Mathematics learning as embodied making: primary students’ investigation of 3D geometry with handheld 3D printing technology
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abrahamson, D., & Bakker, A. (2016). Making sense of movement in embodied design for mathematics learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 33.
Alibali, M. A., & Nathan, M. J. (2011). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247–286.
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.
Burte, H., Gardony, A. L., Hutton, A., & Taylor, H. A. (2017). Think3d!: Improving mathematics learning through embodied spatial training. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0052-9
Chu, S., Quek, F., Saenz, M., Bhangaonkar, S., & Okundaye, O. (2015). Enabling instrumental interaction through electronics making: Effects on children’s storytelling. In H. Schoenau-Fog, L. Bruni, S. Louchart, & S. Baceviciute (Eds.), Interactive storytelling (pp. 329–337). Springer International Publishing.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young Children. Routledge.
Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition, 106, 1047–1058.
de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Fleming, L. (2015). Worlds of making: Best practices for establishing a makerspace for your school. Corwin.
Godhea, A. L., Liljaa, P., & Selwyn, N. (2019). Making sense of making: Critical issues in the integration of maker education into schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1610040
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Cook, S. W. (2012). Gesture in thought. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 631–649). Oxford University Press.
Gulliksen, M. S. (2017). Making matters? Unpacking the role of practical aesthetic making activities in the general education through the theoretical lens of embodied learning. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1415108.
Hall, R., & Nemirovsky, R. (2012). Modalities of body engagement in mathematical activity and learning [special issue]. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 207–215.
Hallowell, D. A., Okamoto, Y., Romo, L. F., & La Joy, J. R. (2015). First-graders’ spatial-mathematical reasoning about plane and solid shapes and their representations. ZDM, 47(3), 363–375.
Halverson, E., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84, 495–504.
Hershkowitz, R. (1989). Visualization in geometry—two sides of the coin. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11, 61–76.
Hong Kong Curriculum Development Council. (2015). Ongoing renewal of the school curriculum—focusing, deepening and sustaining updating the mathematics education key learning area curriculum (primary 1 to secondary 6). The Printing Department.
Krause, C. (2016). The mathematics in our hands: How gestures contribute to constructing mathematical knowledge. Springer.
Laborde, C. (2008). Experiencing the multiple dimensions of mathematics with dynamic 3D geometry environments: Illustration with Cabri 3D. The Electronic Journal of Mathematics and Technology, 2(1), 1–10.
Mix, K. S., & Cheng, Y. L. (2012). The relation between space and math: Developmental and educational implications. Advances in Child Development and Behaviour, 42, 197–243.
Moreno-Armella, L., & Brady, C. (2018). Technological supports for mathematical thinking and learning: Coaction and designing to democratize access to powerful ideas. In L. Ball, P. Drijvers, S. Ladel, H. S. Siller, M. Tabach, & C. Vale (Eds.), Uses of technology in upper secondary mathematics education: ICME-13 monographs (pp. 339–350). Springer.
Nemirovsky, R., Kelton, M. L., & Rhodehamel, B. (2013). Playing mathematical instruments: Emerging perceptuomotor integration with an interactive mathematics exhibit. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(2), 372–415.
Nemirovsky, R., Ferrara, F., Ferrari, G., & Adamuz-Povedano, N. (2020). Body motion, early algebra, and the colours of abstraction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104, 261–283.
Ng, O., & Chan, T. (2019). Learning as making: Using 3D computer-aided design to enhance the learning of shapes and space in STEM-integrated ways. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12643
Ng, O., & Ferrara, F. (2020). Towards a materialist vision of ‘learning as making’: The case of 3D Printing Pens in school mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 925–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10000-9
Ng, O., Shi, L., & Ting, F. (2020). Exploring differences in primary students’ geometry learning outcomes in two technology-enhanced environments: Dynamic geometry and 3D Printing. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00244-1
Ng, O., Sinclair, N., & Davis, B. (2018). Drawing off the page: How new 3D technologies provide insight into cognitive and pedagogical assumptions about mathematics. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 15(3), 563–578.
Núñez, R. (2006). Do real numbers really move? Language, thought, and gesture: The embodied cognitive foundations of mathematics. In R. Hersh (Ed.), 18 Unconventional essays on the nature of mathematics. Springer.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, Inc.
Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1–11). Ablex Publishing.
Radford, L. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 111–126.
Roth, W. M. (2016). Growing-making mathematics: A dynamic perspective on people, materials, and movement in classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(1), 87–103.
Roth, W. M., & Mahuex, J. F. (2015). The stakes of movement: A dynamic approach to mathematical thinking. Curriculum Inquiry, 45(3), 266–284.
Shapiro, L. (2011). Embodied cognition. Routledge.
Simon, L. M., & Cox, D. C. (2019). The role of prototyping in mathematical design thinking. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 56, 100724.
Sinclair, N., de Freitas, E., & Ferrara, F. (2013). Virtual encounters: The murky and furtive world of mathematical inventiveness. ZDM, 45, 239–252.
Sinclair, N., & Robutti, O. (2014). Teaching practices in digital environments. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education SE-153 (pp. 598–601). Springer.
Singer, M. A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Children learn when their teacher’s gestures and speech differ. Psychological Science, 16(2), 85–89.
Stylianides, A., & Stylianides, G. (2013). Seeking research-grounded solutions to problems of practice: Classroom-based interventions in mathematics education. ZDM: the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(3), 333–342.
Vossoughi, S., Hooper, P. K., & Escudé, M. (2016). Making through the lens of culture and power: Toward transformative visions for educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 206–232.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.