Toán học và giáo dục STEM liên ngành: những phát triển gần đây và hướng đi trong tương lai
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
#Toán học #giáo dục STEM #giáo dục liên ngành #phản biện giáo dục #thành công của học sinhTài liệu tham khảo
*Abboud, M., Hoppenot, P., & Rollinde, E. (2019). Enhancing mathematics and science learning through the use of a human orrery. In U. T. Jankvist, M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the eleventh congress of the european society for research in mathematics education (pp. 4721–4728). Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME.
*Anderson, J., & Tully, D. (2021). Factors which sustain integrated STEM curriculum approaches in secondary school settings. In D. Anderson, M. Milner-Bolotin, R. Santos, & S. Petrina (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International STEM in Education Conference (STEM 2021) (pp. 20–26). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, July 5–9. University of British Columbia. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0402129
Anderson, J., English, L., Fitzallen, N., & Symons, D. (2020). The contribution of mathematics education researchers to the current STEM education agenda. In J. Way, C. Attard, J. Anderson, J. Bobis, H. McMaster, & K. Cartwright (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2016–2019 (pp. 27–57). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4269-5_3
Anderson, J., Holmes, K., Tully, D., & Williams, G. (2017). STEM professional learning: Evaluating secondary school teachers’ and students’ experiences. In A. Downton, S. Livy, & J. Hall (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 586–603). MERGA.
*Anderson, J., & Katrak, Z. (2017). Higher order thinking, engagement and connectedness in lessons based on STEM contexts. In B. Kaur, W. K. Ho, T. L. Toh, & B. H. Choy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 97–104). PME.
*Anderson, J., & Tully, D. (2020). Designing and evaluating an integrated STEM professional development program for secondary and primary school teachers in Australia. In J. Anderson & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated approaches to STEM education (pp. 403–425). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_22
*Anderson, J., Wilson, K., Tully, D., & Way, J. (2019). “Can we build the wind powered car again?” Students’ and teachers’ responses to a new integrated STEM curriculum. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 5(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2019.61
*Arnone, K., & Hanuscin, D. (2019). An exploratory cross-sectional survey study of elementary teachers’ conceptions and methods of STEM integration. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 4(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2018.43
*Aydeniz, M., & Bilican, K. (2018). The impact of engagement in STEM activities on primary pre-service teachers’ conceptualization of STEM and knowledge of STEM pedagogy. Journal for Research in STEM Education, 4(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2018.46
*Baldinger, E., Staats, S., Clarkson, L., Gullickson, E., Norman, F., & Akoto, B. (2020). A review of conceptions of secondary mathematics in integrated STEM education: Returning voice to the silent M. In J. Anderson & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated approaches to STEM education (pp. 67–90). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_5
*Beswick, K., & Fraser, S. (2019). Developing mathematics teachers’ 21st century competence for teaching in STEM contexts. ZDM, 51(6), 955–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01084-2
*Bock, W., Bracke, M., & Capraro, P. (2019). Mathematical modeling of musical fountains and light organs - Where is the M in interdisciplinary STEM projects? In U. T. Jankvist, M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 4739–4746). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME.
Breiner, J., Jarkness, S., Johnson, C., & Koehler, C. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
*Brown, R. E., & Bogiages, C. A. (2018). Professional development through STEM integration: How early career math and science teachers respond to experiencing integrated STEM tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9863-x
*Chorney, S., & Lin, A. (2021). Animating the inquiry process on climate change through learning of mathematical and communicative literacies. In D. Anderson, M. Milner-Bolotin, R. Santos, & S. Petrina (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International STEM in Education Conference (STEM 2021) (pp. 94–99). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, July 5–9. University of British Columbia. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0402129
*Conner, A., Crawford, B., Foutz, T., Hill, R., Jackson, D., Kim, C., & Thompson, S. (2020). Argumentation in primary grades STEM instruction: Examining teachers’ beliefs and practices in the USA. In J. Anderson & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated approaches to STEM education (pp. 427–446). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_23
*Costa, M., & Domingos, A. (2019). Promoting mathematics teaching in the framework of STEM integration. In U. T. Jankvist, M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 4749–4756). Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME.
*Costa, M., Domingos, A., & Teodoro, V. (2020). Promoting integrated STEM tasks in the framework of teachers’ professional development in Portugal. In J. Anderson & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated approaches to STEM education (pp. 511–532). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_27
*Coxon, S. V., Dohrman, R. L., & Nadler, D. R. (2018). Children using robotics for engineering, science, technology, and math (CREST-M): The development and evaluation of an engaging math curriculum. Roeper Review, 40(2), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1434711
*den Braber, N., Kruger, J., Mazereeuw, M., & Kuiper, W. (2019). Reflecting on the value of mathematics in an interdisciplinary STEM course. In U. T. Jankvist, M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 4757–4764). Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME.
Department of Education and Skills, Ireland (2017). STEM education policy statement 2017–2026. Retrieved 11 December 2017 from https://www.education.ie/en/The-Education-System/STEM-Education-Policy/stem-education-policy-statement-2017-2026-.pdf
*Dickes, A., Farris, V., & Sengupta, P. (2020). Sociomathematical norms for integrating coding and modeling with elementary science: A dialogical approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09795-7
Doig, B., Williams, J., Swanson, D., Borromeo Ferri, R., & Drake, P. (Eds.). (2019). Interdisciplinary mathematics education: The state of the art and beyond. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11066-6
Education Bureau of Government of Hong Kong SAR. (2016). Report on promotion of STEM education: Unleashing potential in innovation. Retrieved from https://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/renewal/STEM%20Education%20Report_Eng.pdf
English, L. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
European Schoolnet. (2017). STEM education. http://www.eun.org/focus-areas/stem
*Evans, P., Dillard, K., Rodriguez-Wilhelm, D., & McAlister-Shields, L. (2019). Like-minded people: University-based interdisciplinary collaborations in STEM teacher preparation programs. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2, 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00011-0
*Falloon, G., Stevenson, M., Beswick, K., Fraser, S., & Geiger, V. (2021). Building STEM in schools: An Australian cross-case analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 110–122. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48629249
Fitzallen, N. (2015). STEM education: What does mathematics have to offer? In M. Marshman, V. Geiger, & A. Bennison (Eds.), Mathematics education in the margins (Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 237–244). MERGA.
*Fitzallen, N., Wright, S., & Watson, J. (2019). Focusing on data: Year 5 students making STEM connections. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2019.60
Furley, P., & Goldschmied, N. (2021). Systematic vs. narrative reviews in sport and exercise psychology: Is either approach superior to the other? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 685082. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685082
*Galanti, T. M., & Holincheck, N. (2022). Beyond content and curriculum in elementary classrooms: Conceptualizing the cultivation of integrated STEM teacher identity. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00358-8
*Gao, X., Li, P., Shen, J., & Sun, H. (2020). Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00225-4
Goos, M., & Bennison, A. (2018). Boundary crossing and brokering between disciplines in pre-service mathematics teacher education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30, 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0232-4
*Henriques, A., Oliveira, H., & Baptista, M. (2020). Promoting a learning scenario for an integrated approach to STEM: Prospective teachers’ perspectives in Portugal. In J. Anderson & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated approaches to STEM education (pp. 385–402). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_21
*Hernández-Zavaleta, J., Becker, S., Clark, D., Brady, C., & Major, N. (2021). Students’ computational thinking in two mathematics block-based programming environments: Research during Covid-19. In D. Anderson, M. Milner-Bolotin, R. Santos, & S. Petrina (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International STEM in Education Conference (STEM 2021) (pp.208–215). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, July 5–9. University of British Columbia. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0402129
Hobbs, L., Clark, J. C., & Plant, B. (2018). Successful students – STEM program: Teacher learning through a multifaceted vision for STEM education. In R. Jorgensen & K. Larkin (Eds.), STEM education in the junior secondary: The state of play (pp. 133–168). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5448-8_8
Hobbs, L., Doig, B., & Plant, B. (2019). The successful students STEM project: A medium scale case study. In B. Doig, J. Williams, D. Swanson, R. Borromeo Ferri, & P. Drake (Eds.), Interdisciplinary mathematics education: State of the art and beyond (pp. 209–228). Springer Open. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11066-6_13
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, A. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612
Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2020). Online seminar series on programming in mathematics education. (C. Bateau, & G. Gadanidis, Eds.) Retrieved August 2, 2023, from Mathematics Knowledge Network: http://mkn-rcm.ca/online-seminar-series-on-programming-in-mathematics-education/
Ingvarson, L., Schwille, J., Tatto, M., Rowley, G., Peck, R., & Senk, S. (2013). An analysis of teacher education context, structure, and quality-assurance arrangements in TEDS-M countries. IEA. https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/2019-04/TEDS-M_Findings.pdf
Just, J., & Siller, H. (2022). The role of mathematics in STEM secondary classrooms: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 12, 629. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12090629
*Kelana, J. B., Wardani, D. S., Firdaus, A. R., Altaftazani, D. H., & Rahayu, G. D. S. (2020). The effect of STEM approach on the mathematics literacy ability of elementary school teacher education students. Journal of Physics. Conference Series, 1657(1), 12006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012006
Kelley, T., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
*Kim, Y. R., Park, M. S., & Tjoe, H. (2021). Discovering concepts of geometry through robotics coding activities. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(3), 406–425. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1205
Lane, C., Kaya-Capocci, S., Kelly, R., O’Connell, T., & Goos, M. (2022). Fascinating or dull? Female students’ attitudes towards STEM subjects and careers. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.959972
*Lee, Y., Capraro, R. M., & Bicer, A. (2019). Affective mathematics engagement: A comparison of STEM PBL versus non-STEM PBL instruction. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 19(3), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-019-00050-0
Leung, A. (2018). Pólya’s problem solving cycle as a boundary object for the STEM disciplines’ inquiry processes. In Integrated education for the real world (Post-conference proceedings of the 5th International STEM in Education Conference, pp. 205–212). Queensland University of Technology, November 21–23.
*Leung, A. (2020). Boundary crossing pedagogy in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00212-9
*Leung, A. (2021). Realizing STEM heuristic in a mathematics problem solving activity. In D. Anderson, M. Milner-Bolotin, R. Santos, & S. Petrina (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International STEM in Education Conference (STEM 2021) (pp.242–248). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, July 5–9. University of British Columbia. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0402129
Li, Y. (2022). Eight years of development in welcoming and engaging diverse scholars to share and promote STEM education research worldwide. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00385-5
*Li, Y., & Anderson, J. (2020). Focusing on students and their experiences in and through integrated STEM education. In J. Anderson & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated approaches to STEM education (pp. 177–183). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_10
Li, Y., Froyd, J., & Wang, K. (2019). Learning about research and readership development in STEM education: A systematic analysis of the journal’s publications from 2014 to 2018. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0176-1
Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. (2022). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6
*Liu, J., & Zhang, Q. (2021). Rethinking authentic assessment in mathematics education: A holistic review. In M. Inprasitha, N. Changsri, & N. Boonsena (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 206–213). PME.
*Lockwood, E., DeChenne, A., & Valdes-Fernandez, S. (2019). Affordances of solving counting problems in a computational environment. In M. Graven, H. Venkat, A. Essien, & P. Vale (Eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 41–48). PME.
*Maass, K., Geiger, V., Romero Ariza, M., & Goos, M. (2019). The role of mathematics in interdisciplinary STEM education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51(6), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01100-5
*Margot, K., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
*Mayes, R., Rittschof, K., Gallant, B., & Martin, C. (2017). Real STEM: An interdisciplinary STEM program. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 3(1/2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2017.26
Namukasa, I. K., Hughes, J., & Scucuglia, R. (2022). STEAM and critical making in teacher education. In M. Danesi (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive mathematics (Vol. 2, pp. 939–970). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44982-7_15-1
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9822
National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf
Office of the Chief Scientist. (2014). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Australia’s future. Australian Government.
*Oliveira, H., Henriques, A., & Baptista, M. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ perspectives on the role of statistics in a learning scenario for promoting STEM integration. In U. T. Jankvist, M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 4783–4790). Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME.
Pei, C., Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2018). Cultivating computational thinking practices and mathematical habits of mind in Lattice Land. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1403543
*Preciado-Babb, A., & Friesen, S. (2021). Does school mathematics support STEM education? Exploring specialised mathematics knowledge for STEM education. In D. Anderson, M. Milner-Bolotin, R. Santos, & S. Petrina (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International STEM in Education Conference (STEM 2021) (pp.331–336). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, July 5–9. University of British Columbia. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0402129
*Rabin, J. M., Burgasser, A., Bussey, T. J., Eggers, J., Lo, S., Seethaler, S., Stevens, L., & Weizman, H. (2021). Interdisciplinary conversations in STEM education: Can faculty understand each other better than their students do? International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00266-9
*Raymond, K. (2018). M is not just for STEM: How myths about the purposes of mathematics education have narrowed mathematics curricula in the United States. Education Sciences, 8(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020047
*Reinholz, D., Slominski, T., French, T., Pazicni, S., Rasmussen, C., & McCoy, B. (2018). Good problems within and across disciplines. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 4(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2018.34
Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Ring-Whalen, E. (2021). Beyond the basics: A detailed conceptual framework of integrated STEM. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00041-y
*Shernoff, D., Sinha, S., Bressler, D., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1
*Shriki, A., & Lavy, I. (2017). Mathematics and sciences teachers collaboratively design interdisciplinary lesson plans: A possible reality or wishful thinking? In B. Kaur, W. K. Ho, T. L. Toh, & B. H. Choy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 201–208). PME.
Sinclair, N., & Patterson, M. (2018). The dynamic geometrisation of computer programming. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1403541
*Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., Maat, S. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2020). The effect of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) program on students’ achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), em0549. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5885
*Steffensen, L. (2020). Climate change and students; critical competencies: A Norwegian study. In J. Anderson & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated approaches to STEM education (pp. 271–293). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_15
*Stohlmann, M. (2020). STEM integration for high school mathematics teachers. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 6(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2020.71
Sutton, A., Clowes, M., Preston, L., & Booth, A. (2019). Meeting the review family: Exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 36, 202–222.
*Thom, J., Nicol, C., Fritzlan, A., Francis, K., Glanfield, F., & Ghostkeeper, E. (2021). Re-storying the M in STEM: How mathematics education might/can shape STEM and STEM education. In D. Anderson, M. Milner-Bolotin, R. Santos, & S. Petrina (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International STEM in Education Conference (STEM 2021) (pp.375–380). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, July 5–9. University of British Columbia. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0402129
*Touitou, I., Schneider, B., & Krajcik, J. (2020). Incorporating mathematical thinking and engineering design into high school STEM physics: A case study. In J. Anderson & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated approaches to STEM education (pp. 313–329). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_17
*Tytler, R. (2020). STEM education for the twenty-first century. In J. Anderson & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated approaches to STEM education (pp. 21–43). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_3
Ubuz, B., Stephan, M. Cascella, C., & Den Braber, N. (2022). Introduction to the papers of TWG26: Mathematics in the context of STEM education. In J. Hodgen, E. Geraniou, G. Bolondi, & F. Ferretti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME12). (pp. 4536–4542). Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Italy and ERME.
*Ubuz, B., Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., & Capraro, P. (2019). Introduction to TWG26: Mathematics in the context of STEM education. In U. T. Jankvist, M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME11) (pp. 4713–4720). Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME.
Vasquez, J., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3–8: Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Heinemann.
*Walker, L. H., & Sherman, H. J. (2017). Common core and STEM opportunities. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 14(1–3), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1405
Watson, A., & Ohtani, M. (Eds.). (2015). Task design in mathematics education: An ICMI Study 22. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09629-2_1
*Watson, J., Fitzallen, N., & Chick, H. (2020). What is the role of statistics in integrating STEM education? In J. Anderson & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated approaches to STEM education (pp. 91–115). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_6