Mate Choice for Non‐siblings in Wild House Mice: Evidence from a Choice Test and a Reproductive Test
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bateson P., 1983, Mate Choice, 257
Blaustein A. R., 1987, Kin Recognition in Animals, 287
Blaustein A. R., 1987, Kin Recognition in Animals, 333
Deckard B. S., 1989, Behavioral and reproductive differences in mice as a function of inbreeding, Behav. Genet., 19, 433, 10.1007/BF01066169
Dewsbury D. A., 1982, Avoidance of incestuous breeding between siblings in two species of Peromyscus mice, Biol. Behav., 7, 157
Dudine B., 1981, Olfactory preferences of inbred mice (Mus musculus) for their own strain and for siblings: effects of strain, sex and cross‐fostering, Behaviour, 78, 314, 10.1163/156853981X00374
Fletcher D. J. C., 1987, Kin Recognition in Animals
Lamming G. E., 1984, Marshall's Physiology of Reproduction. Vol. I. Reproductive Cycles of Vertebrates
Kareem A. M., 1988, Analysis of a genetic recognition system in wild house mice, Behav. Genet., 18, 549, 10.1007/BF01065521
Lidicker W. Z., 1976, Social behaviour and density regulation in house mice living in large enclosure, J. Anim. Ecol., 45, 677, 10.2307/3575
SAS Inst. Inc., 1986, SUGI Supplemental Library User's Guide
Shields W. M., 1982, Philopatry, inbreeding, and the evolution of sex
Siegel S., 1956, Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Templeton A. R., 1986, Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, 105
Thomas K. J., 1987, Male‐induced implantation failure (the Bruce effect) in laboratory mice: investigations on the olfactory memory of the newly inseminated female, Arch. Biol., 98, 263
Van Der Gulden W. J., 1975, Versuchstierkunde und Versuchstechnik
Wright S., 1977, Evolution and the Genetics of Populations: Vol. III. Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions
Kareem A. M., 1976, Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex, J. Exp. Med., 144, 1324, 10.1084/jem.144.5.1324
Kareem A. M., 1979, Recognition among mice. Evidence from the use of a Y‐maze differentially scented by congenic mice of different major histocompatibility types, J. Exp. Med., 150, 755, 10.1084/jem.150.4.755