Lipid levels and the risk of dementia: A dose–response meta‐analysis of prospective cohort studies

Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology - Tập 9 Số 3 - Trang 296-311 - 2022
Ying Zhu1, Xu Liu1, Ruixia Zhu1, Jingjing Zhao1, Qianwen Wang1
1Department of Neurology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China

Tóm tắt

AbstractObjectivesWe performed a dose–response meta‐analysis to estimate the association between lipid profiles with the risk of dementia and the potential differences according to the subtype of dementia based on prospective studies.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for relevant articles and performed a meta‐analysis. We applied fixed or random‐effects models to calculate pooled relative risk (RR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). The dose–response relationship was assessed by restricted cubic spline.ResultsTwenty‐five prospective studies comprising 362,443 participants and 20,121 cases were included in the final analysis. We found that increased risk of all‐cause dementia could be predicted by elevated total cholesterol (TC) (RR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.04–1.22). When looking at dementia subtypes, we also observed high TC and triglycerides (TG) may increase the future risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD), with a pooled RR of 1.13 (95% CI: 1.06–1.21) and 1.10 (95% CI: 1.04–1.15) respectively. Moreover, a dose–response analysis revealed a linear association between TC or TG and the risk of AD, with a pooled RR of 1.09 (95% CI: 1.02–1.16) and 1.12 (95% CI: 1.05–1.21) for per 3‐mmol/L increment in TC and TG, respectively.ConclusionsCurrent evidence suggest that every 3‐mmol/L increase in blood TC or TG is linearly associated with a 9% or 12% increase in RR of AD, supporting the notion that high TC and TG levels appear to play a causal role in the development of AD.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.007

10.1016/j.arr.2020.101045

10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04839.x

10.1097/00005072-199303000-00006

10.1002/jnr.10585

10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05415.x

10.1016/j.jns.2012.07.002

10.1016/j.mcn.2010.08.001

10.1136/bmj.322.7300.1447

10.1159/000026149

10.1016/j.eurger.2014.05.002

10.3389/fneur.2019.00441

10.1001/archinte.163.9.1053

10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181feb2bf

10.1212/01.wnl.0000178989.87072.11

10.1136/jech.2009.100826

10.1001/archneurol.2010.297

10.1038/s41398-020-0822-x

10.3389/fnagi.2020.00005

10.3233/JAD-160826

10.1038/s41398-018-0336-y

10.1186/s13195-020-00690-7

10.1371/journal.pmed.1002265

10.1111/jgs.15581

10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007

10.1001/jama.283.15.2008

10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z

10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036298

10.1136/bmj.d6617

10.1093/aje/kwn005

10.1093/aje/kwr265

10.1002/sim.1186

10.2307/2533446

10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x

Tobias A, 1999, Assessing the influence of a single study in the meta‐analysis estimate, Stata Tech Bull, 8, 15

10.2337/dc08-0272

10.3233/JAD-121228

10.1001/archneur.61.5.705

10.1159/000115847

10.1212/WNL.53.7.1593

10.1212/01.WNL.0000144281.38555.E3

10.1212/01.WNL.0000161870.78572.A5

10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181feb2bf

10.1212/WNL.45.6.1161

10.1007/s00406-013-0468-2

10.1002/ana.410400111

10.1093/gerona/glt286

10.1001/jama.282.3.254

10.1159/000017045

10.1097/01.JGP.0000310778.20870.ae

2019, Risk Reduction of Cognitive Decline and Dementia

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.044

10.1001/archneur.57.6.869

10.1161/01.ATV.0000095973.42032.44

10.1212/01.WNL.0000150886.50187.30

10.1006/nbdi.2000.0304

10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00174.x

10.1038/s41598-018-24248-8