Lifestyle decisions and climate mitigation: current action and behavioural intent of youth

Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t Ajzen I (2002) Constructing a TpB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2020 Albrecht G (2011) Chronic environmental change: emerging ‘psychoterratic’ syndromes. In: Weissbecker I (ed) Climate Change and Human Well-being: Global Challenges and Opportunities. New York, pp 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9742-5_3 Baiocchi G, Minx J, Hubacek K (2010) The impact of social factors and consumer behavior on carbon dioxide emissions in the United Kingdom. J Ind Ecol 14:50–72 Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84(2):191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 Barr S, Gilg AW (2007) A conceptual framework for understanding and analyzing attitudes towards environmental behaviour. Geogr Ann Ser B 89(4):361–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00266.x Bland HW, Melton BF, Welle P, Bigham L (2012) Stress tolerance: new challenges for millennial college students. J Coll Stud Dev 46(2):362–375 Blasche J, Ketelaar PE (2015) The synergy in green persuasion: green celebrity endorsers in green advertising: a study of brand-endorser congruence effects in green advertising. Eur J Mark 24:86–106 Bulkeley H (2000) Common Knowledge? Public Understanding of Climate Change in Newcastle, Australia. Public Underst Sci 9:313–333 Caillaud S, Kalampalikis N (2013) Focus groups and ecological practices: a psychosocial approach. Qual Res Psychol 10(4):382–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2012.674176 CDC (Centers for Disease control and Prevention) (1996) Guidelines for School Health Programs to Promote Lifelong Healthy Eating. MMWR. 45: 1–37 Chan K, Yu LN, Luk EK (2013) Impact of celebrity endorsement in advertising on brand image among Chinese adolescents. Young Consum 14(2):167–179. https://doi.org/10.1108/17473611311325564 Clayton S (2020) Climate anxiety: Psychological responses to climate change. J Anxiety Disord. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102263 Cliceri D, Spinelli S, Dinnella C, Prescott J, Monteleone E (2018) The influence of psychological traits, beliefs and taste responsiveness on implicit attitudes toward plant- and animal-based dishes among vegetarians, flexitarians and omnivores. Food Qual Prefer 68:276–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.03.020 Cooper PJ, Goodyer I (1997) Prevalence and significance of weight and shape concerns in girls aged 11–16 years. Br J Psychiatry 171(6):542–544. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.171.6.542 Cox DA (2019). The decline of religion in American family life. American Enterprise Institute. https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/the-decline-of-religion-in-american-family-life. Accessed 12 June 2020 Dhont K, Hodson G (2014) Why do right-wing adherents engage in more animal exploitation and meat consumption? Pers Individ Differ 64:12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.002 Dietz T, Gardner GT, Gilligan J, Stern PC, Vandenbergh MP (2009) Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. PNAS 106(44):18452–18456. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908738106 Elections Canada (2019) Official voting results forty-third general election. https://www.elections.ca/res/rep/off/ovr2019app/home.html. Accessed 8 April 2020 Elgaaied-Gambiera L, Monnota E, Reniou F (2018) Using descriptive norm appeals effectively to promote green behavior. J Bus Res 82:179–191 Festinger L (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Vol. 2). California, Stanford university press Fielding KS, Head BW (2012) Determinants of young Australians’ environmental actions: The role of responsibility attributions, locus of control, knowledge and attitudes. Environ Educ Res 18(2):171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.592936 Fox N, Ward K (2008) Health, ethics and environment: A qualitative study of vegetarian motivations. Appetite 50(2–3):422–429 Gardner GT, Stern PC (2008) The Short List: The Most Effective Actions US Households Can Take to Curb Climate Change. Environ Sci Policy 50(5):12–25. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.50.5.12-25 Gehlbach H, Artino AR (2018) The survey checklist (manifesto) [Perspective]. Acad Med 93(3):360–366. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002083 Gidley JM, Bateman D, Smith C, Slaughter RA (2004) Futures in education: Principles, practice and potential Series 5. Swinburne University, Melbourne, p 94 Gifford R (2011) The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am Psychol 66(4):290–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566 Girod B, Vuuren DPV, Hertwich EG (2014) Climate policy through changing consumption choices: Options and obstacles for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Glob Environ Change 25:5–15 Government of Canada (2020) Electric vehicle and alternative fuel infrastructure deployment initiative. https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy-efficiency/energy-efficiency-transportation/electric-vehicle-alternative-fuels-infrastructure-deployment-initiative/18352. Accessed 3 June 2020 Green J, Steinbach R, Garnett E, Christie N, Prior L (2018) Automobility reconfigured? Ironic seductions and mundane freedoms in 16–21 year olds’ accounts of car driving and ownership. Mobilities 13(1):14–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2017.1331017 Gromet DM, Kunreuther H, Larrick RP (2013) Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. PNAS 110(23):9314–9319. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218453110 Guth JL, Green JC, Kellstedt LA, Smidt CE (1995) Faith and the environment: religious beliefs and attitudes on environmental policy. Am J Polit Sci 39:364–382 Halvorson B (2020) Cost remains the biggest barrier against EV adoption, study finds. https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1126706_cost-remains-the-biggest-barrier-against-ev-adoption-study-finds. Accessed 3 June 2020 Hine DW, Gifford R (1996) Individual restraint and group efficiency in commons dilemmas: the effects of two types of environmental uncertainty. J Appl Soc Psychol 26(11):993–1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01121.x Inoue Y, Kent A (2012) Sport teams as promoters of pro-environmental behavior: an empirical study. J Sport Manag 26(5):417–432. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.26.5.417 IPCC (2018) Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (Rep) Masson- Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla P, et al. (eds) Kamins MA, Gupta K (1994) Congruence between spokesperson and product type: A matchup hypothesis perspective. Psychol Mark 11(6):569–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220110605 Khalid NL, Jayasainan SY, Hassim N (2018) Social media influencers - shaping consumption culture among Malaysian youth. International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences 53:02008. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185302008 Lacroix K (2018) Comparing the relative mitigation potential of individual pro-environmental behaviors. J Clean Prod 195:1398–1407 Leeuw AD, Valois P, Ajzen I, Schmidt P (2015) Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. J Environ Psychol 42:128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.005 Leiserowitz A, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C, Feinberg G, Rosenthal S (2014) Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans’ Global Warming Beliefs and Attitudes in April 2013. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2298705 Lipka M (2018) 5 facts about religion in Canada. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/07/01/5-facts-about-religion-in-canada. Accessed 8 April 2020 Liu X, Stoutenborough J, Vedlitz A (2017) Bureaucratic expertise, overconfidence, and policy choice. Governance 30(4):705–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12257 Maki A, Burns RJ, Ha L, Rothman AJ (2016) Paying people to protect the environment: A meta-analysis of financial incentive interventions to promote proenvironmental behaviors. J Environ Psychol 47:242–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.07.006 Martin CA, Bush AJ (2000) Do role models influence teenagers’ purchase intentions and behavior? J Consum Mark 17(5):441–453. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760010341081 Mcneill KL, Vaughn MH (2010) Urban High School Students’ Critical Science Agency: Conceptual Understandings and Environmental Actions Around Climate Change. J Res Sci Teach 42(2):373–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9202-5 Melnyk V, Van Herpen E, Van Trijp H (2010) The Influence of Social Norms in Consumer Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis. In: Campbell MC, Inman J, Pieters R (Eds) Advances in Consumer Research, Vol 37. Duluth, MN, pp 463–464 Moran D, Wood R, Hertwich E, Mattson K, Rodriguez JFD, Schanes K, Barrett J (2020) Quantifying the potential for consumer-oriented policy to reduce European and foreign carbon emissions. Clim Policy 20:S28–S38. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1551186 Morrison M, Duncan R, Parton K (2015) Religion Does Matter for Climate Change Attitudes and Behavior. PloS One 10(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134868 Mostafa MM (2016) Post-materialism, Religiosity, Political Orientation, Locus of Control and Concern for Global Warming: A Multilevel Analysis Across 40 Nations. Soc Indic Res 128(3):1273–1298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1079-2 Munoz-Carrier G, Thomsen D, Pickering GJ (2020) Psychological and experiential factors affecting climate change perception: learnings from a transnational empirical study and implications for framing climate-related flood events. Environ Res Commun 2:045003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ab89f9 Murtaugh PA, Schlax MG (2009) Reproduction and the carbon legacies of individuals. Glob Environ Change 19(1):14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.007 Nielsen KS, Cologna V, Lange F, Brick C, Stern PC (2021) The case for impact focused environmental psychology. J Environ Psychol, 101559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101559 Pacala S, Socolow R (2004) Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305:968–972 Palupi T, Sawitri DR (2018) The importance of pro-environmental behavior in adolescent. Web Conf 31:09031. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183109031 Parizeau K, von Massow M, Martin R (2015) Household-level dynamics of food waste production and related beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours in Guelph, Ontario. Waste Manage 35:207–217 Pearce LD, Hayward GM, Pearlman JA (2017) Measuring five dimensions of religiosity across adolescence. Rev Relig Res 59(3):367–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-017-0291-8 Pedersen RL, Lam DP (2018) Second comment on ‘The climate mitigation gap: Education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions.’ Environ Res Lett 13(6):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac9d0 Peters E, Västfjäll D, Slovic P, Mertz C, Mazzocco K, Dickert S (2006) Numeracy and Decision Making. Psychol Sci 17(5):407–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x Pew Research Center (2018) Young adults around the world are less religious by several measures. https://www.pewforum.org/2018/06/13/young-adults-around-the-world-are-less-religious-by-several-measures. Accessed 12 June 2020 Pickering G (2015) Head in the (oil) sand? climate change scepticism in Canada. Enviro Soc Sci 2(2):1–11 Pickering GJ, Pickering HM, Northcotte A, Habermebl C (2020a) Participation in residential organic waste diversion programs: Motivators and optimizing educational messaging. Resour Conserv Recycl 158:104807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104807 Pickering GJ, Schoen K, Botta M, Fazio Z (2020) Exploration of youth knowledge and perceptions of individual-level climate mitigation action. Environ Res Lett 15:104080 Poortinga W, Spence A, Whitmarsh L, Capstick S, Pidgeon NF (2011) Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Glob Environ Change 21(3):1015–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.001 Prochaska JO, Velicer WF (1997) The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot 12(1):38–48. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38 Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Evers KE (2008) The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K (Eds) Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice 4th edn. San Francisco, CA, pp 97–121 Rutjens B, Sutton R, Van der Lee R (2018) Not all skepticism is equal: exploring the ideological antecedents of science acceptance and rejection. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 44(3):384–405 Sarabia L (2020) Canada's EV charging networks are growing at pace, but more is needed. https://electricautonomy.ca/2020/03/02/canadas-ev-charging-networks-2020. Accessed 3 June 2020 Schanes K, Dobernig K, Gözet B (2018) Food waste matters - A systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications. J Clean Prod 182:978–991 Shi J, Visschers VHM, Siegrist M, Arvai J (2016) Knowledge as a driver of public perceptions about climate change reassessed. Nature Clim Change 6:759–762. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2997 Smith N, Leiserowitz A (2013) American evangelicals and global warming. Glob Environ Change 23(5):1009–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.001 Sparrow J (2019) The car culture that’s helping destroy the planet was by no means inevitable. https://lithub.com/the-car-culture-thats-helping-destroy-the-planet-was-by-no-means-inevitable. Accessed 12 June 2020 Stafford R, Jones PJ (2019) Viewpoint – Ocean plastic pollution: A convenient but distracting truth? Mar Policy 103:187–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.02.003 Statista (2016) Meat consumption in Canada from 2013–2015. https://www.statista.com/statistics/521135/meat-consumption-canada. Accessed 12 June 2020 Stea S, Pickering GJ (2018) Optimizing messaging to reduce red meat consumption. Environ Commun 13(5):633–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1412994 Stern PC, Wolske KS (2017) Limiting climate change: What’s most worth doing? Environ Res Lett 12(9):1–2. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa8467 Stoutenborough JW, Vedlitz A (2014) The effect of perceived and assessed knowledge of climate change on public policy concerns: An empirical comparison. Enivron Sci Policy 37:23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.002 Tjernström E, Tietenberg T (2008) Do differences in attitudes explain differences in national climate change policies? Ecol Econ 65(2):315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.019 Tobler C, Visschers VH, Siegrist M (2011) Eating green. Consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors. Appetite 57(3):674–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.08.010 Tonglet M, Phillips PS, Bates MP (2004) Determining the drivers for householder pro-environmental behaviour: waste minimisation compared to recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 42:27–48 Tonn B, Macgregor D (2009) Individual approaches to futures thinking and decision making. Futures 41(3):117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2008.09.010 United Nations (2020). Emissions Gap Report 2020. United Nations Environment Programme. Nairobi. https://www.unep.org/emissions-gap-report-2020. Accessed 29 June 2021 Van De Ven D-J, González-Eguino M, Arto I (2018) The potential of behavioural change for climate change mitigation: a case study for the European Union. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 23:853–886 Wardle J, Haase AM, Steptoe A, Nillapun M, Jonwutiwes K, Bellisie F (2004) Gender differences in food choice: The contribution of health beliefs and dieting. Ann Behav Med 27(2):107–116. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2702_5 Whitmarsh L, Seyfang G, O’Neill S (2011) Public engagement with carbon and climate change: To what extent is the public ‘carbon capable’? Glob Environ Change 21(1):56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.011 Wynes S, Nicholas KA (2017) The climate mitigation gap: Education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environ Res Lett (12). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541 Wynes S, Nicholas KA (2018) Reply to Comment on ‘The climate mitigation gap: Education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions.’ Environ Res Lett 13(4):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab210 Wynes S, Nicholas KA (2019) Climate science curricula in Canadian secondary schools focus on human warming, not scientific consensus, impacts or solutions. PloS One 14(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218305 Wynes S, Zhao J, Donner SD (2020) How well do people understand the climate impact of individual actions? Climatic Change 162(3):1521–1534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02811-5