Managing Natural Capital Stocks for the Provision of Ecosystem Services

Conservation Letters - Tập 10 Số 2 - Trang 211-220 - 2017
Fleur J. F. Maseyk1,2, A. D. Mackay3, Hugh P. Possingham1,2,4, Estelle Dominati3, Yvonne M. Buckley1,2,5
1ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
2Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
3Land and Environment Group AgResearch Grasslands Palmerston North 4442 New Zealand
4Department of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
5School of Natural Sciences, Zoology, Trinity College Dublin The University of Dublin Dublin 2 Ireland

Tóm tắt

AbstractDecision makers and land managers are increasingly required to manage landscapes for multiple purposes and benefits. However, despite progress in the development of frameworks linking natural capital to the provision of ecosystem services and human benefits there remains little guidance for how management interventions can improve ecosystem service provision. As ecosystem services cannot be directly influenced, interventions need to be directed toward natural capital stocks. We provide a framework that explicitly links natural capital stocks to ecosystem service provision and identify manageable attributes of natural capital stocks as the critical intervention point. A structured decision making process based on our framing of the ecosystem services concept can facilitate its application on the ground.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1080/09644016.2013.765161

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00963.x

10.1038/515032a

10.1007/s10640-010-9418-x

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002

10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.011

Bristow K.L., 2010, 19th world congress of soil science: soil solutions for a changing world, 3538

10.1111/2041-210X.12143

10.1038/nature11148

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610037.x

10.1098/rstb.2009.0231

10.1890/080025

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588992.003.0001

10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.002

10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.006

10.1098/rspb.2015.1348

10.1111/jbi.12130

10.1016/j.cosust.2012.12.002

10.1002/9781444398557

10.1111/ele.12189

10.1111/1365-2664.12127

Haines‐Young R., 2011, Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES): 2011 update

10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.006

10.1038/nature13014

10.1038/nature05947

Kumar P., 2010, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations

MacArthur R.H., 1967, The theory of island biogeography

Mace G.M., 2011, The UK national ecosystem assessment technical report, 11

10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006

10.1111/1365-2664.12431

10.1111/1365-2664.12085

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005, Ecosystems and human well‐being: synthesis

Maestre F.T., 2012, Plant species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality in global drylands, Nature, 335, 214

10.1016/j.cosust.2013.05.010

10.1038/nature14324

Possingham H.P., 2001, Conservation biology: research priorities for the next decade, 225‐244

10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.09.008

10.1038/461472a

10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04272.x

10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.026

10.1126/science.1259855

10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.015

10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.008

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Conservation Letters

Tập 10 Số 2

211-220

Thông tin tác giả