Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Theo dõi tiến trình điều trị tội phạm tình dục trẻ em với FoSOD: Sự từ chối và các lời giải thích về trách nhiệm
Tóm tắt
Một thách thức liên tục trong điều trị các tội phạm tình dục là xác định các công cụ đo lường có thể được sử dụng để theo dõi tiến trình điều trị. Bài báo này cung cấp bằng chứng rằng Thang đo Các khía cạnh của sự từ chối của tội phạm tình dục (FoSOD; phát âm là “façade”) ánh xạ các khía cạnh quan trọng của tiến trình điều trị, nhưng đồng thời tránh các vấn đề thường gặp liên quan đến các biện pháp tự báo cáo. Năm mươi ba kẻ xâm hại trẻ em đã hoàn thành FoSOD hai lần với khoảng cách 18 tháng giữa các lần thực hiện. Điểm FoSOD tại Thời điểm 1 và Thời điểm 2 đã được phân tích dựa trên sự tiến bộ trong chương trình điều trị tội phạm tình dục được tòa án phê duyệt. Kết quả cho thấy không chỉ sự tiến bộ trong điều trị tương ứng với những thay đổi có thể đoán được trong điểm FoSOD, mà còn các điểm thành phần của FoSOD, đại diện cho sự từ chối liên quan đến việc phủ nhận, tối thiểu hóa và phi nhân cách hóa hành vi phạm tội, đã tiết lộ các mẫu quan trọng cho thấy những vấn đề mà các tội phạm gặp phải ở các giai đoạn khác nhau trong quá trình điều trị. Những kết quả này được thảo luận trong một khung khái niệm nhận thức mối quan hệ giữa sự từ chối ở các hình thức khác nhau và các lời giải thích mà các tội phạm phát triển để giới hạn trách nhiệm của họ đối với các hành vi bị cáo buộc, cũng như các suy nghĩ hoặc hành vi liên quan và thiên hướng lệch lạc.
Từ khóa
#tội phạm tình dục #điều trị #sự từ chối #trách nhiệm #FoSODTài liệu tham khảo
Anderson, C. A. (1982). Inoculation and counter-explanation: Debiasing techniques in the perseverance of social theories. Social Cognition, 1, 126-139.
Anderson, C. A., & Sechler, E. S. (1986). Effects of explanation and counter-explanation on the development and use of social theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 24-34.
ATSA Professional Issues Committee (2001). Practice standards and guidelines for members of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. Beaverton, OR: Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers.
Barbaree, H. E. (1991). Denial and minimization among sex offenders: Assessment and treatment outcome. Forum on Corrections Research, 3, 30-33.
Barbaree, H. E. (1997). Evaluating treatment efficacy with sexual offenders: The insensitivity of recidivism studies to treatment effects. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9(2).
Barbaree, H. E., & Cortoni, F. (1993). Treatment of the juvenile sex offender within the criminal justice and mental health systems. In H. E. Barbaree, W. L. Marshall, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (pp. 243-263). New York: Guilford.
Barrett, M. J., Sykes, C., & Byrnes, W. (1986). A systemic model for the treatment of intra-family child sexual abuse. In T. Trepper & M. J. Barrett (Eds), Treating incest: A multiple systems perspective (pp. 67-82). New York: Haworth Press.
Brake, S. C., & Shannon, D. (1997). Using pretreatment to increase admission in sex offenders. In The sex offender: New insights, treatment innovations and legal developments (Vol. 2).
Bumby, K. M. (1996). Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: Development and validation of the MOLEST and RAPE scales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 37-54.
Clark, T., & Erooga, M. (1994). Group work with men who sexually abuse children. In T. Morrison, M. Erooga, & R. C. Beckett (Eds.), Sexual offending against children: Assessment and treatment of male abusers (pp. 102-128). London: Routledge.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
Conte, J. R. (1985). Clinical dimensions of adult sexual abuse of children. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 3, 341-354.
Dempster, R. J., & Hart, S. D. (2002). The relative utility of fixed and variable risk factors in discriminating sexual recidivists and nonrecidivists. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 121-138.
Faller, K. C. (1993). Child sexual abuse: Intervention and treatment issues. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Fernandez, Y. M., Marshall, W. L., Lightbody, S., & Sullivan, C. (1999). The Child Molester Empathy Measure: Description and examination of its reliability and validity. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 17-31.
Green, R. (1995). Comprehensive treatment planning for sex offenders. In B. K. Schwartz & H. R. Cellini (Eds.), The sexual offender: Corrections, treatment, and legal practice (pp. 10-1-10-9). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
Hanson, R. K. (1997). How to know what works with sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9(2).
Hanson, R. K. (2000). Treatment outcome and evaluation problems (and solutions). In D. R. Laws, S. M. Hudson, & T. Ward (Eds.), Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders (pp. 485-499). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hanson, R. K., & Bussiere, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
Hanson, R. K., Gizzarelli, R., & Scott, H. (1994). The attitudes of incest offenders: Sexual entitlement and acceptance of sex with children. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 187-202.
Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6-35.
Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2001). A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 105-122.
Happel, R. M., & Auffrey, J. J. (1995). Sex offender assessment: Interrupting the dance of denial. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 13(2), 5-22.
Hirt, E. R., & Sherman, S. J. (1985). The role of prior knowledge in explaining hypothetical events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 519-543.
Hudson, S. M., Wales, D. S., Bakker, L., & Ward, T. (2002). Dynamic risk factors: The Kia Marama evaluation. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 103-119.
Hunter, J. A., & Figueredo, A. J. (1999). Factors associated with treatment compliance in a population of juvenile sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 49-67.
Jenkins, A. (1990). Invitations to responsibility: The therapeutic engagement of men who are violent and abusive (Part I, pp. 12-131; Part II, pp. 150–167). Adeliade, Australia: Dulwich Centre.
Kennedy, H. G., & Grubin, D. H. (1992). Patterns of denial in sex offenders. Psychological Medicine, 22, 191-196.
Knopp, F. H. (1984).Retraining adult sex offenders: Methods and models. Syracuse, NY: Safer Society Press.
Koehler, D. J. (1991). Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 499-519.
Langevin, R. (1988). Defensiveness in sex offenders. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 269-290). New York: Guilford.
Laws, D. R. (1989). Relapse prevention with sex offenders. New York: Guilford.
Lund, C. A. (2000). Predictors of sexual recidivism: Did meta-analysis clarify the role and relevance of denial? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 275-287.
Maletzky, B. M. (1991). Treating the sexual offender. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Maletzky, B. M. (1996). Denial of treatment or treatment of denial? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8(1), 1-5.
Marshall, W. L. (1994). Treatment effects on denial and minimization in incarcerated sex offenders. Behavior Research and Therapy, 32(5), 559-564.
Marshall, W. L., & Barbaree, H. E. (1990). Outcome of comprehensive cognitive-behavioral treatment programs. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories and treatment of the offender (pp. 363-385). New York: Plenum.
Marshall, W. L., & Eccles, A. (1991). Issues in clinical practice with sex offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 68-93.
Marshall, W. L., Laws, D. R., & Barbaree, H. E. (Eds.). (1990). Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender. New York: Plenum.
Marshall, W. L., Thornton, D., Marshall, L. E., Fernandez, Y. M., & Mann, R. (2001). Treatment of sexual offenders who are in categorical denial: A pilot project. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 205-215.
McGrath, M., Cann, S., & Konopasky, R. (1998). New measures of defensiveness, empathy, and cognitive distortions for sexual offenders against children. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 25-36.
Murphy, W. D. (1990). Assessment and modification of cognitive distortions in sex offenders. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 331-342). New York: Plenum.
Nichols, H. R., & Molinder, I. (1984).Multiphasic Sex Inventory manual: A test to assess the psychosexual characteristics of the sexual offender. Tacoma, WA: Author.
O'Donohue, W., & Letourneau, E. (1993). A brief group treatment for the modification of denial in child sexual abusers: Outcome and follow-up. Child Abuse and Neglect, 17, 299-304.
Orlando, D. (1998). Sex offenders. Special Needs Offenders Bulletin, No. 3 (September).
Pollock, N. L., & Hashmall, J. M. (1991). The excuses of child molesters. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 9, 53-59.
Ross, L., Lepper, M. R., & Hubbard, M. (1975). Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 880-892.
Salter, A. C. (1988). Treating child sex offenders and victims. London: Sage.
Schlank, A. M., & Shaw, T. (1996). Treating sexual offenders who deny their guilt: A pilot study. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8(1), 17-23.
Schlank, A. M., & Shaw, T. (1997). Treating sexual offenders who deny—A review. In B. K. Schwartz & H. R. Cellini (Eds.), The sex offender: New insights, treatment innovations and legal developments (Vol. II, pp. 6-1-6-7). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
Schneider, S. L. (2001). In search of realistic optimism: Knowledge, meaning, and warm fuzziness. American Psychologist, 56, 250-263.
Schneider, S. L., & Wright, R. C. (2001). The FoSOD: A measurement tool for re-conceptualizing the role of denial in child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 545-564.
Schneider, S. L., & Wright, R. C. (in press). Understanding denial in sexual offenders: A review of cognitive and motivational processes to avoid responsibility. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse: A Review Journal.
Sewall, K., & Salekin, R. (1997). Understanding and detecting dissimulation in sex offenders. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 328-350). New York: Guilford.
Simourd, D. J., & Malcolm, P. B. (1998). Reliability and validity of the Level of Service Inventory with incarcerated sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 23-28.
Slovic, P., & Fischhoff, B. (1977). On the psychology of experimental surprises. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 544-551.
Thornton, D. (2002). Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 139-153.
Tierney, D. W., & McCabe, M. P. (2002). Motivation for behavior change among sex offenders: A review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 113-129.
Trepper, T., & Barrett, M. J. (1989).Systemic treatment of incest: A therapeutic handbook. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Ward, T., & Hudson, S. M. (2000). A self-regualtion model of relapse prevention. In D. R. Laws, S. M. Hudson, & T. Ward (Eds.), Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders (pp. 79-101). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ward, T., Hudson, S. M., Johnston, L., & Marshall, W. L. (1997). Cognitive distortions in sex offenders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 17(5), 479-507.
Winn, M. E. (1996). The strategic and systemic management of denial in the cognitive/behavioral treatment of sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 25-36.
Wright, R. C., & Schneider, S. L. (1997). Deviant sexual fantasies as motivated self-deception. In B. K. Schwartz & H. R. Cellini (Eds.), The sex offender: New insights, treatment innovations and legal developments (Vol. 2, chap. 8, pp. 8-1-8-14). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
Wright, R. C., & Schneider, S. L. (1999). Motivated self-deception in child molesters. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 8, 89-111.
