Managing early complications in total hip arthroplasty: the safety of immediate revision
Tóm tắt
Immediate revision refers to a reoperation that involves resetting, draping, and exchanging the implant, after wound closure in total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of immediate revision after total hip arthroplasty on subsequent infection and complication rates. A total of 14,076 primary total hip arthroplasties performed between 2010 and 2020 were identified in our institutional database, of which 42 underwent immediate revision. Infection rates were determined 2 years after the index arthroplasty. The cause and type of revision, duration of primary and revision surgeries, National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance score, implant type, changes in implants, complications, and preoperative and intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis were all determined. No infections were observed within 2 years after the index arthroplasty. Leg length discrepancy (88%, n = 37) and dislocation (7.1%, n = 3) were the main causes of immediate revision. In most cases of discrepancy, the limb was clinically and radiologically longer before the immediate revision. The mean operative time was 48 ± 14 min for the primary procedure and 23.6 ± 9 min for the revision. The time between the first incision and last skin closure ranged from 1 to 3 h. None of the patients were extubated between the two procedures. Two patients had a National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance score of 2, 13 had a score of 1, and 27 had a score of 0. Immediate revision is safe for correcting clinical and radiological abnormalities, and may not be associated with increased complication or infection rates. Retrospective cohort study; level of evidence, 3.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370:1508–1519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7
Fujita K, Kabata T, Kajino Y, Tsuchiya H (2020) Optimizing leg length correction in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 44:437–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04411-0
Marmor S, Farman T (2011) Causes de procédures médicolégales après prothèse totale de hanche. Rev Chir Orthopédique Traumatol 97:752–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcot.2011.09.001
Samuel LT, Sultan AA, Rabin JM et al. (2019) Medical malpractice litigation following primary total joint arthroplasty: a comprehensive, nationwide analysis of the past decade. J Arthroplasty 34:S102–S107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.066
Moslemi A, Kierszbaum E, Descamps J et al. (2021) Does using the direct anterior approach with a standard table for total hip arthroplasty reduce leg length discrepancies? Comparative study of traction table versus standard table. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 107:102752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102752
Sykes A, Hill J, Orr J et al. (2015) Patients’ perception of leg length discrepancy post total hip arthroplasty. HIP Int 25:452–456. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000276
Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Bissett GA et al. (2003) Surgical treatment of limb-length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg-Am 85:2310–2317. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200312000-00007
Goel A, Lau EC, Ong KL et al. (2015) Dislocation rates following primary total hip arthroplasty have plateaued in the medicare population. J Arthroplasty 30:743–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.11.012
Goldman AH, Osmon DR, Hanssen AD et al. (2020) The Lawrence D. Dorr surgical techniques and technologies award: aseptic reoperations within one year of primary total hip arthroplasty markedly increase the risk of later periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 35:S10–S14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.054
Heckmann ND, Yang J, Ong KL et al. (2021) Revision surgery for instability after total hip arthroplasty: does timing matter? J Arthroplasty 36:1779-1783.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.035
Quinlan ND, Werner BC, Brown TE, Browne JA (2020) Risk of prosthetic joint infection increases following early aseptic revision surgery of total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 35:3661–3667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.089
Khalifa AA, Bakr HM (2021) Updates in biomaterials of bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. Arthroplasty 3:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-021-00092-6
Konopitski A, Okafor C, Smith B et al. (2022) Evolution of total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years of age: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04357-w
Heaver C, St Mart J-P, Nightingale P et al. (2013) Measuring limb length discrepancy using pelvic radiographs: the most reproducible method. HIP Int 23:391–394. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000042
Emori TG, Culver DH, Horan TC et al. (1991) National nosocomial infections surveillance system (NNIS): description of surveillance methods. Am J Infect Control 19:19–35
Altemeier WA (1984) Manual on control of infection in surgical patients. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
The McMaster Arthroplasty Collaborative (MAC)1 a (2020) Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection following primary total hip arthroplasty: a 15-year, population-based cohort study. J Bone Jt Surg 102:503–509. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00537
Rullán PJ, Orr MN, Emara AK et al. (2022) Understanding the 30-day mortality burden after revision total hip arthroplasty. HIP Int. https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000221094543
Fang CJ, Shaker JM, Ward DM et al. (2021) Financial burden of revision hip and knee arthroplasty at an orthopedic specialty hospital: higher costs and unequal reimbursements. J Arthroplasty 36:2680–2684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.044
Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury TL (2020) Projections and epidemiology of revision hip and knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty 35:S79–S85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.030
Debbi EM, Rajaee SS, Mayeda BF, Penenberg BL (2020) Determining and achieving target limb length and offset in total hip arthroplasty using intraoperative digital radiography. J Arthroplasty 35:779–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.003
Hofmann AA, Bolognesi M, Lahav A, Kurtin S (2008) Minimizing leg-length inequality in total hip arthroplasty: use of preoperative templating and an intraoperative x-ray. Am J Orthop Belle Mead NJ 37:18–23
Siebenmorgen JP, Stronach BM, Mears SC, Stambough JB (2021) The use of intraoperative digital radiography alignment software to assess implant placement in total hip arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 14:369–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-021-09722-7
Herisson O, Felden A, Hamadouche M et al. (2016) Validity and reliability of intraoperative radiographs to assess leg length during total hip arthroplasty: correlation and reproducibility of anatomic distances. J Arthroplast 31:2784–2788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.004
Lenze F, Hinterwimmer F, Fleckenstein L et al. (2022) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of restoring hip biomechanics with and without a traction table. In Vivo. 36:424–429. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12720
Wernly D, Wegrzyn J, Lallemand G et al. (2021) Total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach with and without the use of a traction table: a matched-control, retrospective, single-surgeon study. J Orthop Surg 16:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-02184-6
Kayani B, Giebaly D, Haddad FS (2021) Leg length and total hip arthroplasty: old problem, new standards? Bone Jt J 103-B:1642–1645. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B11.BJJ-2021-1402
Meermans G, Doorn JV, Kats J-J (2016) Restoration of the centre of rotation in primary total hip arthroplasty: the influence of acetabular floor depth and reaming technique. Bone Jt J 98-B:1597–1603. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B12.BJJ-2016-0345.R1
Waibel FWA, Berndt K, Jentzsch T et al. (2021) Symptomatic leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty is associated with new onset of lower back pain. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 107:102761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102761
De Ladoucette A, Mertl P, Henry M-P et al. (2020) Fast track protocol for primary total hip arthroplasty in non-trauma cases reduces the length of hospital stay: prospective French multicenter study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106:1527–1531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2020.05.017
Guo H, Xu C, Chen J (2020) Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after primary artificial hip and knee joint replacements. J Infect Dev Ctries 14:565–571. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.11013