Location selection for logistics center with fuzzy SWARA and CoCoSo methods

Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems - Tập 38 Số 4 - Trang 4693-4709 - 2020
Alptekin Ulutaş1, Can Bülent Karakuş2, Ayşe Topal3
1Department of International Trade and Logistics, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey
2Department of City and Regional Planning, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey
3Department of Business, Nigde Omer Halisdemir University, Nigde, Turkey

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Altuntas, 2013, ing logistics centers: The evolution of industrial buying criteria towards green, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 29, 59, 10.1016/j.ajsl.2013.05.004

Uyanik C. , Tuzkaya G. and Oğuztimur S. , A Literature Survey On Logistics Centers’ Location Selection Problem, Sigma: Journal of Engineering & Natural Sciences/Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 36(1) (2018).

Awasthi, 2011, A multi-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 53, 98, 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.07.023

Van Thai, 2005, Selecting the location of distribution centre in logistics operations: A conceptual framework and case study, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 17, 3, 10.1108/13555850510672359

Cinar, 2010, A decision support model for bank branch location selection, International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 5, 846

Yazdani, 2019, A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems, Management Decision, 57, 2501, 10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458

Ghoseiri K. and Lessan J. , Location selection for logistic centers using a two-step fuzzy-AHP and ELECTRE method, In Proceedings of the 9th Asia Pasific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference, Indonesia, (2008), December, pp. 434–440.

Farahani, 2010, Multiple criteria facility location problems: A survey, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34, 1689, 10.1016/j.apm.2009.10.005

Turskis, 2010, A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS-F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location, Transport, 25, 423, 10.3846/transport.2010.52

Li, 2011, Selection of logistics center location using Axiomatic Fuzzy Set and TOPSIS methodology in logistics managemen, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 7901, 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.161

Elevli, 2014, Logistics freight center locations decision by using Fuzzy-PROMETHEE, Transport, 29, 412, 10.3846/16484142.2014.983966

Tadić, 2014, A novel hybrid MCDM model based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy VIKOR for city logistics concept selection, Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 8112, 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.021

Uysal, 2014, Selection of Logistics Centre Location via ELECTRE Method: A Case Study in Turkey, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5, 276

Yildirim, 2014, Evaluating potential freight villages in Istanbul using multi criteria decision making techniques, Journal of Logistics Management, 3, 1

Żak, 2014, The selection of the logistics center location based on MCDM/A methodology, Transportation Research Procedia, 3, 555, 10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.034

Rao, 2015, Location selection of city logistics centers under sustainability, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 36, 29, 10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.008

Özceylan, 2016, Evaluation of freight villages: A GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis, Computers in Industry, 76, 38, 10.1016/j.compind.2015.12.003

Komchornrit, 2017, The selection of dry port location by a hybrid CFA-MACBETH-PROMETHEE method: A case study of southern thailand, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 33, 141, 10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.09.004

Pham, 2017, Application of Fuzzy Delphi TOPSIS to locate logistics centers in Vietnam: The Logisticians’ perspective, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 33, 211, 10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.12.004

Zarali, 2018, AHP ve VIKOR Bütünleşik yaklaşimiyla Lojistik Merkez Yer Seçimi: Kayseri ili örneği, Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 34, 1

Liu, 2019, Optimization of fuzzy demand distribution supply chain using modified sequence quadratic programming approach, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 36, 6167, 10.3233/JIFS-181997

Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, 2018, A new hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluation of construction equipment with sustainability considerations, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 18, 32, 10.1016/j.acme.2017.04.011

Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, 2018, An extended step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis with symmetric interval type-2 fuzzy sets for determining the subjective weights of criteria in multi-criteria decision-making problems, Symmetry, 10, 91, 10.3390/sym10040091

Mavi, 2017, Sustainable third-party reverse logistic provider selection with fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy MOORA in plastic industry, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 91, 2401, 10.1007/s00170-016-9880-x

Zarbakhshnia, 2018, Sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider evaluation and selection using fuzzy SWARA and developed fuzzy COPRAS in the presence of risk criteria, Applied Soft Computing, 65, 307, 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.01.023

Cavallaro, 2019, Electric Vehicle Charging Station Site Selection by an Integrated Hesitant Fuzzy SWARA-WASPAS Method, Transformations in Business & Economics, 18, 103

Perçin, 2019, An integrated fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy AD approach for outsourcing provider selection, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30, 531, 10.1108/JMTM-08-2018-0247

Sadeghi, 2019, Developing a new assessment fuzzy model by focusing on improving the reliability of customers’ individual verbal judgment (An Internet Banking case study), Consumer Behavior Studies, 5, 55

Barua, 2019, Evaluation of Mechanical Behavior of Hybrid Natural Fiber Reinforced Nano SiC Particles Composite Using Hybrid Taguchi-COCOSO Method, International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8, 3341, 10.35940/ijitee.J1232.0881019

Yazdani, 2019, A grey combined compromise solution (CoCoSo-G) method for supplier selection in construction management, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 25, 858, 10.3846/jcem.2019.11309

10.3846/cibmee.2019.081

Zavadskas, 2011, Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: An overview, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17, 397, 10.3846/20294913.2011.593291

Zavadskas, 2014, State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20, 165, 10.3846/20294913.2014.892037

Poisson, 1996, Tectonic setting and evolution of the Sivas Basin, Central Anatolia, Turkey, International Geology Review, 38, 838, 10.1080/00206819709465366

Keršuliene, 2010, Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA), Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11, 243, 10.3846/jbem.2010.12

Chang, 1996, Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 649, 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2

Ian McHarg L. , Design with nature, New York: University of Pennsylvania, 1969.

Wang, 2009, Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: A case study in Beijing, China, Journal of environmental management, 90, 2414, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.008

Qu, 2019, Optimal strategy for a green supply chain considering shipping policy and default risk, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 131, 172, 10.1016/j.cie.2019.03.042