MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING TECHNIQUES IN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE STATE OF THE ART LITERATURE

Transport - Tập 31 Số 3 - Trang 359-385 - 2015
Abbas Mardani1, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas2, Zainab Khalifah1, Ahmad Jusoh1, Khalil Md Nor1
1Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Skudai, Johor, 81310, Malaysia
2Dept of Construction Technology and Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania

Tóm tắt

The main goal of this review paper is to provide a systematic review of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques in regard to transportation systems problems. This study reviewed a total of 89 papers, published from 1993 to 2015, from 39 high-ranking journals; most of which were related to transportation science and were extracted from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. Papers were classified into 10 main application areas and nine transport infrastructure. Furthermore, papers were categorized based on the author(s) and year, name of the journal in which they were published, technique and approach, author(s) nationality, application area and scope, study purpose, gap and research problem and results and outcome. The results of this study indicated that more papers on MCDM in 2013 than in any other year. AHP and Fuzzy-AHP methods in the individual methods and hybrid MCDM and fuzzy MCDM in the integrated methods were ranked as the first and second methods in use, respectively. The Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice was the most significant journal in this study, with 13 publications on the topic. Finally, service quality was ranked as the first application area and airline industry was ranked as the first transport infrastructure that applied MCDM techniques.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1080/01441647.2014.997323

10.1002/atr.5670430402

10.1007/s11116-008-9181-9

Asakura Y., 1991, Transportation Planning Methods: Proceedings of Seminar G Held at the PTRC Transport Highways and Planning Summer Annual Meeting, 73

10.1016/j.cie.2011.04.019

10.1016/j.tra.2015.03.029

10.3846/16484142.2014.897996

10.1016/j.tra.2014.12.001

10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.03.002

10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141

10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4

10.1080/14783363.2013.809942

10.1016/j.trc.2013.02.014

10.1016/S1369-8478(00)00005-X

10.1287/opre.44.3.501

10.1080/03155986.1992.11732186

10.3846/tede.2010.01

Brauers W. K. M., 2006, Control and Cybernetics, 35, 445

10.3846/1648-4142.2008.23.183-193

10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.054

10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.010

10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.02.008

10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.005

10.1016/j.tre.2013.06.006

10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00003-3

10.1016/j.ssci.2014.12.006

10.1016/S0305-0483(01)00032-9

10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.01.004

Chen K.-H., 2014, Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2014, 1

10.1016/j.tra.2014.04.015

10.1007/11526018_9

10.1111/j.1468-0394.2010.00574.x

10.1155/2013/656757

10.1016/j.asoc.2010.07.010

10.1007/978-3-540-71549-8_29

Denyer D., 2009, The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, 671

10.1016/j.ins.2004.07.013

10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.07.007

10.1016/j.acme.2012.03.008

10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.042

10.1016/S0969-6989(00)00003-5

10.1023/B:PORT.0000016572.41816.d2

10.1080/01441647.2013.853707

10.1002/atr.5670430204

10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.041

10.1108/09574091211226975

10.1016/j.tra.2011.11.006

10.1080/01441647.2014.993745

10.1016/j.jairtraman.2012.12.009

10.1016/j.tre.2009.08.005

10.1007/978-3-642-45511-7

10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

10.1016/j.trb.2015.03.002

10.1016/S2095-7564(15)30101-X

10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.003

10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.04.002

10.1504/IJDATS.2015.067700

10.1007/978-0-387-76813-7

10.1016/0965-8564(95)00014-3

10.1109/21.214763

10.3846/2029-0187.2008.14.51-63

Kazançoğlu Y., 2013, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 8, 59

Keeney R. L., 1976, Decision Analysis with Multiple Conflicting Objectives

10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310245

10.3846/jbem.2010.12

Kickert W. J. M., 1979, Fuzzy Theories on Decision Making: A Critical Review

10.1142/9789814335591

10.1142/S0219622014500825

10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.007

10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.003

10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.052

10.3390/su6074685

10.1016/j.knosys.2011.11.019

10.1016/j.asoc.2011.03.002

10.1007/s11135-009-9259-2

10.1016/j.tra.2014.07.007

10.1016/j.jairtraman.2010.03.004

10.1016/j.asoc.2011.01.024

10.3846/20294913.2012.753489

10.1016/j.jairtraman.2006.12.002

10.1016/j.jairtraman.2007.04.008

10.1080/13675560310001626990

10.1016/j.tmp.2012.09.004

10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.11.006

10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.04.002

Lupo T., 2013, European Transport – Trasporti Europei, 1

MacCrimmon K. R., 1968, Decisionmaking among Multiple-Attribute Alternatives: a Survey and Consolidated Approach. Memorandum RM-4823-ARPA. Prepared for Advanced Research Projects Agency

10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.08.002

10.1080/1331677X.2015.1075139

10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003

10.3390/su71013947

10.3846/16111699.2015.1095233

10.1016/j.tra.2013.10.006

10.1007/978-3-642-49997-5

10.1108/02656710910936726

10.1016/j.renene.2004.02.012

10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.001

10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1

10.1108/01443570210427695

10.1016/j.trc.2010.12.003

10.1007/s10479-014-1681-8

10.1002/smj.454

10.3846/16484142.2013.866980

10.1016/j.rtbm.2012.06.015

10.1109/TEM.2009.2037743

10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.005

10.1007/978-1-4757-2500-1

Saaty R. W., 2003, Decision Making in Complex Environments: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Decision Making and the Analytic Network Process (ANP) for Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback

Saaty T. L., 2005, Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks, 3

10.1007/978-3-642-83555-1_5

10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7

10.1504/IJBPSCM.2011.039973

10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.047

10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.09.001

10.1016/j.tra.2008.03.003

10.1007/s11116-005-0645-x

10.1007/s11116-009-9239-3

Toosi N. M., 2011, The Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science, 2, 171, 10.22436/jmcs.002.01.18

10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.125

10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Tsai W.-H., 2011, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 15499

10.1080/14783363.2011.611326

10.1016/j.jairtraman.2008.04.003

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1999)125:5(407)

10.1016/j.tra.2005.08.002

Turskis Z., 2010, Informatica, 21, 597, 10.15388/Informatica.2010.307

10.3846/transport.2010.52

Tzeng G.-H., 2011, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, 10.1201/b11032

10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.08.003

10.1016/j.eswa.2006.07.003

10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.021

10.1016/j.eswa.2007.12.027

10.1016/j.eswa.2007.02.029

Wang Y.-J., 2003, International Mathematical Journal, 3, 367

10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.04.009

10.1016/0965-8564(93)90059-T

10.1016/j.omega.2006.10.001

10.1002/int.10045

10.1016/0165-0114(78)90010-6

10.1080/00207543.2015.1022266

10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.021

10.1016/S0965-8564(03)00027-2

10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00315-X

10.1007/s11116-005-6000-4

10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.06.004

10.1002/atr.5670430207

10.3846/20294913.2011.593291

10.3846/tede.2010.10

Zavadskas E. K., 2008, Informatica, 19, 303, 10.15388/Informatica.2008.215

Zavadskas E. K., 1994, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 1, 131

Zavadskas E. K., 2012, Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika – Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 3

10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.12.004

10.1016/0165-0114(78)90031-3

10.1016/j.tra.2012.05.018