Mandatory mediation in Hong Kong: a workable solution based on Australian experiences

China-EU Law Journal - Tập 1 Số 3-4 - Trang 61-96 - 2013
Sarah Elisabeth Hilmer1,2
1GIGA, Institute for Asian Studies, Hamburg, Germany
2Sarah E. Hilmer Consultancy, Hamburg, Germany

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alder E (2004) Mandatory mediation for commercial disputes in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Lawyer 87:87–89

Altobelli T (1996) ADR legislation: some recent developments. Commer Dispute Resolut J 3(1):11

Barlett C (1993) Mediation in the spring offensive 1992. Law Inst J 67(232)

Chinkin CR, Dewdney M (1992) 3 Settlement weeks in New South Wales: an evaluation. ADRJ 90:93

David J (1994) Designing a dispute resolution system. CDRJ 1(26):32–33

Dearlove G (2000) Court-ordered ADR: sanctions for the recalcitrant lawyer and party. ADRJ 12(11):16

DeGaris A (1994) The role of federal court judges in settlement of disputes. Univ Tasmania Law Rev 13(217):224

Golvan GH (2000) A decade of mediation-the promise fulfilled? Arbitrator 18(3):136–140

Hilmer SE (2009) Mediation in the People’s Republic of China and Hong Kong (SAR). Eleven International Publishing, China

Hilmer SE (2010) Mediation theory and practice in Hong Kong. LexisNexis, Hong Kong

Ingleby R (1993) Court sponsored mediation: the case against mandatory participation. Modern Law Rev 56(441):445

Olsson J (1996) Mediation and the courts—inspiration or desperation? JJA 5(236):237

Phillips JH (1997) The role and function of mediation and supreme court litigation. Victorian Bar News 25(27)

Spencer D (2000) Mandatory mediation and neutral evaluation: a reality in New South Wales. Aust Dispute Resolut J 11:237

Spigelman J (2001) Mediation and the court. Law Soci NSW J 39(2):64

Wong YL (2006) The benefits of mediation. Asian Dispute Rev 100