Measurement Properties of the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale in an Australian Allied Health Student Cohort

Health Professions Education - Tập 5 - Trang 275-280 - 2019
Brett Vaughan1,2
1Department of Medical Education, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Level 7 North, Medical Building, Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
2School of Health & Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Lismore, Australia

Tài liệu tham khảo

World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Geneva, Switzerland; 2010. Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative, 2012 Thannhauser, 2010, Measures of interprofessional education and collaboration, J Interprof Care, 24, 336, 10.3109/13561820903442903 Luecht, 1990, Assessing professional perceptions: design and validation of an interdisciplinary education perception scale, J Allied Health, 19, 181 Hawk, 2002, Health professions students׳ perceptions of interprofessional relationships, Acad Med, 77, 354, 10.1097/00001888-200204000-00020 Goelen, 2006, Measuring the effect of interprofessional problem‐based learning on the attitudes of undergraduate health care students, Med Educ, 40, 555, 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02478.x Baker, 2008, Simulation in interprofessional education for patient‐centred collaborative care, J Adv Nurs, 64, 372, 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04798.x McFadyen, 2007, The Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS): an alternative remodelled sub-scale structure and its reliability, J Interprof Care, 21, 433, 10.1080/13561820701352531 Williams, 2012, Examining the measurement properties of the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS) in paramedic education, Nurse Educ Today, 33, 981, 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.10.015 Leitch, 2013, Exploring psychometric properties of the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale in health graduate students, J Interprof Care, 28, 52, 10.3109/13561820.2013.820691 Vaughan, 2014, The Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS): which factor structure?, Educ Med J, 6, 3, 10.5959/eimj.v6i3.259 Oates, 2015, A critical appraisal of instruments to measure outcomes of interprofessional education, Med Educ, 49, 386, 10.1111/medu.12681 R: A language and environment for statistical computing [computer program]. Version 3.2.2. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015. psych; Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research [computer program]. Version 1.5.8. Evanston, Illinois, USA: Northwestern University; 2015. Andrich, 2010 da Rocha, 2013, An introduction to Rasch analysis for psychiatric practice and research, J Psychiatr Res, 47, 141, 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.09.014 Pallant, 2007, An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Br J Clin Psychol, 46, 1, 10.1348/014466506X96931 Retief, 2013, The usefulness of the Rasch model for the refinement of Likert scale questionnaires, Afr J Res Math, Sci Technol Educ, 17, 126, 10.1080/10288457.2013.828407 Lamoureux, 2007, The impact of vision impairment questionnaire: an assessment of its domain structure using confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis, Investigative Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 48, 1001, 10.1167/iovs.06-0361 Brodersen, 2007, Methodological aspects of differential item functioning in the Rasch model, J Med Econ, 10, 309, 10.3111/13696990701557048 Andrich, 2014, Real and artificial differential item functioning in polytomous items, Educ Psychol Meas, 75, 185, 10.1177/0013164414534258 Hagquist, 2008, Psychometric properties of the PsychoSomatic Problems scale: a Rasch analysis on adolescent data, Social Indic Res, 86, 511, 10.1007/s11205-007-9186-3 Hagell, 2015, Testing Unidimensionality Using the PCA/t-test Protocol with the Rasch Model: a Cautionary Note, Rasch Meas Trans, 28, 1487 binom: Binomial Confidence Intervals For Several Parameterizations [computer program]. Version 1.1-1 2015. Green, 2015, Evaluation of dimensionality in the assessment of internal consistency reliability: coefficient alpha and omega coefficients, Educ Meas: Issues Pract, 34, 14, 10.1111/emip.12100 userfriendlyscience: Quantitative analysis made accessible [computer program]. Version 0.3-0 2015. Zinbarg, 2005, Cronbach׳s α, Revelle׳s β, and McDonald׳s ω H: their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability, Psychometrika., 70, 123, 10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7 Hermsen, 2013, Exploring the aggregation of four functional measures in a population of older adults with joint pain and comorbidity, BMC Geriatr, 13, 119, 10.1186/1471-2318-13-119 Revelle, 1979, Hierarchical cluster analysis and the internal structure of tests, Multivar Behav Res, 14, 57, 10.1207/s15327906mbr1401_4 Orrock, 2009, Profile of members of the Australian Osteopathic Association: part 1 The practitioners, Int J Osteopath Med, 12, 14, 10.1016/j.ijosm.2008.04.002 Orrock, 2015, Allied Health practitioners׳ role in the Chronic Disease Management program: the experience of osteopathic practitioners, Int J Osteopath Med, 18, 97, 10.1016/j.ijosm.2014.04.009 Bell, 2014, The (stalled) progress of interprofessional collaboration: the role of gender, J Interprof Care, 28, 98, 10.3109/13561820.2013.851073 Revelle, 2009, Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: comments on Sijtsma, Psychometrika., 74, 145, 10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z