Measuring Numeracy without a Math Test: Development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale

Medical Decision Making - Tập 27 Số 5 - Trang 672-680 - 2007
Angela Fagerlin1, Brian J. Zikmund‐Fisher1, Peter A. Ubel2, Aleksandra Janković3, Holly A. Derry3, Dylan Smith1
1VA Health Services Research & Development Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Center for Behavioral and Decision Sciences in Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan,
2VA Health Services Research & Development Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Center for Behavioral and Decision Sciences in Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
3Center for Behavioral and Decision Sciences in Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Tóm tắt

Background. Basic numeracy skills are necessary before patients can understand the risks of medical treatments. Previous research has used objective measures, similar to mathematics tests, to evaluate numeracy. Objectives. To design a subjective measure (i.e., self-assessment) of quantitative ability that distinguishes low- and high-numerate individuals yet is less aversive, quicker to administer, and more useable for telephone and Internet surveys than existing numeracy measures. Research Design. Paper-and-pencil questionnaires. Subjects. The general public (N = 703) surveyed at 2 hospitals. Measures. Forty-nine subjective numeracy questions were compared to measures of objective numeracy. Results. An 8-item measure, the Subjective Numeracy Scale (SNS), was developed through several rounds of testing. Four items measure people's beliefs about their skill in performing various mathematical operations, and 4 measure people's preferences regarding the presentation of numerical information. The SNS was significantly correlated with Lipkus and others' objective numeracy scale (correlations: 0.63—0.68) yet was completed in less time (24 s/item v. 31 s/item, P < 0.05) and was perceived as less stressful (1.62 v. 2.69, P < 0.01) and less frustrating (1.92 v. 2.88, P < 0.01). Fifty percent of participants who completed the SNS volunteered to participate in another study, whereas only 8% of those who completed the Lipkus and others scale similarly volunteered (odds ratio = 11.00, 95% confidence interval = 2.14—56.65). Conclusions. The SNS correlates well with mathematical test measures of objective numeracy but can be administered in less time and with less burden. In addition, it is much more likely to leave participants willing to participate in additional research and shows much lower rates of missing or incomplete data.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Kirsch IS, 1993, Adult literacy in America: a first look at the results of the National Adult Literacy Survey (NCES 93275)

10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00242.x

10.2105/AJPH.87.6.1027

10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.21130.x

10.2105/AJPH.92.8.1278

10.7326/0003-4819-127-11-199712010-00003

10.1177/0272989X0102100505

10.1177/0272989X0002000306

10.1093/jnci/87.10.720

10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00466.x

10.1177/0272989X0102100105

10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00116-5

10.1007/BF02640361

10.1001/archinte.158.2.166

10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00239-2

10.1097/00005650-200205000-00005

SAS Statistical Software, Inc. [computer program]. Version 8.0. Cary, NC: SAS Institute ; 2000.

Pedhazur EJ, 1997, Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research, 3

10.1177/0272989X07303824

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Medical Decision Making

Tập 27 Số 5

672-680

Thông tin tác giả