Lifelong learning and SMEs: issues for research and policy

Emerald - 2002
SteveJohnson1
1Principal Research Fellow, Policy Research Institute, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK.

Tóm tắt

Research evidence suggests that SMEs are significantly less likely than larger employers to provide or fund formal training leading to qualifications for employees. The training (or more accurately learning) that does take place in most SMEs tends to be informal, on‐the‐job and related to short‐term business objectives or problems. There are strong arguments to suggest that this type of approach is perfectly rational from the point of view of the small business, but may not produce the optimum level or mix of skills for the economy as a whole. Moreover, there is little convincing evidence to suggest that increased investment in formal training leads automatically to improved business performance for SMEs. Research findings raise a number of issues for policy makers and others who are trying to promote the concept of lifelong learning, and associated policy initiatives, to those who own, manage and/or work in SMEs. This paper suggests a number of directions that should be taken by researchers’ policy makers, to promote lifelong learning among SMEs.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Campbell, M. (1999), Learning Pays and Learning Works: A Review of the Economic Benefits of Learning, Report to NACETT.

Curran, J., Blackburn, R., Kitching, J. and North, J. (1996), Establishing Small Firms’ Training Practices, Needs, Difficulties and Use of Industry Training Organisations, DfEE, London.

Curran, J., Blackburn, R., Kitching, J. and North, J. (1997), “Small firms and workforce training: some results, analysis and policy implications” in Ram, M., Deakins, D. and Smallbone, D. (Eds), Small Firms: Enterprising Futures, Paul Chapman Publishing, London.

Cushion, N. (1996), “Measuring the success of small business management training”, presented to 18th National Small Firms Policy and Research Conference.

DfEE (1999), Learning to Succeed: a New Framework for Post‐16 Learning, White Paper, Cmnd. 4392, HMSO, London, June.

DfEE (2000), Opportunity for All: Skills for the New Economy, DfEE, Nottingham.

Hendry, C., Jones, A., Arthur, M. and Pettigrew, A. (1991), Human Resource Development in Small to Medium Sized Enterprises, Research Paper No. 88, Department of Employment, London.

IFF Research (1998), Skill Needs in Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Report to DfEE/T&EA, DfEE, Nottingham.

IFF Research (2000), Learning and Training at Work 1999, Research Report RR202, DfEE, Nottingham.

Johnson, S. (1999), Skills Issues in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises, National Skills Task Force Research Paper 13, DfEE, Nottingham.

Johnson, S. and Gubbins, A. (1993), “Training in small and medium sized enterprises: lessons from North Yorkshire” in Caley, K., Chell, E, Chittenden, F. and Mason, C. (Eds), Small Enterprise Development Policy and Practice, Paul Chapman Publishing, London.

Johnson, S., Campbell, M. and Devins, D. (2000), The Value of Training, report to NACETT.

Johnson, S., Smallbone, D. and Froud, M. (1998), “Policy support for established micro enterprises: the need for a segmented approach” presented to 21st National Small Firms Policy and Research Conference, Durham.

Matlay, H. (1996) “Paradox resolved? Owner‐manager attitudes to, and actual provision of, training in the small business sector of the British economy”, presented to 19th ISBA Small Firms Policy and Research Conference.

National Skills Task Force (2000a), Skills for All: Proposals for a National Skills Agenda, DfEE, Nottingham.

National Skills Task Force (2000b) Skills for All: Research Report, DfEE, Nottingham.

Storey, D. and Westhead, P. (1994), “Management training and small firm performance: why is the link so weak?”, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 13‐24.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Thông tin tác giả