Linking Knowledge to Productivity: A Germany-Italy Comparison Using the CIS Database

Francesca Lotti1,2, Enrico Santarelli3
1Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, U.S.A
2Scuola Superiore di Studi Universitari e di Perfezionamento S. Anna, Pisa, Italy
3Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Universitá di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Tóm tắt

This paper employs micro-aggregated data from the FirstCommunity Innovation Survey for assessing the contribution of the level and type of R & D spending, the purchase of new machinerywith embodied technological change, economies of scale, and information sharing with client and suppliers to productivity(total sales per employee) in German and Italian firms in 20 manufacturing industries. The regression analysis confirms theresults of previous studies that R & D and technological change embodied in new machinery and capital equipment aremajor factors affecting productivity at the firm level. However, the elasticity of productivity to both R & D and embodiedtechnological change is higher in Germany than in Italy. Conversely, information sharing with clients and suppliersrelated to innovation projects does not result in higher productivity, with the exception of a few industries (inparticular those producing traditional consumer goods) in Germany.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Altmann, N., Kohler, C., and Meil, P. (eds) (1992) Technology and Work in German Industry, London & New York: Routledge.

Amendola, G., Dosi, G., and Papagni, E. (1993) ‘The Dynamics of International Competitiveness’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiw 129(3), 451–471.

Archibugi, D., Cohendet, P., Kristensen, A., and Schaffer, K.-A. (1994) Evaluation of the Community Innovation Survey (CIS) – Phase I, EIMS (European Innovation Monitoring System), Publication 11.

Arrow, K.J. (1973) ‘Information and Economic Behaviour’, in Collected Papers of K.J. Arrow, No. 4, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 136–152.

Audretsch, D., Santarelli, E., and Vivarelli, M. (1999) ‘Start-up Size and Industrial Dynamics: Some Evidence from Italian Manufacturing’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 17(7), 965–983.

Belsley, D., Kuh, E., and Welsch, R.E. (1980), Regression Diagnostics, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Brusco, S. (1986) ‘Small Firms and Industrial Districts: The Experience of Italy’, in D. Keeble and E. Weve, eds., New Firms and Regional Development, London: Croom Helm.

Brouwer, E. and Kleinknecht, A. (1999) ‘Innovative Output, and a Firm's Propensity to Patent’, Research Policy 28(5), 615–624.

Clark, K.B. and Griliches, Z. (1984) ‘Productivity Growth and R&D at the Business Level: Results from the PIMS Database’, in Z. Griliches, ed., pp. 393–416.

Cohen, W.H. and Levinthal, D.A. (1989) ‘Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D’, Economic Journal 99(3), 569–596.

Colombo, M. and Mosconi, R. (1995) ‘Complementarity and Cumulative Learning Effects in the Early Diffusion of Multiple Technologies’, Journal of Industrial Economics 43(1), 13–48.

De Long, B.J. and Summers, L.H. (1991) ‘Equipment Investment and Economic Growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(2), 445–502.

Dosi, G., Pavitt, K., and Soete, L. (1990) The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade, New York: New York University Press (distributed by Columbia University Press).

Griliches, Z. (1979) ‘Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth’, Bell Journal of Economics 10(1), 92–116.

Griliches, Z. (1984) ‘Market Value, R&D, and Patents’, in Id, ed., pp. 249–252.

Griliches, Z. (ed.) (1984) R&D, Patents, and Productivity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press for NBER.

Griliches, Z. (1990) ‘Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey’, Journal of Economic Literature 28, 1661–1707.

Griliches, Z. and Mairesse, J. (1984), ‘Productivity and R&D at the Firm Level’, in Z. Griliches, ed., pp. 339–374.

Gruber, H. (1998) ‘The Diffusion of Innovations in Protected Industries: The Textile Industry’, Applied Economics 30(1), 77–83.

Guerrieri, P. and Tylecote, A. (1994) ‘National Competitive Advantage and Microeconomic Behavior’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 3(1), 49–76.

Hadi, A.S. and Wells, M.T. (1990) ‘Assessing the Effects of Multiple Rows on the Condition Number of a Matrix’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 85(411), 786–792.

Hall, B., Griliches, Z., and Hausman, J.A. (1986) ‘Patents and R&D: Is There a Lag?’, International Economic Review 27(3), 265–283.

Harhoff, D. (1998) ‘Are There Financing Constraints for R&D and Investment in German Manufacturing Firms?’, Annales d'Economie et de Statistique 49/50, 421–450.

Humbert, M. (ed.) (1988) Etude Globale sur l'Electronique Mondiale, Rennes, GERDIC-Université de Rennes I.

Klette, T.J. (1996) ‘R&D, Scope Economies, and Plant Performance’, The Rand Journal of Economics 27(3), 502–522.

Kohler, C. and Schmierl, K. (1991) ‘Diffusion of CIM-Technologies and Trends in Work Organization’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 2(2), 381–394.

Leoncini, R., Maggioni, M.A., and Montresor, S. (1996) ‘Intersectoral Innovation Flows and National Technological Systems: Network Analysis for Comparing Italy and Germany’, Research Policy 25(3), 45–430.

Lundvall, B.A. (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter.

Mairesse, J. and Sassenou, M. (1991) ‘R&D and Productivity: A Survey of Econometric Studies at the Firm Level’, STI-Review 8(1), 9–46.

Malerba, F. (1993) ‘The National System of Innovation: Italy’, in R.R. Nelson, ed., National Innovation Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mowery, D.C. and Rosenberg, N. (1979) ‘The Influence of Market Demand Upon Innovation: A Critical Review of Some Recent Empirical Studies’, Research Policy 8(2), 103–153.

Lundvall, B.A. (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter.

Pantiglioni, B. and Santarelli, E. (1998) ‘R&S e competitività internazionale in Europa: un'analisi settoriale’, Economia Internazionale 51(1), 47–62.

Pavitt, K. (1984), ‘Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory’, Research Policy 13(4), 343–373.

Santarelli, E. and Sterlacchini, A. (1990) ‘Innovation, Formal Vs. Informal R&D, and Firm Size. Some Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Firms’, Small Business Economics 2(3), 223–228.

Santarelli, E. and Sterlacchini, A. (1994) ‘Embodied Technological Change in Supplier Dominated Firms’, Empirica 21(3), 313–327.

Scott, M.F. (1989) A New View of Economic Growth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sengupta, D. and Bhimasankaram, P. (1997) ‘On the Roles of Observations in Collinearity in the Linear Model’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 92(439), 1024–1997.

Silvey, S.D. (1969) ‘Multicollinearity and Imprecise Estimation’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 31, 539–552.

Sterlacchini, A. (1998), ‘Inputs and Outputs of Innovative Activities in Italian Manufacturing’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7(6), 323–344.

VonHippel, E. (1989) The Sources of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

White, H. (1980) ‘A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity’, Econometrica 48(4), 817–838.

Wolf, H.C. (1994) ‘Growth Convergence Reconsidered’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 130(4), 747–759.