Losses, gains, and brains: Neuroeconomics can help to answer open questions about loss aversion

Journal of Consumer Psychology - Tập 21 - Trang 453-463 - 2011
Scott Rick1
1Department of Marketing, Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, 701 Tappan Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Much is understood about loss aversion (the tendency for losses to have greater hedonic impact than comparable gains), but open questions remain. First, there is debate about whether loss aversion is best understood as the byproduct of a single system within the brain that treats losses and gains asymmetrically or the interaction of separate deliberative and emotional systems. Second, some have questioned whether loss aversion alone is the best account for the endowment effect. Alternative accounts, based on the differential focus induced by buying versus selling, the order in which buyers and sellers consider positive and negative aspects of the good, the extent to which ownership induces liking, and the desire to avoid making a bad deal, have been proposed. Third, it is unclear whether losses are actually experienced more intensely than comparable gains, or whether people simply behave as if they were. Some have argued that loss aversion is nothing more than an affective forecasting error, while others have argued that there are many situations in which losses are actually more impactful than comparable gains. This review synthesizes the insights that behavioral researchers and neuroeconomists have contributed to each debate, and highlights potential avenues for future research.


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1126/science.1104884 10.1002/mar.20004 10.1509/jmkr.46.3.372 10.1509/jmkr.42.2.134.62283 10.1257/089533005774357897 10.1207/s15327663jcp0603_03 10.1207/s15327663jcp0603_05 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.229 10.1207/s15327663jcp0603_04 10.2307/2118511 10.1016/j.geb.2004.10.004 10.1257/0002828043052222 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00303-8 10.1086/518545 10.1257/aer.98.4.1312 10.1016/j.jebo.2003.10.010 Burson K., 2009, Working paper 10.1017/CBO9780511549854 10.1509/jmkr.42.2.129.62286 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02033.x 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.027 10.1162/003355397555244 10.1257/0022051053737843 10.1257/aer.97.2.148 10.1086/317590 10.1086/374701 Chaiken S., 1999, Dual‐process theories in social psychology 10.1257/089533005775196750 10.1073/pnas.0910230107 De Martino B., 2009, The neurobiology of reference‐dependent value computation, Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 3833, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4832-08.2009 10.1073/pnas.0530279100 10.1509/jmkr.46.5.653 Egidi G., 2008, Handbook of consumer psychology, 1177 10.1126/science.1089134 10.1002/bdm.602 E.Ert I.Erev.On the descriptive value of loss aversion in decisions under risk.Harvard business school working paper 10‐056.2010. Figner B., 2010, Lateral prefrontal cortex and self‐control in intertemporal choice, Nature Neuroscience, 13, 523, 10.1038/nn.2516 10.1257/aer.96.5.1449 Gachter S., 2007, Working paper Gal D., 2006, A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion, Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 23, 10.1017/S1930297500000322 10.2307/1423318 Gehring W.J., 2002, The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses, Science, 295, 2279, 10.1126/science.1066893 Glimcher P.W., 2008, Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain, 1 10.1257/aer.97.2.142 10.1162/003355397555217 Gul F., 2008, The foundations of positive and normative economics, 3 10.1126/science.1140738 10.1287/mksc.12.4.378 10.1126/science.1168450 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3446-06.2006 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02031.x 10.1017/S0266267108002009 10.1509/jmkr.46.1.1 10.1002/bdm.692 10.1098/rstb.2004.1540 10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.23 10.1126/science.1115327 10.1509/jmkr.46.1.14 Huettel S.A., 2004, Functional magnetic resonance imaging 10.1016/j.jcps.2007.10.003 Johnson E.J., 2006, Working paper 10.1126/science.1091721 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.461 Kable J.W., 2007, The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice, Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 1625 Kahneman D., 1990, Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325, 10.1086/261737 10.1287/mnsc.39.1.17 10.2307/1914185 10.1162/003355397555235 Kardes F.R., 1994, Handbook of social cognition, 399 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01164.x Kermer D.A., 2006, Loss aversion is an affective forecasting error, Psychological Science, 17, 649, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01760.x 10.1126/science.1129156 10.1073/pnas.0911619106 10.1016/S1053-8119(02)00057-5 10.1098/rstb.2008.0155 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.010 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.05.018 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.008 10.1162/003355397555253 Loewenstein G. & O’Donoghue T. (2004). Animal spirits: Affective and deliberative processes in economic behavior.Working paper. Carnegie Mellon University. 10.1086/597160 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00679.x 10.1162/00335530360535144 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093710 10.1038/nature06976 10.1086/257177 10.1093/scan/nsp007 10.1126/science.1100907 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4246-06.2007 McGraw P. Larsen J. T. Kahneman D. and Schkade D. (in press). Comparing gains and losses. Psychological Science. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00455.x Metcalfe J., 1999, A hot/cool‐system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower, Psychological Review, 106, 3, 10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.014 10.1086/497550 10.1509/jmkr.42.2.119.62292 10.1001/archpsyc.62.3.282 10.1086/598614 10.1073/pnas.0706929105 10.1257/0002828054201387 10.1257/aer.97.4.1449 Poldrack R.A., 2006, Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 59, 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02460.x 10.2307/1962487 10.2307/3172907 Reb J., 2007, Possession, feelings of ownership and the endowment effect, Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 107, 10.1017/S1930297500000085 Rutledge R. and Glimcher P. (2009). Asymmetric BOLD responses to positive and negative outcomes. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroeconomics. 10.1007/BF00055564 10.1126/science.1082976 10.1006/obhd.1995.1071 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.10.001 10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70025-6 10.1086/209563 10.1086/425103 10.1073/pnas.0806761106 10.1017/S0140525X00003435 Strack F., 2005, Reflective and impulsive determinants of consumer behavior, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 205, 10.1207/s15327663jcp1603_2 10.1086/209539 10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7 10.1162/003355397555226 10.1126/science.1134239 10.1016/j.schres.2008.03.027 Tversky A., 1991, Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference‐dependent model, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039, 10.2307/2937956 Weaver R., 2008, Working paper 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.034 Weisberg D.S., 2008, The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 470, 10.1162/jocn.2008.20040 Yoon C., 2009, Using fMRI to inform marketing research: Challenges and opportunities, Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 17 10.1086/504132 Zak P.J., 2004, Neuroeconomics, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 359, 1737, 10.1098/rstb.2004.1544 10.1207/s15327663jcp1504_6