new editor. Academic Medicine. 2008, 83 (1): 1-2. 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181613b77.
SurveyMonkey: The simple way to create surveys. [http://www.surveymonkey.com/]
Newton DA, Grayson MS, Whitley TW: What predicts medical student career choice?. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1998, 13 (3): 200-203. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00057.x.
Zink BJ, Hammoud MM, Middleton E, Moroney D, Schigelone A: A comprehensive medical student career development program improves medical student satisfaction with career planning. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2007, 19 (1): 55-60. 10.1207/s15328015tlm1901_10.
Alverson DC, Saiki SM, Caudell TP, Goldsmith T, Stevens S, Saland L, Colleran K, Brandt J, Danielson L, Cerilli L, et al: Reification of abstract concepts to improve comprehension using interactive virtual environments and a knowledge-based design: a renal physiology model. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. 2006, 119: 13-18.
McLauhan M: Classrooms without walls. Explorations in Communication. 1960, Boston, MA: Beacon Press
Baker C: Trying to design a truly entertaining game can defeat even a certified genous. 2010, Wired Magizine, 16.
Baker C, Exploring Arden: Is the Shakespearean MMOG a blast or a bore?. 2010, Wired Magizine, 16.
Naone E: Virtual labor lost. Technol Rev. 2007
Lenhart A, Jones S, Rankin-Macgill A: Video games: Adults are players too. 2008, PewResearchCenter Publications
Williams D, Martins N, Consalvo M, Ivory JD: The virtual census: representations of gender, race and age in video games. New Media & Society. 2009, 11 (5): 815-834. 10.1177/1461444809105354.
Kimura D: Sex and Cognition. Archives of Sexual Behavior. Edited by: Hines M. 2001, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 30: 551-554. 10.1023/A:1010247419335.
Rollings A, Adams E: Andrew Rolliings and Ernest Adams on game design: New Riders. 2003
Wolf MJP: Genre and video game. The medium of the video game. Edited by: Wolf MJP. 2001, Austin: University of Texas, 113-134.
Lucas K, Sherry JL: Sex differences in video game play. Communication Research. 2004, 31 (5): 499-523. 10.1177/0093650204267930.
Tempski P, Perotta B, Pose RA, Vieira JE: A questionnaire on the quality of life of medical students. Med Educ. 2009, 43 (11): 1107-1108. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03476.x.
Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Shanafelt TD: Systematic review of depression, anxiety, and other indicators of psychological distress among U.S. and Canadian medical students. Acad Med. 2006, 81 (4): 354-373. 10.1097/00001888-200604000-00009.
Clark EJ, Rieker PP: Gender differences in relationships and stress of medical and law students. J Med Educ. 1986, 61 (1): 32-40.
Paro HBMS, Morales NMO, Silva CHM, Rezende CHA, Pinto RMC, Morales RR, Mendonca TMS, Prado MM: Health-related quality of life of medical students. Medical Education. 2010, 4 (3): 227-235. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03587.x.
ISI: Center for advanced research in technology for education. [http://www.isi.edu/isd/carte/proj_tactlang/]
DARWARS: DARWARS training systems. [http://www.bbn.com/technology/immersive_learning_technologies/darwars]
Martin JB: Educating doctors to provide high quality medical care: A vision for medical education in the United States. 2004, Edited by Colleges CoDAoAM
Campo R: A piece of my mind. "The medical humanities," for lack of a better term. JAMA. 2005, 294 (9): 1009-1011. 10.1001/jama.294.9.1009.
Gross ML: Medical ethics education: to what ends?. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2001, 7 (4): 387-397. 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00277.x.
A flag in the wind: Educating for professionalism in Medicine. [http://www.regenstrief.org/bio/professionalism.pdf/download]
Surry D, Land S: Strategies for Motivating Higher Education Faculty to use technology. Innovations in Educaton and Training International. 2000, 37 (2): 145-153.
Zayim N, Yildirim S, Saka O: Technology adoption of medical faculty in teachig: Differentiating factors in adopter categories. Educational Technology & Society. 2006, 9 (2): 213-222.
Barnes K, Marateo RC, Ferris S: Teaching and learning with the net generation. Innovate. 2007, 3 (4).