Life cycle energy and emission analysis of remanufacturing starters for passenger cars
Tóm tắt
Remanufacturing retired auto parts with high added value can save various resources and provide good environmental benefits. This paper uses GREET2021 software to analyze and calculate the energy consumption of the life cycle, the primary energy consumption in each stage, quantify the emission of greenhouse gas and standard pollutants of a small internal combustion engine (ICE) passenger car with remanufacturing starter, and conducts a comparison study with a small ICE passenger car equipped with a new starter based on life cycle assessment. Results show that a small ICE passenger car with a remanufacturing starter consumes 40 kJ less energy per 100 km, emits 0.2 g less CO2, and emits 0.005 g less PM2.5 and PM10 than a small ICE passenger car with a new starter. The uncertainty analysis shows the fuel production phase has the highest uncertainty of 67.6% for CO2 emissions over the life cycle of passenger cars. The sensitivity analysis shows that a small ICE passenger car with remanufacturing starter is less sensitive in terms of life cycle energy consumption, primary energy consumption, and major pollutant emissions.
Tài liệu tham khảo
OICA (2022) Production statistics. https://www.oica.net/category/productionstatistics/2021-statistics/. Accessed 10 April 2023
OICA (2022) Sales statistics. https://www.oica.net/category/sales-statistics/. Accessed 10 April 2023
Danilecki K, Eliasz J, Smurawski P, Stanek W, Szlęk A (2021) Modeling inventory and environmental impacts of car maintenance and repair: a case study of Ford Focus passenger car. J Clean Prod 315:128085
Patwa N, Sivarajah U, Seetharaman A, Sarkar S, Maiti K, Hingorani K (2021) Towards a circular economy: an emerging economies context. J Bus Res 122:725–735
Saidani M, Yannou B, Leroy Y, Cluzel F (2020) Dismantling, remanufacturing and recovering heavy vehicles in a circular economy—technico-economic and organisational lessons learnt from an industrial pilot study. Resour Conserv Recycl 156:104684
Zhang X, Zhang M, Zhang H, Jiang Z, Liu C, Cai W (2020) A review on energy, environment and economic assessment in remanufacturing based on life cycle assessment method. J Clean Prod 255:120160
Peng S, Ping J, Li T, Wang F, Zhang H, Liu C (2022) Environmental benefits of remanufacturing mechanical products: a harmonized meta-analysis of comparative life cycle assessment studies. J Environ Manag 306:114479
Fofou RF, Jiang Z, Wang Y (2021) A review on the lifecycle strategies enhancing remanufacturing. Appl Sci 11(13):5937
Peña C, Civit B, Gallego-Schmid A, Druckman A, Pires AC, Weidema B, Motta W (2021) Using life cycle assessment to achieve a circular economy. Int J Life Cycle Assess 26(2):215–220
Kousemaker TM, Jonker GH, Vakis AI (2021) LCA practices of plastics and their recycling: a critical review. Appl Sci 11(8):3305
Peters K (2016) Methodological issues in life cycle assessment for remanufactured products: a critical review of existing studies and an illustrative case study. J Clean Prod 126:21–37
Zhao E, Walker PD, Surawski NC (2022) Emissions life cycle assessment of diesel, hybrid and electric buses. Proc Insti Mech Eng Part D 236(6):1233–1245
Marmiroli B, Venditti M, Dotelli G, Spessa E (2020) The transport of goods in the urban environment: a comparative life cycle assessment of electric, compressed natural gas and diesel light-duty vehicles. Appl Energy 260:114236
Warsen J, Laumer M, Momberg W (2011) Comparative life cycle assessment of remanufacturing and new manufacturing of a manual transmission. Glocalized solutions for sustainability in manufacturing: proceedings of the 18th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering. Springer, pp 67–72
Lee JH, Kang HY, Kim YW, Hwang YW, Kwon SG, Park HW, Choi HH (2023) Analysis of the life cycle environmental impact reductions of remanufactured turbochargers. J Remanuf 13(2):187–206
Zheng H, Li E, Wang Y, Shi P, Xu B, Yang S (2019) Environmental life cycle assessment of remanufactured engines with advanced restoring technologies. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 59:213–221
Zhang Z, Matsubae K, Nakajima K (2021) Impact of remanufacturing on the reduction of metal losses through the life cycles of vehicle engines. Resour Conserv Recycl 170:105614
Yu M, Bai B, Xiong S, Liao X (2021) Evaluating environmental impacts and economic performance of remanufacturing electric vehicle lithium-ion batteries. J Clean Prod 321:128935
Ternel C, Bouter A, Melgar J (2021) Life cycle assessment of mid-range passenger cars powered by liquid and gaseous biofuels: comparison with greenhouse gas emissions of electric vehicles and forecast to 2030. Transp Res Part D 97:102897
Naranjo GPS, Bolonio D, Ortega MF, García-Martínez MJ (2021) Comparative life cycle assessment of conventional, electric and hybrid passenger vehicles in Spain. J Clean Prod 291:125883
Petrauskienė K, Skvarnavičiūtė M, Dvarionienė J (2020) Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of electric and conventional vehicles in Lithuania. J Clean Prod 246:119042
Zhang J, Ke X, Gu Y, Wang F, Zheng D, Shen K, Yuan C (2022) Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries for sustainable design and manufacturing. Int J Life Cycle Assess 27(2):227–237
Shi S, Zhang H, Yang W, Zhang Q, Wang X (2019) A life-cycle assessment of battery electric and internal combustion engine vehicles: a case in Hebei Province, China. J Clean Prod 228:606–618
Yeow LW, Yan Y, Cheah L (2022) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of alternative fuels and powertrains for medium-duty trucks: a Singapore case study. Transp Res Part D 105:103258
Kambly KR, Bradley TH (2014) Estimating the HVAC energy consumption of plug-in electric vehicles. J Power Sources 259:117–124
Li TY, Yu DL, Zhang HS (2017) Using the GREET model to assess the life cycle of electric and conventional buses. Res Environ Sci 30(10):1653–1660
Bamber N, Turner I, Arulnathan V, Li Y, Zargar ES, Smart A, Pelletier N (2020) Comparing sources and analysis of uncertainty in consequential and attributional life cycle assessment: review of current practice and recommendations. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25(1):168–180
Ghosh T, Bakshi BR (2020) Designing hybrid life cycle assessment models based on uncertainty and complexity. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25(11):2290–2308
Kalverkamp M, Helmers E, Pehlken A (2020) Impacts of life cycle inventory databases on life cycle assessments: a review by means of a drivetrain case study. J Clean Prod 269:121329
Igos E, Benetto E, Meyer R, Baustert P, Othoniel B (2019) How to treat uncertainties in life cycle assessment studies? Int J Life Cycle Assess 24(4):794–807
Lo PS, Benini L (2022) A critical perspective on uncertainty appraisal and sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 26:763–781
Yu DL, Zhang HS (2019) The life cycle analysis of energy consumption and emission of pure electric van and diesel van. Acta Sci Circum 39(6):2043–2052
Li Y, Liu YH, Chen Y, Huang SY, Ju YY (2022) Projection of end-of-life vehicle population and recyclable metal resources: provincial-level gaps in China. Sustain Prod Consum 31:818–827