Local Consolidative Therapy Vs. Maintenance Therapy or Observation for Patients With Oligometastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Multi-Institutional, Phase II, Randomized Study

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) - Tập 37 Số 18 - Trang 1558-1565 - 2019
Daniel R. Gomez1, Chad Tang1, Jianjun Zhang1, George R. Blumenschein1, Mike Hernández1, J. Jack Lee1, Rong Ye1, David A. Palma2, Alexander V. Louie2, D. Ross Camidge3, Robert C. Doebele3, Ferdinandos Skoulidis1, Laurie E. Gaspar3, James W. Welsh1, Don L. Gibbons1, José A. Karam1, Brian D. Kavanagh3, Anne S. Tsao1, Boris Sepesi1, Stephen G. Swisher1, John V. Heymach1
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
2London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada
3University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO

Tóm tắt

PURPOSE Our previously published findings reported that local consolidative therapy (LCT) with radiotherapy or surgery improved progression-free survival (PFS) and delayed new disease in patients with oligometastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that did not progress after front-line systemic therapy. Herein, we present the longer-term overall survival (OS) results accompanied by additional secondary end points. PATIENTS AND METHODS This multicenter, randomized, phase II trial enrolled patients with stage IV NSCLC, three or fewer metastases, and no progression at 3 or more months after front-line systemic therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to maintenance therapy or observation (MT/O) or to LCT to all active disease sites. The primary end point was PFS; secondary end points were OS, toxicity, and the appearance of new lesions. All analyses were two sided, and P values less than .10 were deemed significant. RESULTS The Data Safety and Monitoring Board recommended early trial closure after 49 patients were randomly assigned because of a significant PFS benefit in the LCT arm. With an updated median follow-up time of 38.8 months (range, 28.3 to 61.4 months), the PFS benefit was durable (median, 14.2 months [95% CI, 7.4 to 23.1 months] with LCT v 4.4 months [95% CI, 2.2 to 8.3 months] with MT/O; P = .022). We also found an OS benefit in the LCT arm (median, 41.2 months [95% CI, 18.9 months to not reached] with LCT v 17.0 months [95% CI, 10.1 to 39.8 months] with MT/O; P = .017). No additional grade 3 or greater toxicities were observed. Survival after progression was longer in the LCT group (37.6 months with LCT v 9.4 months with MT/O; P = .034). Of the 20 patients who experienced progression in the MT/O arm, nine received LCT to all lesions after progression, and the median OS was 17 months (95% CI, 7.8 months to not reached). CONCLUSION In patients with oligometastatic NSCLC that did not progress after front-line systemic therapy, LCT prolonged PFS and OS relative to MT/O.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.44

10.1200/JCO.1995.13.1.8

10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3501

10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30532-0

10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4853

10.1093/jnci/djx015

10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.105

10.2307/2529712

10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8181

10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61497-5

10.1200/jco.2011.29.18_suppl.cra7510

10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70112-1

10.1007/978-1-4757-3294-8

10.1038/nature14347

10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.025

10.1038/nature14292

10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.012

10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.400

10.1016/j.jtho.2018.05.019