Legal remedies for girls' under‐representation in nontraditional career and technical education

International Journal of Manpower - Tập 27 Số 4 - Trang 396-416 - 2006
EllenEardley1, JessicaManvell2
1Woodley & McGillivary, Washington, DC, USA
2University of California, San Francisco, California USA

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this article is to document the extent of girls' under‐representation in nontraditional high school career and technical education courses, examine the role of sex discrimination in these disparities, and identify legal remedies for addressing the problem.Design/methodology/approachThis article uses high school CTE enrollment data from 12 states to document female students' under‐representation in nontraditional courses and uses wage data to show the negative implications for girls' future earnings. Drawing on the experiences of female students, this study explains how sex discrimination contributes to their low rates of participation in nontraditional training. The study then discusses how laws and regulations at the federal and state levels may provide means to address such discrimination.FindingsFinds high levels of sex segregation in CTE course enrollment, with female students making up on average 15 percent of students in nontraditional courses and 87 percent in traditionally female fields. Substantial evidence of sex discrimination in CTE makes a strong case for its role in contributing to girls' low enrollment in nontraditional courses. Varied state laws can be utilized to address this underlying cause.Originality/valueWhile much research has looked at girls in math and science, less attention has been paid to their participation in nontraditional CTE. This paper offers quantitative evidence of girls' under‐representation in such courses and qualitative evidence of the role sex discrimination plays. Offers a unique solution by showing how state laws can be used to address such discrimination and increase girls' participation in nontraditional training.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bureau of Labor Statistics (2005), “May 2004 national occupational employment and wage estimates”, available at: www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm.

Castellano, M. (1997), “It's not your skills, it's the test: gatekeepers for women in the skilled trades”, in Hull, G. (Ed.), Changing Work, Changing Workers: Critical Perspectives on Language, Literacy, and Skills, SUNY Press, Albany, NY, pp. 189‐213.

Giurleo, S. (1997), “Persisters and career changers in technical careers: are there gender differences?”, in Farmer, H.S. (Ed.), Diversity and Women's Career Development: From Adolescence to Adulthood, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 81‐94.

Johnson, L.A. (2002), “Education first: that's what the authors of Title IX had in mind”, Pittsburgh Post‐Gazette, October 6, p. E11.

Kemple, J. (2004), Career Academies: Impacts on Labor Market Outcomes and Educational Attainment, MDRC, New York, NY.

Klein, S. (n.d.), “How to do an NTO crosswalk”, prepared by MPR Associates for the US Department of Education's Office of Vocational and Adult Education, available at: www.napequity.org/pdf/How%20to%20do%20a%20NTO%20Crosswalk.pdf.

Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Growth (2004), Breaking Traditions 2004 Awards Presentation, Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Growth, Lansing, MI.

National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity (NAPE) (2001), “Perkins III implementation survey‐2000”, available at: www.napequity.org/pdf/Survey%20Summary%202000.pdf.

National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity (NAPE) (2003), “Perkins III implementation survey‐2002”, available at: www.napequity.org/pdf/SurveySummary2002.pdf.

National Coalition of Women and Girls in Education (NCWGE) (2001), “Invisible again: the impact of changes in federal funding on vocational programs for women and girls”, available at: www.ncwge.org/perkins.pdf.

National Women's Law Center (2002), “Title IX and equal opportunity in vocational and technical education: a promise still owed to the nation's youth”, available at: www.nwlc.org/pdf/career%20ed%20report%20for%20june%206%20press%20event3.pdf.

National Women's Law Center (2004), “Interview with anonymous female Illinois community college student”.

National Women's Law Center (2005a), “Tools of the trade: using the law to address sex segregation in high school career and technical education”, available at: www.nwlc.org/details.cfm?id=2462&section=education.

National Women's Law Center (2005b), “Forging new pathways”, available at: www.nwlc.org.pdf/Report2005_PPTW_Final.pdf.

Planning, Research and Evaluation Services Associates (n.d), “Non‐traditional programs crosswalk”, available at: www.presassociates.com/documents/Non‐Traditional%20Programs%20Crosswalk.pdf.

Reddin, J. (1997), “High‐achieving women: career development patterns”, in Farmer, H.S. (Ed.), Diversity and Women's Career Development: From Adolescence to Adulthood, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 95‐126.

Sanogo, M.C. (1995), “Facilitators and barriers to high school female participation in school‐to‐work: traditional vs nontraditional programs for females”, unpublished manuscript, thesis for Pennsylvania State University Graduate Program in Vocational Industrial Education, on file with author.

Shah, N. and Marra, A. (2002), “Despite moves to end biases, pupils stick to gender roles”, Palm Beach Post, September 2, p. 1A.

Silverman, S. and Pritchard, A. (1996), “Building their future: girls and technology education in Connecticut”, Journal of Technology Education, Vol. 7 No. 2, available at: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v7n2/silverman.jte‐v7n2.html.

Stearns, M. (2003), “From the frying pan to the fire; ex‐Kansas Citian faces more disputes in education post”, Kansas City Star, August 10.

Tims, N. (2005), Gender equity consultant, Michigan Office of Career and Technical Preparation, Interview with National Women's Law Center.

US Department of Education (2000a), “NCES classification of instructional programs”, available at: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/cip2000/.

US Department of Education (2000b), “CIP lookup to occupational crosswalks”, available at: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/cip2000/occupationallookup.asp.

US Department of Education (2004), “Final report to Congress: executive summary”, available at: www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/sectech/nave/naveexesum.pdf.

American Association of University Women Educational Foundation (2000), Tech‐Savvy: Educating Girls in the New Computer Age, Commission on Technology, Gender, and Teacher Education, American Association of University Women, Washington, DC.

American Association of University Women Educational Foundation (2001), Hostile Hallways: Bullying, Teasing, and Sexual Harassment in School, American Association of University Women, Washington, DC.

Bureau of Labor Statistics (2003a), “Nontraditional occupations for women in 2003”, available at: www.dol.gov/wb/factsheets/nontra2003.htm.

Bureau of Labor Statistics (2003b), “Table 11: employed persons by detailed occupation and sex, 2002 annual averages”, Current Population Survey, Annual Averages: Household Data, available at: www.bls.gov/cps/wlf‐tables11.pdf.

Gatta, M. and Trigg, M. (2001), “Bridging the gap: gender equity in science, engineering and technology”, Report for the New Jersey Employment and Training Commission's Council on Gender Parity in Labor and Education, Trenton, NJ.

Schofield, J. (1995), Computers and Classroom Culture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Student, B. (2005), “Application for the 2005 Michigan breaking tradition award”, sponsored by Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Growth, Office of Career and Technical Preparation, Lansing, MI.

US Department of Education (1997), “Sexual harassment guidance: harassment of students by school employees, other students or third parties”, available at: www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/sexhar00.html.

US Department of Education (2001), “Revised sexual harassment guidance: harassment of students by school employees, other students or third parties”, available at: www.ed.gov/offices/OCR/archives/shguide/index.html.