Measuring depth of academic vocabulary knowledge

Language Teaching Research - Tập 29 Số 5 - Trang 1967-1993 - 2025
John Read1, Thi Ngoc Yen Dang2
1University of Auckland, New Zealand
2University of Leeds, UK

Tóm tắt

In second language (L2) vocabulary studies there is continuing interest in tests of depth of vocabulary knowledge, measuring various aspects of word knowledge other than just the form–meaning link that is the focus of breadth (or size) tests. This study aimed to explore new formats that could be used as diagnostic tools for assessing depth of academic vocabulary knowledge. The participants were 222 first-year students taking a programme of English for academic purposes (EAP) at a university in Vietnam. The depth measure was a newly developed test of a sample of words from Gardner and Davies’ Academic Vocabulary List, including sub-tests on receptive knowledge of synonyms, collocations and word parts. The participants also took the Updated Vocabulary Levels Test as a breadth measure, as well as a translation test. Results showed that most of the students had a relatively limited knowledge of general English vocabulary. There was a moderate correlation between the breadth and depth tests. The students had the best knowledge of synonyms, followed by word parts and then collocations. The collocation and word parts sub-tests included a Not Sure option to discourage blind guessing, and analyses of responses to this option offered useful insights into the students’ test-taking behaviour.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.system.2010.06.013

Alderson J.C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency. Continuum.

Anderson R.C., Freebody P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In Guthrie J.T. (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–177). International Reading Association.

10.1177/0265532209340194

10.1017/CBO9781139524803

Chapelle C.A. (2012). Conceptions of validity. In Fulcher G., Davidson F. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language testing (pp. 21–33). Routledge.

Chui A.S.Y. (2006). A study of the English vocabulary knowledge of university students in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 16, 1–23.

Coxhead A. (2018). Vocabulary and English for Specific Purposes research: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Routledge.

10.1016/j.esp.2018.03.004

10.1093/elt/ccz057

10.1017/9781108774390.019

10.1177/0265532212459028

10.1057/9780230245327_11

10.1093/applin/amt015

10.1093/applin/amy057

10.1057/9780230245327_12

10.4324/9781315657455

10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00058.x

10.1177/0033688208101452

10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00621.x

McLean S. (2021). The coverage comprehension model, its importance to pedagogy and research, and threats to the validity with which it is operationalized. Reading in a Foreign Language, 33, 126–140.

10.1177/0265532219898380

McLean S., Stoeckel T. (2021). Lexical mastery thresholds and lexical units: A reply to Laufer. Reading in a Foreign Language, 33, 247–259.

Meara P. (1997). Towards a new approach in modelling vocabulary learning. In Schmitt N., McCarthy M. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 109–121). Cambridge University Press.

10.1075/lllt.24

10.21832/9781847692092

Milton J. (2013). Measuring the contribution of vocabulary knowledge to proficiency in the four skills. In Bardel C., Lindquist C., Laufer B. (Eds.), L2 vocabulary acquisition, knowledge and use (pp. 57–78). EUROSLA Monograph Series 2. European Second Language Association.

Nation I.S.P. (1983). Testing and teaching vocabulary. Guidelines, 5, 12–25.

10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59

Nation P. (2012). The Vocabulary Size Test. Unpublished manuscript Victoria University of Wellington New Zealand. Available at: https://www.wgtn.ac.nz/lals/resources/paul-nations-resources/vocabulary-tests/the-vocabulary-size-test/Vocabulary-Size-Test-information-and-specifications.pdf (accessed June 2022).

10.1017/CBO9781139858656

Nation I.S.P. (2020). The BNC/COCA Level 6 word family lists. Unpublished paper. Available at: https://www.wgtn.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/1857641/about-bnc-coca-vocabulary-list.pdf (accessed June 2022).

10.1075/z.233

10.1177/0033688210390264

10.1177/1362168816639619

10.1598/RRQ.42.2.4

10.1016/j.jeap.2019.02.004

10.3138/cmlr.56.2.282

10.1177/003368828801900202

10.1177/026553229301000308

Read J. (1998). Validating a test to measure depth of vocabulary knowledge. In Kunnan A. (Ed.), Validation in language assessment (pp. 41–60). Erlbaum.

10.1075/lllt.10.15rea

Read J. (2013). Reflecting on the validity of vocabulary assessments. Paper presented at the Vocab@Vic Conference, December 2013, Victoria University of Wellington.

10.1177/1362168815586083

10.1111/1467-9922.00042

10.1111/lang.12077

10.1017/S0261444812000018

10.2307/3588328

10.1177/026553220101800103

10.1017/S0261444819000326

10.1002/tesq.325

10.1017/S027226312000025X

10.1016/j.system.2020.102279

10.1093/applin/14.4.344

10.1017/S0272263105050023

10.1093/applin/aml048

10.1075/itl.168.1.02web

10.3138/cmlr.53.1.13

10.1016/j.system.2006.12.009

10.1186/s40862-017-0024-0

10.1111/flan.12225

10.1177/1362168820913998

10.1177/0033688216639761

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Language Teaching Research

Tập 29 Số 5

1967-1993

Thông tin tác giả