Low carbon futures: assessing the status of decarbonisation efforts at universities within a 2050 perspective
Tóm tắt
The implementation of sustainability at universities means that they can also play a key role in the transition to a low carbon economy, and in assisting global efforts towards decarbonisation. Yet, not all of them have so far fully engaged in this area. This paper reviews the state of the art on trends in decarbonisation, and outlines the need for decarbonisation efforts at universities. It also reports on a survey aimed at ascertaining the extent to which universities in a sample of 40 countries across the various geographical regions are engaged in carbon reduction efforts, identifying the challenges faced. The study has shown that the literature on the topic has been evolving over time and that increasing a given university’s energy supply from renewable energy sources has been the cornerstone of university-based climate action plans. The study also indicates that even though several universities are concerned with their carbon footprint and actively seeking ways to reduce it, there are some institutional obstacles that need to be overcome. A first conclusion which can be drawn is that efforts on decarbonisation are becoming more popular, with a special focus being placed on the use of renewable energy. Also, the study has shown that, from the range of efforts being made towards decarbonisation, many universities are setting up a team with carbon management responsibilities, have Carbon Management Policy Statements, and review them. The paper points towards some measures which may be deployed, so as to allow universities to take better advantage of the many opportunities an engagement in decarbonisation initiatives offers to them.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Capros P, Paroussos L, Fragkos P et al (2014) Description of models and scenarios used to assess European decarbonisation pathways. Energy Strateg Rev 2:220–230
Cavicchioli R, Ripple WJ, Timmis KN et al (2019) Scientists’ warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:569–586
Arguez A, Hurley S, Inamdar A et al (2020) Should we expect each year in the next decade (2019–28) to be ranked among the top 10 warmest years globally? Bull Am Meteorol Soc 101:E655–E663
Gössling S, Scott D (2018) The decarbonisation impasse: global tourism leaders’ views on climate change mitigation. J Sustain Tour 26:2071–2086. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1529770
Mann ME, Rahmstorf S, Kornhuber K et al (2017) Influence of anthropogenic climate change on planetary wave resonance and extreme weather events. Sci Rep 7:45242
Mukherjee S, Mishra A, Trenberth KE (2018) Climate change and drought: a perspective on drought indices. Curr Clim Chang Reports. 4:145–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0098-x
Bevacqua E, Maraun D, Vousdoukas MI et al (2019) Higher probability of compound flooding from precipitation and storm surge in Europe under anthropogenic climate change. Sci Adv 5:eaaw5531. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw5531
Williams AP, Abatzoglou JT, Gershunov A et al (2019) Observed impacts of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire in California. Earth’s Futur 7:892–910. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001210
Ogden N, Gachon P (2019) Climate change and infectious diseases: what can we expect? Canada Commun Dis Rep. 45:76–80
Papadis E, Tsatsaronis G (2020) Challenges in the decarbonization of the energy sector. Energy 205:118025
Sovacool BK (2007) Solving the oil independence problem: is it possible? Energy Policy 35:5505–5514
Sovacool BK, Noel L, Kester J et al (2018) Reviewing Nordic transport challenges and climate policy priorities: expert perceptions of decarbonisation in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden. Energy 165:532–542
Sovacool BK (2017) Contestation, contingency, and justice in the Nordic low-carbon energy transition. Energy Policy 102:569–582
Li Z, Chen Z, Yang N et al (2021) Trends in research on the carbon footprint of higher education: a bibliometric analysis (2010–2019). J Clean Prod 289:125642
Robinson O, Kemp S, Williams I (2015) Carbon management at universities: a reality check. J Clean Prod 106:109–118
Liu H, Wang X, Yang J et al (2017) The ecological footprint evaluation of low carbon campuses based on life cycle assessment: a case study of Tianjin, China. J Clean Prod 144:266–278
Genta C, Favaro S, Sonetti G et al (2019) Envisioning green solutions for reducing the ecological footprint of a university campus. Int J Sustain High Educ 20:423–440. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2019-0039/full/html
Ortegon K, Acosta P (2019) Ecological footprint: a tool for environmental management in educational institutions. Int J Sustain High Educ 20:675–690. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2018-0156/full/html
Filimonau V, Archer D, Bellamy L et al (2021) The carbon footprint of a UK University during the COVID-19 lockdown. Sci Total Environ 756:143964
Larsen HN, Pettersen J, Solli C et al (2013) Investigating the carbon footprint of a university—the case of NTNU. J Clean Prod 48:39–47
Ozawa-Meida L, Brockway P, Letten K et al (2013) Measuring carbon performance in a UK University through a consumption-based carbon footprint: De Montfort University case study. J Clean Prod 56:185–198
Lambrechts W, Van Liedekerke L (2014) Using ecological footprint analysis in higher education: campus operations, policy development and educational purposes. Ecol Indic 45:402–406
Robinson OJ, Tewkesbury A, Kemp S et al (2018) Towards a universal carbon footprint standard: a case study of carbon management at universities. J Clean Prod 172:4435–4455
Evans J, Karvonen A (2014) ‘Give me a laboratory and I will lower your carbon footprint!’—urban laboratories and the governance of low-carbon futures. Int J Urban Reg Res 38:413–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12077
Genus A, Theobald K (2015) Roles for university researchers in urban sustainability initiatives: the {UK} Newcastle Low Carbon Neighbourhoods project. J Clean Prod 106:119–126
Leal Filho W, Salvia AL, Pretorius RW, et al. Universities as living labs for sustainable development: supporting the implementation of the sustainable development goals. World Sustain Ser. 2020.
Save P, TerimCavka B, Froese T (2021) Evaluation and lessons learned from a campus as a living lab program to promote sustainable practices. Sustainability 13:1739
Alghamdi A, Haider H, Hewage K et al (2019) Inter-university sustainability benchmarking for Canadian higher education institutions: water, energy, and carbon flows for technical-level decision-making. Sustain 11:2599
Lozano R, Ceulemans K, Alonso-Almeida M et al (2015) A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable development in higher education: results from a worldwide survey. J Clean Prod 108:1–18
Mazhar MU, Bull R, Lemon M (2017) Critical success factors for embedding carbon management in organizations: lessons from the UK higher education sector. Carbon Manag. 8:379–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2017.1386533
Mazhar MU, Bull R, Lemon M, et al. Carbon management planning in UK Universities: a journey to low carbon built environment. Univ Initiat Clim Chang Mitig Adapt. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89590-1_3.
Barron AR, Parker BJ, Sayre SS, et al. Carbon pricing approaches for climate decisions in U.S. higher education: proxy carbon prices for deep decarbonization. In: Kapuscinski AR, Frumhoff PC, editors. Elem Sci Anthr . 2020;8. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.443/114479/Carbon-pricing-approaches-for-climate-decisions-in.
Horan W, Shawe R, Moles R et al (2019) Development and evaluation of a method to estimate the potential of decarbonisation technologies deployment at higher education campuses. Sustain Cities Soc 47:101464
Victor DG, Abdulla A, Auston D et al (2018) Turning Paris into reality at the University of California. Nat Clim Chang 8:183–185
Worsham M, Brecha RJ (2017) Carbon lock-in: an obstacle in higher education’s decarbonization pathways. J Environ Stud Sci 7:435–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-017-0431-z
Button CE (2009) Towards carbon neutrality and environmental sustainability at CCSU. Int J Sustain High Educ 10:279–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370910972585/full/html
Waisman H, Bataille C, Winkler H et al (2019) A pathway design framework for national low greenhouse gas emission development strategies. Nat Clim Chang 9:261–268
Caird S, Lane A, Swithenby E et al (2015) Design of higher education teaching models and carbon impacts. Int J Sustain High Educ 16:96–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2013-0065/full/html
Roy R, Potter S, Yarrow K (2008) Designing low carbon higher education systems. Int J Sustain High Educ 9:116–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370810856279/full/html
Versteijlen M, Perez Salgado F, Janssen Groesbeek M et al (2017) Pros and cons of online education as a measure to reduce carbon emissions in higher education in the Netherlands. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 28:80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.09.004
Grimes DA, Schulz KF (2002) Descriptive studies: what they can and cannot do. Lancet 359:145–149
Tarzian AJ, Cohen MZ (2011) Descriptive research. In: Fitzpatrick JJ, Kazer M (eds) Encycl Nurs Res, 3rd edn. Springer Publishing Company, Berlin, p 732
van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84:523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Eck NJ van, Waltman L. VOSviewer Manual: Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.16. 2020.
Biresselioglu ME, Demir MH, Demirbag Kaplan M et al (2020) Individuals, collectives, and energy transition: analysing the motivators and barriers of European decarbonisation. Energy Res Soc Sci 66:101493
Dubois G, Sovacool B, Aall C et al (2019) It starts at home? Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioral decisions are key to low-carbon futures. Energy Res Soc Sci 52:144–158
OECD/IEA/NEA/ITF. Aligning Policies for a Low-carbon Economy. Paris, France: OECD Publishing; 2015.
Sovacool BK, Cabeza LF, Pisello AL et al (2021) Decarbonizing household heating: reviewing demographics, geography and low-carbon practices and preferences in five European countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 139:110703
Hilton CE (2017) The importance of pretesting questionnaires: a field research example of cognitive pretesting the Exercise referral Quality of Life Scale (ER-QLS). Int J Soc Res Methodol 20:21–34
Bornstein MH, Jager J, Putnick DL (2013) Sampling in developmental science: situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards. Dev Rev 33:357–370
Yoshida Y, Shimoda Y, Ohashi T (2017) Strategies for a sustainable campus in Osaka University. Energy Build 147:1–8
Opel O, Strodel N, Werner KF et al (2017) Climate-neutral and sustainable campus Leuphana University of Lueneburg. Energy 141:2628–2639
Na W, Zhao ZC. The comprehensive evaluation method of low-carbon campus based on analytic hierarchy process and weights of entropy. Environ Dev Sustain. 2020.
Ridhosari B, Rahman A (2020) Carbon footprint assessment at Universitas Pertamina from the scope of electricity, transportation, and waste generation: toward a green campus and promotion of environmental sustainability. J Clean Prod 246:119172
Udas E, Wölk M, Wilmking M (2018) The, “carbon-neutral university”—a study from Germany. Int J Sustain High Educ 19:130–145
Bouscayrol A, Castex E, Delarue P, et al. Campus of university with mobility based on innovation and carbon neutral. In: 2017 IEEE Veh Power Propuls Conf VPPC 2017 Proc. 2018. p. 1–5.
Li X, Tan H, Rackes A (2015) Carbon footprint analysis of student behavior for a sustainable university campus in China. J Clean Prod 106:97–108
Guerrieri M, La Gennusa M, Peri G et al (2019) University campuses as small-scale models of cities: quantitative assessment of a low carbon transition path. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 113:109263
Davies JC, Dunk RM (2016) Flying along the supply chain: accounting for emissions from student air travel in the higher education sector. Carbon Manag. 6:233–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2016.1151503
Sultana S, Kim H, Pourebrahim N et al (2018) Geographical assessment of low-carbon transportation modes: a case study from a commuter university. Sustain 10:2696
D’Adamo I, de Monte F, Ferella F et al (2021) The case study of a photovoltaic plant located at the university of L’Aquila: an economic analysis. J Clean Prod 278:123561
Hernandez-Escobedo Q, Ramirez-Jimenez A, Dorador-Gonzalez JM, et al. Sustainable solar energy in Mexican Universities. Case Study: The National School of Higher Studies Juriquilla (UNAM). Sustain. 2020.
Shirzadi N, Nasiri F, Eicker U. Optimal configuration and sizing of an integrated renewable energy system for isolated and grid-connected microgrids: the case of an Urban University Campus. Energies. 2020.
Vu BH, Husein M, Kang H-K et al (2019) Optimal design for a campus microgrid considering ESS discharging incentive and financial feasibility. J Electr Eng Technol 14:1095–1107
Wang X, Guo L. How to promote university students to innovative use renewable energy? An inquiry-based learning course model. Sustain. 2021.
Wade B, Griffiths A (2020) Examining best practice carbon management within Australian organisations: cases from contrasting sectors. Australas J Environ Manag 27:156–172
Linda T, Bhishna B (2015) Sustainable campus: engaging the community in sustainability. Int J Sustain High Educ 16:57–71
Leal Filho W, Sima M, Sharifi A et al (2021) Handling climate change education at universities: an overview. Environ Sci Eur 33:109
Peters D, van der Leun K, Terlouw W, et al. Gas Decarbonisation Pathways 2020–2050—Gas for Climate. Utrecht; 2020. Available from: https://gasforclimate2050.eu/sdm_downloads/2020-gas-decarbonisation-pathways-study/.
Donkor FK, Mearns K. Clean energy solutions and sustainable development. 2021; 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95864-4_123.
Zhou W, McCollum DL, Fricko O et al (2020) Decarbonization pathways and energy investment needs for developing Asia in line with ‘well below’ 2 °C. Clim Policy. 20:234–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1722606
Schandl H, Hatfield-Dodds S, Wiedmann T et al (2016) Decoupling global environmental pressure and economic growth: scenarios for energy use, materials use and carbon emissions. J Clean Prod 132:45–56
Leal Filho W, Yang P, Eustachio JHPP et al (2022) Deploying digitalisation and artificial intelligence in sustainable development research. Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02252-3
Mulholland E, Teter J, Cazzola P et al (2018) The long haul towards decarbonising road freight—a global assessment to 2050. Appl Energy 216:678–693
Yan S, de Bruin K, Dennehy E et al (2021) Climate policies for freight transport: energy and emission projections through 2050. Transp Policy 107:11–23
Höglund-Isaksson L, Gómez-Sanabria A, Klimont Z et al (2020) Technical potentials and costs for reducing global anthropogenic methane emissions in the 2050 timeframe—results from the GAINS model. Environ Res Commun. 2:025004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ab7457
Zhou W, McCollum DL, Fricko O et al (2019) A comparison of low carbon investment needs between China and Europe in stringent climate policy scenarios. Environ Res Lett 14:054017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab0dd8
Molthan-Hill P, Robinson ZP, Hope A et al (2020) Reducing carbon emissions in business through responsible management education: influence at the micro-, meso- and macro-levels. Int J Manag Educ. 18:100328
Leal Filho W, Morgan EA, Godoy ES et al (2018) Implementing climate change research at universities: barriers, potential and actions. J Clean Prod 170:269–277
Leal Filho W, Vidal DG, Chen C, et al. An assessment of requirements in investments, new technologies and infrastructures to achieve the SDGs. Environ Sci Eur. 2022.
Hernández-Diaz PM, Polanco J-A, Escobar-Sierra M et al (2021) Holistic integration of sustainability at universities: evidences from Colombia. J Clean Prod 305:127145
Leal Filho W, Shiel C, Paço A (2016) Implementing and operationalising integrative approaches to sustainability in higher education: the role of project-oriented learning. J Clean Prod 133:126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.079
Vasconcelos CRP, Ferreira P, Araújo M, et al. Students’ perception of campus sustainability in a Brazilian University. Univ Sustain Soc Support Implement Sustain Dev Goals. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg; 2021. p. 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63399-8_19.