Measuring impacts of microplastic treatments via image recognition on immobilised particles below 100 μm

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 1 Số 1 - 2021
Robin Lenz1, Kristina Enders1, Franziska Fischer2, Josef Brandt3, Dieter Fischer2, Matthias Labrenz1
1Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Warnemünde, Seestraße 15, 18119 Rostock, Germany
2Leibniz Institute of Polymer Research Dresden, Hohe Straße 6, 01069 Dresden, Germany
3University of Gothenburg, Department of Marine Sciences, Kristineberg 566, S-45178, Fiskebäckskil, Sweden

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe treatment of samples for microplastic (MP) analysis requires purification steps that sufficiently reduce the non-MP content while preserving the targeted particles integrity. Besides their macromolecular structure this also encompasses their in situ numbers and sizes. However, any step of sample manipulation will come at a cost: particle loss, fragmentation, coagulation or degradation may lead to distorted results, predominantly in the smaller fraction of the MP size range. Therefore, the evaluation of MP resistivity against applied methods such as chemical digestions is a vital criterion for obtaining meaningful results on MP content of a sample. We developed a framework to test the applicability of MP purification methods and apply it to four protocols commonly used to prepare environmental samples for MP particle identification. The approach was designed for MP particles being too small to be handled manually (i.e. 10–70 μm). The evaluation consists of a two-tiered assay: a simple particle suspension approach is used to confirm a post-treatment qualitative recognisability of the target polymers by the analysis method of choice (here Raman and FTIR). In a following quantitative part, immobilised particles are used to evaluate the preservation of particle numbers and areas after the treatment on an individual particle level. A Python image analysis package was written that identifies, matches and measures particles on pairs of pre- and post-treatment images, and is available as open source software. Our results show that the chemical digestions using hydrogen peroxide, cooled Fenton’s and a combined alkaline / oxidative treatment using potassium hydroxide and sodium hypochlorite are suitable methods for preparing MP samples for a microspectroscopic analyses. Also acidic sodium polytungstate solution used for MP density separations and a pentane based protocol for lipid removal were found applicable for small sized MP. Certain degradative effects were found when acrylonitrile butadiene styrene is exposed to acidic treatments, as well as for MP from acrylate and epoxy based paint resins in strong oxidative regimes. Several paint resins tested here were spectroscopically not identifiable by polymer attributed bands even before treatment, indicating that these materials might slip through analyses of environmental samples and consequently being underreported. We conclude that evaluating chemical treatment procedures on MP < 100 μm is feasible, despite limitations of the current methodology which we discuss. Our results provide more certainty on the tested methods for MP studies specifically targeting small sizes and should be extended for more protocols used in MP laboratory practises.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Enders K, Lenz R, Beer S, Stedmon CA. Extraction of microplastic from biota: recommended acidic digestion destroys common plastic polymers. ICES J Mar Sci. 2017;74(1):326–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw173.

Tagg AS, Harrison JP, Ju-Nam Y, Sapp M, Bradley EL, Sinclair CJ, et al. Fentons reagent for the rapid and efficient isolation of microplastics from wastewater. Chem Commun. 2017;53(2):372–5. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cc08798a.

Löder MGJ, Imhof HK, Ladehoff M, Löschel LA, Lorenz C, Mintenig S, et al. Enzymatic purification of microplastics in environmental samples. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(24):14283–92. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03055.

Kühn S, van Werven B, van Oyen A, Meijboom A, Rebolledo ELB, van Franeker JA. The use of potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution as a suitable approach to isolate plastics ingested by marine organisms. Mar Pollut Bull. 2017;115(1-2):86–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.11.034.

Dehaut A, Cassone A-L, Frère L, Hermabessiere L, Himber C, Rinnert E, et al. Microplastics in seafood: benchmark protocol for their extraction and characterization. Environ Pollut. 2016;215:223–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.018.

Avio CG, Gorbi S, Regoli F. Experimental development of a new protocol for extraction and characterization of microplastics in fish tissues: first observations in commercial species from Adriatic Sea. Mar Environ Res. 2015;111:18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.06.014.

Nuelle M-T, Dekiff JH, Remy D, Fries E. A new analytical approach for monitoring microplastics in marine sediments. Environ Pollut. 2014;184:161–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.07.027.

Mathalon A, Hill P. Microplastic fibers in the intertidal ecosystem surrounding Halifax Harbor, Nova Scotia. Mar Pollut Bull. 2014;81(1):69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.02.018.

Cole M, Webb H, Lindeque PK, Fileman ES, Halsband C, Galloway TS. Isolation of microplastics in biota-rich seawater samples and marine organisms. Sci Rep. 2014;4(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04528.

Claessens M, Cauwenberghe LV, Vandegehuchte MB, Janssen CR. New techniques for the detection of microplastics in sediments and field collected organisms. Mar Pollut Bull. 2013;70(1-2):227–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.03.009.

Karami A, Golieskardi A, Choo CK, Romano N, Ho YB, Salamatinia B. A high-performance protocol for extraction of microplastics in fish. Sci Total Environ. 2017;578:485–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.213.

Grbic J, Nguyen B, Guo E, You JB, Sinton D, Rochman CM. Magnetic extraction of microplastics from environmental samples. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2019;6(2):68–72. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00671.

Thiele CJ, Hudson MD, Russell AE. Evaluation of existing methods to extract microplastics from bivalve tissue: adapted KOH digestion protocol improves filtration at single-digit pore size. Mar Pollut Bull. 2019;142:384–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.03.003.

Pfeiffer F, Fischer EK. Various digestion protocols within microplastic sample processing evaluating the resistance of different synthetic polymers and the efficiency of biogenic organic matter destruction. Front Environ Sci. 2020;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.572424.

Lusher AL, Welden NA, Sobral P, Cole M. Sampling, isolating and identifying microplastics ingested by fish and invertebrates. Anal Methods. 2017;9(9):1346–60. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ay02415g.

Vandermeersch G, Cauwenberghe LV, Janssen CR, Marques A, Granby K, Fait G, et al. A critical view on microplastic quantification in aquatic organisms. Environ Res. 2015;143(Pt B):46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.07.016.

Bläsing M, Amelung W. Plastics in soil: analytical methods and possible sources. Sci Total Environ. 2018;612:422–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.086.

Quinn B, Murphy F, Ewins C. Validation of density separation for the rapid recovery of microplastics from sediment. Anal Methods. 2017;9(9):1491–8. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ay02542k.

Elert AM, Becker R, Duemichen E, Eisentraut P, Falkenhagen J, Sturm H, et al. Comparison of different methods for MP detection: what can we learn from them, and why asking the right question before measurements matters? Environ Pollut. 2017;231(Pt 2):1256–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.074.

Käppler A, Fischer D, Oberbeckmann S, Schernewski G, Labrenz M, Eichhorn K-J, et al. Analysis of environmental microplastics by vibrational microspectroscopy: FTIR, Raman or both? Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408(29):8377–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-9956-3.

Fischer M, Scholz-Böttcher BM. Microplastics analysis in environmental samples recent pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method improvements to increase the reliability of mass-related data. Anal Methods. 2019;11(18):2489–97. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ay00600a.

Zobkov MB, Esiukova EE. Evaluation of the Munich plastic sediment separator efficiency in extraction of microplastics from natural marine bottom sediments. Limnol Oceanogr Methods. 2017;15(11):967–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10217.

Enders K, Lenz R, Stedmon CA, Nielsen TG. Abundance, size and polymer composition of marine microplastics ≥ 10 μm in the Atlantic Ocean and their modelled vertical distribution. Mar Pollut Bull. 2015;100:70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.027.

Löder MGJ, Gerdts G. Methodology Used for the Detection and Identification of Microplastics—A Critical Appraisal. In: Bergmann M, Gutow L, Klages M. (eds) Marine Anthropogenic Litter. Cham: Springer; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_8.

Hurley RR, Lusher AL, Olsen M, Nizzetto L. Validation of a method for extracting microplastics from complex, organic-rich, environmental matrices. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52(13):7409–17. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01517.

Budimir S, Setälä O, Lehtiniemi M. Effective and easy to use extraction method shows low numbers of microplastics in offshore planktivorous fish from the northern Baltic Sea. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018;127:586–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.12.054.

Julienne F, Delorme N, Lagarde F. From macroplastics to microplastics: role of water in the fragmentation of polyethylene. Chemosphere. 2019;236:124409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124409.

Allegra G, Famulari A. Chain statistics in polyethylene crystallization. Polymer. 2009;50(8):1819–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2009.01.063.

Julienne F, Lagarde F, Delorme N. Influence of the crystalline structure on the fragmentation of weathered polyolefines. Polym Degrad Stabil. 2019;170:109012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2019.109012.

Ober CK, Müllen K. Introduction applications of polymers. In: Matyjaszewski K, Möller M. (eds) Polymer science: a comprehensive reference: Elsevier; 2012. p. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53349-4.00199-0.

Enders K, Lenz R, do Sul JAI, Tagg AS, Labrenz M. When every particle matters: a QuEChERS approach to extract microplastics from environmental samples. MethodsX. 2020;7:100784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.100784.

Wang Z, Taylor SE, Sharma P, Flury M. Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0208009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208009.

Lares M, Ncibi MC, Sillanpää M, Sillanpää M. Intercomparison study on commonly used methods to determine microplastics in wastewater and sludge samples. Environ Sci Pollut R. 2019;26(12):12109–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04584-6.

Lenz R, Enders K, Fischer F, Brandt J, Fischer D, Labrenz M. Raman and FTIR spectra used in: Lenz et al. 2021, “Measuring impacts of microplastic treatments via image recognition on immobilised particles below 100 μm”; 2021. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4568683.

Lenz R, Enders K, Fischer F, Brandt J, Fischer D, Labrenz M. ImmobileParticles_MatchAndAnalyse: Python code used for analysis of image data in Lenz et al. 2021, “Measuring impacts of microplastic treatments via image recognition on immobilised particles below 100 μm”; 2021. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4592319.

VanderPlas J, Granger B, Heer J, Moritz D, Wongsuphasawat K, Satyanarayan A, et al. Altair: interactive statistical visualizations for Python. J OSS. 2018;3(32):1057. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01057.

Satyanarayan A, Moritz D, Wongsuphasawat K, Heer J. Vega-lite: a grammar of interactive graphics. IEEE Trans Visual Comp Graphics (Proc InfoVis). 2017;23(1):341–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2016.2599030.

The pandas development team. Pandas-dev/pandas: pandas; 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3509134.

McKinney W. Data structures for statistical computing in Python. In: van der WS, Jarrod M, editors. Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference; 2010. p. 56–61.

Seabold S, Perktold J. Statsmodels: econometric and statistical modeling with Python. In: 9th python in science conference; 2010.

Bradski G. The OpenCV library. Dr Dobb’s J Software Tools. 2000;25:120–5.

Van Der WS, Schönberger JL, Nunez-Iglesias J, Boulogne F, Warner JD, Yager N, et al. scikit-image: Image processing in Python. PeerJ. 2014;2:e453. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.453.

Canny J. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE T Pattern Anal. 1986;PAMI-8(6):679–98. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851.

Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1979;9(1):62–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.1979.4310076.

Statsmodels Contributors. 2021. Statsmodels.org. https://www.statsmodels.org/stable/glm.html. Accessed 29 Jan 2021.

Green PJ. Iteratively reweighted least squares for maximum likelihood estimation, and some robust and resistant alternatives. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1984;46(2):149–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1984.tb01288.x.

Lenz R, Enders K, Stedmon CA, Mackenzie DMA, Nielsen TG. A critical assessment of visual identification of marine microplastic using Raman spectroscopy for analysis improvement. Mar Pollut Bull. 2015;100(1):82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.026.

Zouboulis E, Renusch D, Grimsditch M. Advantages of ultraviolet Raman scattering for high temperature investigations. Appl Phys Lett. 1998;72(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.121437.

Butler HJ, Ashton L, Bird B, Cinque G, Curtis K, Dorney J, et al. Using Raman spectroscopy to characterize biological materials. Nat Protoc. 2016;11(4):664–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.036.

Imhof HK, Laforsch C, Wiesheu AC, Schmid J, Anger PM, Niessner R, et al. Pigments and plastic in limnetic ecosystems: a qualitative and quantitative study on microparticles of different size classes. Water Res. 2016;98:64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.015.

Piehl S, Hauk R, Robbe E, Richter B, Kachholz F, Schilling J, et al. Combined approaches to predict microplastic emissions within an urbanized estuary (Warnow, southwestern Baltic Sea). Front Environ Sci. 2021;9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.616765.

Lenz R, Enders K, Fischer F, Brandt J, Fischer D, Labrenz M. Interactive figure for exploration and analysis of the quantitative image data set in Lenz et al. 2021, “Measuring impacts of microplastic treatments via image recognition on immobilised particles below 100 μm”; 2021. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4568524.

de Sousa Menezes M, Queiroz EC, Soares PV, Faria-e-Silva AL, Soares CJ, Martins LRM. Fiber post etching with hydrogen peroxide: effect of concentration and application time. J Endod. 2011;37(3):398–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.037.

Navarro CA, Kedzie EA, Ma Y, Michael KH, Nutt SR, Williams TJ. Mechanism and catalysis of oxidative degradation of fiber-reinforced epoxy composites. Top Catal. 2018;61(7-8):704–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-018-0917-2.

Lenz R, Enders K, Fischer F, Brandt J, Fischer D, Labrenz M. DIC microscopy images used in: Lenz et al. 2021, “Measuring impacts of microplastic treatments via image recognition on immobilised particles below 100 μm”; 2021. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4568488.

Valsesia A, Quarato M, Ponti J, Fumagalli F, Gilliland D, Colpo P. Combining microcavity size selection with Raman microscopy for the characterization of nanoplastics in complex matrices. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79714-z.

Al-Azzawi MSM, Kefer S, Weißer J, Reichel J, Schwaller C, Glas K, et al. Validation of sample preparation methods for microplastic analysis in wastewater matrices reproducibility and standardization. Water. 2020;12(9):2445. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092445.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Tập 1 Số 1

Thông tin tác giả