Making anticipatory systems more robust

Emerald - Tập 12 Số 3 - Trang 72-85 - 2010
PierreRossel1
1Senior Scientific Fellow at the College of Management, Ecole polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Tóm tắt

PurposeWhen coping with complex, but also possibly disruptive and open‐ended social dynamics, the anticipatory system idea, which was developed by Rosen in the realm of physical and biological system observation, remains a reference framework, but one that may need to be reinforced by other theoretical considerations. This paper aims at using a debate that took place in a specific foresight discussion arena on early detection and weak signal analysis, as a constructive epistemic detour to eventually contribute to such a reinforcement of Rosen's anticipatory system proposal.Design/methodology/approachThe author aims at revisiting Rosen's framework with stimulating inputs drawing upon the early detection debates, by first assessing the original concepts brought up by Ansoff in the 1970s and 1980s and its further enhancements by contemporary scholars. A rather constructivist approach is then developed to weak signal analysis, aiming at emphasising the need, in analytical situations involving social system features, for reflexive stages and capacities. Bearing this requirement in mind, the productive value of the “framing” and “meta‐framing” notions is explored, in order to apply them to Rosen's anticipatory systems and possibly contribute to enriching his original concept.FindingsHow effective the framing and meta‐framing couple can be for a series of anticipatory issues is described in a detailed manner and, then more specifically, Rosen's anticipatory system concept is revisited in the light of those inputs, aiming at putting into perspective new options for research and anticipation activities in general.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper is essentially conceptual and based on a rich but disputable detour by early detection and weak analysis issues so as to emphasise key reflexive references and method. However, most of this material is taken from domains rather untypical of Rosennean debates and in addition would need to be completed by a series of supportive cases, but that is beyond the scope and scale of this paper.Practical implicationsThe paper sets clear distinctions and boundaries for when and when not to apply reflexive steps in a foresight exercise, including in the context of rolling out a Rosen type of approach. Research decision making both in the corporate and policy‐making contexts can benefit from such clues and supportive framework conditions.Social implicationsSocial systems are typically complex and involve multiple perspectives and viewpoints; they concern a series of major challenges to be coped with locally or more globally, at environmental, political, cultural or technological level, and in that category of anticipatory endeavor, the framing/meta‐framing epistemic couple may be of great usefulness.Originality/valueAlthough rather conceptual, the detour proposed by the paper aims at creating a reflexive distance and enriched capability to evaluate one's potential biases and blind spots in anticipatory modelling activities.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adam, B. (2006), “Has the future already happened?”, paper presented at the International Conference “Future matters: futures known, created and minded”, Cardiff University, Cardiff, 4‐6 September.

Ansoff, I. (1975), “Managing strategic surprise by response to weak signals”, California Management Review, Vol. XVIII No. 2, pp. 21‐33.

Ansoff, I. (1982), “Strategic response in turbulent environments”, Working Paper No. 82‐35, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, Brussels, August.

Ansoff, I. (1984), Implanting Strategic Management, Prentice‐Hall International, New York, NY.

Bateson, G. (1972), Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Ballantine Books, New York, NY.

Bower, J.L. and Christensen, C.M. (1995), “Disruptive technologies: catching the wave”, Harvard Business Review, January/February.

Day, G.S. and Schoemaker, P.J.H. (2006), Peripheral Vision: Detecting the Weak Signals that Will Make or Break Your Company, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.

Cahen, P. (2009), “La lettre des signaux faibles, un exercice mensuel de prospective”, available at: www.signaux‐faibles.fr/ and www.blog‐coana.fr/files/textes/Philippe%20Cahen%20‐%20les%20signaux%20faibles.pdf.

Cappallo, S. and Wiegand, S. (2004), “Strategic early warning systems and ontologies”, paper presented at the Research Forum to Understand Business in Knowledge Society, EBRF, Tampere, 20‐22 September.

Christensen, C.M. (1997), The Innovator's Dilemma, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.

Christensen, C.M. and Raynor, M.E. (2003), The Innovator's Solution, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.

Fisher, K. (1997), “Locating frames in the discursive universe”, Sociological Research Online, Vol. 2 No. 3.

Freeman, O. and Pattinson, H. (2007), “Scenarios for the client in scenario planning: six walks in the scenario woods”, The 3rd International Conference on Organizational Foresight: “Learning the Future Faster”, Proceedings of the Strathclyde Business School, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, 16‐18 August.

Fuller, T. and de Smedt, P. (2008), “From oracles to dialogue”, paper presented at the Third International Seminar on Future‐Oriented Technology Analysis: Impacts and Implications for Policy and Decision‐making, IPTS, Sevilla, 16‐17 October.

Gilad, B. (2003), Early Warning: Using Competitive Intelligence to Anticipate Market Shifts, Control Risk, and Create Powerful Strategies, AMACOM, New York, NY.

Gofmann, E. (1974), Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience, Harper & Row, London.

Gustafsson, R. and Ahola, E. (2003), “Exploring a new generation of national technology programmes – weak and strong signals on roles and goals”, Conference on Innovation in Europe: Dynamics, Institutions and Values, Roskilde, 8‐9 May.

Habegger, B. (2006), “Strategic early warning of emerging political risks”, paper presented at the International Disaster Reduction Conference, IDRC, Davos, 28 August (extended abstract published in Proceedings of the IDRC, Vol. 2, pp. 216‐8, 2006).

Hiltunen, E. (2006), “Was it a wild card or just our blindness to gradual change”, Journal of Futures Studies, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 61‐74.

Hiltunen, E. (2007), “The futures window – a medium for presenting visual weak signals to trigger wmployees' futures thinking in organizations”, Working Paper w‐423, HSE Publications, London.

Hiltunen, E. (2008), “The future sign and its three dimensions”, Futures, Vol. 40, pp. 247‐60.

Kaivo‐oja, J. and Mendonça, S. (2007), “Introducing seeds of change: exploring new ways to explore the future”, Proceedings of the COST A22 Final Conference “From Oracle to Dialogue, Exploring New Ways to Explore the Future”, Athens, 9‐11 July.

Könnölä, T., Brummer, V. and Salo, A. (2007), “Diversity in foresight: insights from the fostering of innovation ideas”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 74, pp. 608‐26.

Kuosa, T. (2005), “Heikko signaali vai merkityksetön kohina: Pattern management – ontologisesti uusi lähestymistapa heikkojen signaalien tarkasteluun ja tulkintaan” (“A weak signal or meaningless noise: pattern management – an ontologically new approach to examining and interpreting weak signals”), Futura, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 115‐20.

Luhmann, N. (1996), Social Systems, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA.

Mannermaa, M. (2004), Heikoista signaaleista vahva tulevaisuus (A Strong Future from Weak Signals), WSOY, Porvoo.

Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1980), “Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living”, in Cohen, R.S. and Wartofsky, M.W. (Eds), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 42, Reidel, Dordecht, (first published 1973).

Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1987), The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, Shambhala Publications, Boston, MA.

Morel, C. (2002), Les décisions absurdes, Gallimard, Paris.

Morrison, J.L. and Wilson, I. (1996), “The strategic management response to the challenge of global change”, in Didsbury, H. (Ed.), Future Vision, Ideas, Insights, and Strategies, The World Future Society, Bethesda, MD.

Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge‐creating Company, Oxford University Press, London.

Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001), Re‐thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Polity Press, London.

Poli, R. (2009), “An introduction to the ontology of anticipation”, Futures, available at: http://robertopoli.it/Papers/Poli%202009%20Introduction%20to%20Anticipation.pdf.

Reinhardt, W.A. (1984), “An early warning system for strategic planning”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 25‐34.

Renn, O. (2000), “Risikowissenschaft und Risikomanagement”, ETH Bulletin, Vol. 279, November, pp. 10‐14.

Rosen, R. (1985), Anticipatory Systems: Philosophical, Mathematical and Methodological Foundations, Pergamon Press, London.

Rosen, R. (1991), Life Itself, Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

Rosen, R. (1998), Essays on Life Itself, Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

Rosen, J. and Kineman, J.‐J. (2005), “Anticipatory systems and time: a new look at Rosennean complexity”, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 22, pp. 399‐412.

Rossel, P. (2007), “Meta‐framing: the art of putting weak signals in perspective”, Proceedings of the COST A22 Final Conference “From Oracle to Dialogue, Exploring New Ways to Explore the Future, Athens, 9‐11 July.

Rossel, P. (2009), “Weak signals as a flexible framing space for enhanced management and decision‐making”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 21 No. 3, p. 307.

Scheufele, D.A. (1999), “Framing as a theory of media effects”, Journal of Communication, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 103‐22.

Snow, D.A., Rochford, E.B., Worden, S.K. and Benford, R.D. (1986), “Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 51, pp. 464‐81.

Steinmueller, K.H. (2006), “Thinking out of the box, weak signals and wild cards for European regions”, Zpunkt, the Foresight Company, available at: www.futuresconference.fi/2006/presentations/ws06‐steinmuller.pdf.

von Foerster, H. (2003), Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition, Springer‐Verlag, New York, NY.

Bergheim, S. (2006), “Global growth centres: challenges and choices for European policymakers”, paper presented at the 2nd European Futurists Conference, Luzern, November, available at: www.dbresearch.com/PROD/DBR_INTERNET_EN‐PROD/PROD0000000000204270.pdf.

Coffman, B. (1997), “Weak signal research”, available at: www.mgtaylor.com/mgtaylor/jotm/winter97/jotmwi97.htm.

Nikander, O. and Eloranta, E. (2001), “Project management by early warnings”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 19, pp. 385‐99.

Peirce, C.S. (1960), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volumes I and II, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Snowden, D. (2002), “Complex acts of knowing: paradox and descriptive self‐awareness”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 100‐11.

Snowden, D. (2005), “Strategy in the context of uncertainty”, Handbook of Business Strategy Journal, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 47‐54.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 12 Số 3

72-85

Thông tin tác giả