Managing for Political Corporate Social Responsibility: New Challenges and Directions for PCSR 2.0
Tóm tắt
This article takes stock of the discourse on ‘political CSR’ (PCSR), reconsiders some of its assumptions, and suggests new directions for what we call ‘PCSR 2.0’. We start with a definition of PCSR, focusing on firms’ contribution to public goods. We then discuss historical antecedents to the debate and outline the original economic and political context. The following section explores emerging changes in the institutional context relevant to PCSR and reconsiders some of the assumptions underlying Habermas’ thesis of the postnational constellation. This highlights some neglected issues in previous works on PCSR, including the influence of nationalism and fundamentalism, the role of various types of business organisations, the return of government regulation, the complexity of institutional contexts, the efficiency of private governance, the financialization and digitalization of the economy, and the relevance of managerial sensemaking. Finally, we discuss the contributions to this special issue and relate them to the newly emerging research agenda.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Barber B., 1992, Atlantic Monthly, 53
Beck U., 2000, What Is Globalization
Blair M. M., 2003, Corporate Governance and Capital Flows in a Global Economy, 53, 10.1093/oso/9780195167054.003.0003
Brynjolfsson E., 2014, The Second Machine Age. Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies
Cadbury A., 2003, Corporate Governance and Development: v‐vii
Castells M., 1996, The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. 3 Volumes (Vol. 1: The Rise of the Network Society; Vol. 2: The Power of Identity; Vol. 3: End of Millennium)
Crane A., 2008, The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, 3, 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.001.0001
Davis G. F., 2009, Managed by the Markets: How Finance Reshaped America
Doh J., 2009, NGOs and Corporations: Conflict and Collaboration
Easton D., 1981, The political system besieged by the state, Political Theory, 9, 303, 10.1177/009059178100900303
Etzioni A., 2003, Der Begriff des Politischen (Soziale Welt), 89
Friedman T. L., 2005, The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty‐first Century
Fukuyama F., 1992, The End of History and the Last Man
Giddens A., 1990, Consequences of Modernity
Goffman E., 1974, Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience
Greenwald G., 2014, No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State
Haack P., 2012, Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment? Exploring narrative dynamics in corporate responsibility standardization, Organization Studies, 5, 813
Habermas J., 2001, The Postnational Constellation
Habermas J., 2013, Habermas and Religion
Habermas J.(2015).The Paris Attack and its Aftermath. Available at:http://www.socialeurope.eu/2015/11/habermas-paris-attack/
Held D., 1999, Global Transformation
Ignatieff M. A. (, 1995, Blood and Belonging: Journeys into the New Nationalism
Kaplinsky R., 2010, Global Value Chains in a Postcrisis World: A Development Perspective, 125
Lanier J., 2013, Who Owns the Future
LeBaron G.andLister J.(2016).Ethical Audits and the Supply Chains of Global Corporations. SPERI Global Political Economy Brief No. 1 University of Sheffield. Available at:http://speri.dept.shef.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Global-Brief-1-Ethical-Audits-and-the-Supply-Chains-of-Global-Corporations.pdf(accessed 15 January 2016).
Magnuson W., 2013, International corporate bribery and unilateral enforcement, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 51, 360
Mäkinen J., 2016, In defense of a regulated market economy, Journal of Global Ethics
Michaels J. D., 2008, All the President's spies: Private-public intelligence partnerships in the War on Terror, California Law Review, 96, 901
OECD(2013).Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. OECD Publishing. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264192744-en
Paine L. S., 1994, Managing for organizational integrity, Harvard Business Review, 72, 106
Park S. K., 2014, Targeted social transparency as global corporate strategy, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 35, 87
Porter M. E., 2011, Creating shared value, Harvard Business Review, 89, 62
Richards N. M., 2013, The dangers of surveillance, Harvard Law Review, 126, 1934
Rifkin J., 2014, The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism
Rowley T. J., 2003, When will stakeholder groups act? An interest‐ and identity‐based model of stakeholder group mobilization, Academy of Management Journal, 28, 204
Scherer A. G.(2015).‘If You Don't Know Where You're Going You Might Not Get There’ – Theory Assessment and Agenda Setting in Political CSR. Working Paper. University of Zurich Switzerland.
Scherer A. G., 2000, The downward spiral and the U.S. Model Business Principles: Why MNEs should take responsibility for the improvement of world‐wide social and environmental conditions, Management International Review, 40, 351
Senge P. M., 2007, Collaborating for systemic change, MIT Sloan Management Review, 48, 44
Stone C. D., 1975, Where the Law Ends
The Fund for Peace, 2015, Fragile State Index 2015
Thompson G., 2008, Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship, 476
Weaver G. R., 2014, Encouraging ethics in organizations: A review of some key research findings, American Criminal Law Review, 51, 293
Wickert C. Scherer A. G.andSpence L.(2016).Walking and Talking Corporate Social Responsibility: Implications of Firm Size and Organizational Cost. Journal of Management Studies doi: 10.1111/joms.12209.