Making organisations virtual: the hidden cost of distributed teams
Tóm tắt
This paper reports an exploratory case study that used boundary theory to investigate the impact of organisational virtualisation on work units. Specifically, the research analysed the transition in a public sector organisation from permanent, co-located teams to temporary virtual teams and its impact on team boundary properties and activities. The study contributes to existing knowledge of virtual teams and virtualisation processes in several ways. The findings suggest that, contrary to existing thinking, rather than removing organisational and institutional boundaries, virtualisation increases the number and complexity of such boundaries at the work unit level. The findings also indicate that the chronic lack of knowledge sharing on virtual teams is, in addition to difficulties of establishing interpersonal trust, due to a lack of trust in the technology as an appropriate medium for sensitive knowledge sharing. The implications of the study for practice are that efficiency gains from organisational virtualisation can easily be offset by the need to invest additional resources and team members' time into cultivating a greater number of transient relationships at a distance. Organisations also need to invest in opportunities for face-to-face interaction where sensitive knowledge sharing is a critical resource for a virtual team.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alderfer, C.P. (1980). Consulting to Underbounded Systems, in C.L. Cooper, and C.P. Alderfer (eds.) Advances in Experiential Social Processes, New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 267–295.
Ancona, D.G. (1990). Outward Bound: Strategies for team survival in the organization, Academy of Management Journal 33(2): 334–365.
Ancona, D.G. and Caldwell, D.F. (1992). Bridging the Boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams, Administrative Science Quarterly 37(4): 634–665.
Apgar, M. (1998). The Alternative Workplace: Changing where and how people work, Harvard Business Review 76(3): 121–136.
Bentley, R. (2003). Remote technology initiative helps council save £23m with flexible and home workers, Computer Weekly, 4 November, p. 64.
Biggs, M. (2000). Assessing risks today will leave corporate leaders well-prepared for the future of work, InfoWorld, September, http://archive.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/00/09/25/000925opbiggs.xml.
Boland, R.J. and Tenkasi, R.V. (1995). Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Communities of Knowing, Organization Science 6(4): 350–372.
Boudreau, M.-C., Loch, K.D., Robey, D. and Straud, D. (1998). Going Global: Using information technology to advance the competitiveness of the virtual transnational organization, Academy of Management Executive 12(4): 120–128.
Brown, J.S. (1998). Internet Technology in Support of the Concept of “Communities-of-practice”: The case of Xerox, Accounting, Management & Information Technology 8(4): 227–236.
Brown, L.D. (1983). Managing Conflict at Organizational Interfaces, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Caldwell, D.F. and Koch, J.L. (2000). The Impact of Mobile Computing on Work Groups, Research on Managing Groups and Teams: Technology 3: 133–156.
Chesbrough, H.W. and Teece, D.J. (1996). When is Virtual Virtuous? Organizing for Innovation, Harvard Business Review 74(1): 65–73.
Cramton, C.D. (2001). The Mutual Knowledge Problem and its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration, Organization Science 12(3): 346–371.
Cranfield School of Management (2001). The Future of Work: Our survey results, in B2E: Empowering employees in the digital age. The Sunday Times Special Supplement, 29 April, p 3.
Department of Trade and Industry (2003). Flexible Working: The right to request and the duty to consider — a guide for employers and employees. http://www.dti.gov.uk/er/individual/flexwork-pl520.pdf.
DeSanctis, G. and Monge, P. (1999). Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication processes for virtual organizations, Organization Science 10(6): 693–703.
Dutton, W.H. (1999). Society on the Line: Information politics in the digital age, New York: Oxford University Press.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building Theories from Case Research, Academy of Management Review 14(4): 532–550.
Fulk, J. and DeSanctis, G. (1995). Electronic Communication and Changing Organizational Forms, Organization Science 6(4): 337–349.
Gammack, J. and Poon, S. (2001). Knowledge and Teamwork in the Virtual Organization, in S. Barnes and B. Hunt (eds.) e-Commerce and V-Business: Business models for global success, Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, pp. 213–231.
Gassmann, O. and Zedtwitz, M.von (2003). Trends and Determinants of Managing Virtual R&D Teams, R&D Management 33(3): 243–262.
Grabowski, M. and Roberts, K.H. (1999). Risk Mitigation in Virtual Organization, Organization Science 10(6): 704–721.
Griffith, T.L., Sawyer, J.E. and Neale, M.A. (2003). Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology, MIS Quarterly 27(2): 265–287.
Handy, C. (1995). Trust and the Virtual Organization, Harvard Business Review 73(3): 40–50.
Hinds, P. and Kiesler, S. (1995). Communication across Boundaries: Work, structure and use of communication technologies in a large organization, Organization Science 6(4): 373–393.
Ives, B. and Jarvenpaa, S.L. (1991). Applications of Global Information Technology: Key issues for management, MIS Quarterly 15(1): 33–49.
Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Leidner, D.E. (1999). Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams, Organization Science 10(6): 791–815.
Krackhardt, D. and Hanson, J.R. (1993). Informal Networks: The company behind the chart, Harvard Business Review 71(4): 104–111.
Lamont, M. and Molnar, V. (2002). The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences, Annual Review of Sociology 28(1): 167–195.
Lipnack, J. and Stamps, J. (1999). Virtual Teams: The new way to work, Strategy and Leadership 27(1): 14–19.
Louis, M.R. (1996). Creating Safe Havens at Work, in D.T. Hall (ed.) The Career is Dead: Long Live the Career, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 223–245.
Lucas, H.C. and Baroudi, J. (1994). The Role of Information Technology in Organization Design, Journal of Management Information Systems 10(4): 9–23.
Lurey, J.S. and Raisinghani, M.S. (2001). An Empirical Study of Best Practices in Virtual Teams, Information and Management 38(8): 523–544.
Majchrzak, A., Rice, R.E., Malhotra, A. and King, N. (2000). Technology Adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team, MIS Quarterly 24(4): 569–600.
Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., Carman, R. and Lott, V. (2001). Radical Innovation without Collocation: A case study of Boeing-Rocketdyne, MIS Quarterly 25(2): 229–249.
Mankin, D., Cohen, S.G. and Bikson, T.K. (1996). Teams and Technology: Fulfilling the promise of the new organization, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Maznevski, M.L. and Chudoba, K.M. (2000). Bridging Space over Time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness, Organization Science 11(5): 473–492.
Miles, R.E. and Snow, C.C. (1992). Causes of Failure in Network Organizations, California Management Review 34(4): 53–72.
O'Hara-Devereux, M. and Johansen, R. (1994). Global Work: Bridging distance, culture, and time, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Orton, J.D. and Weick, K.E. (1990). Loosely Coupled Systems: A reconceptualization, Academy of Management Review 15(2): 203–223.
Pauleen, D.J. and Yoong, P. (2001). Relationship Building and the Use of ICT in Boundary-crossing Virtual Teams: A facilitators' perspective, Journal of Information Technology 16(4): 205–220.
Robey, D., Boudreau, M.-C. and Rose, G.M. (2000). Information Technology and Organizational Learning: A review and assessment of research, Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 10(2): 125–155.
Schneider, S.C. (1991). Managing Boundaries in Organizations, in K. de Vries (ed.) Organizations on the Couch, San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, pp. 169–189.
Schultze, U. and Boland, R.J. (2000). Knowledge Management Technology and the Reproduction of Knowledge Work Practices, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9(2/3): 193–212.
Schultze, U. and Orlikowski, W.J. (2001). Metaphors of Virtuality: Shaping an emergent reality, Information and Organization 11(1): 45–77.
Scott, W.R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Smith, C. and Comer, D. (1994). Self-organization in Small Groups: A study of group effectiveness with non-equilibrium conditions, Human Relations 47(5): 553–581.
Townsend, A., DeMarie, S. and Hendrickson, A. (1998). Virtual Teams: Technology and the workplace of the future, Academy of Management Executive 12(3): 17–29.
Williams, R.L. and Cothrel, J. (2000). Four Smart Ways to Run Online Communities, Sloan Management Review 41(4): 81–91.
Yan, A. and Louis, M. (1999). The Migration of Organizational Functions to the Work Unit Level: Buffering, spanning, and bringing up boundaries, Human Relations 52(1): 25–47.
Yap, A.Y. and Bjorn-Andersen, N. (2002). Capturing Tacit Mental Models with 3D Technologies: Enhancing knowledge-sharing in virtual organizations, Electronic Journal of Organizational Virtualness 4(2): 18–63.